Temporal fluctuations in soil water repellency following wildfire in chaparral steeplands, southern California
K. R. Hubbert A C and V. Oriol BA Hubbert and Associates, 21610 Ramona Ave, Apple Valley, CA 92307, USA.
B USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside, CA 92507, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: huboutwest@earthlink.net
International Journal of Wildland Fire 14(4) 439-447 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF05036
Submitted: 31 March 2005 Accepted: 4 July 2005 Published: 25 November 2005
Abstract
Soil water repellency is particularly common in unburned chaparral, and its degree and duration can be influenced by seasonal weather conditions. Water repellency tends to increase in dry soils, while it decreases or vanishes following precipitation or extended periods of soil moisture. The 15 426 ha Williams Fire provided an opportunity to investigate post-fire fluctuations in water repellency over a 1-year period. Soil water repellency was measured at the surface, and at 2-cm and 4-cm depths along six east–west-positioned transects located within the chaparral-dominated San Dimas Experimental Forest. During the winter and spring, seasonal variation in the degree of surface water repellency appeared to be inversely proportional to antecedent rainfall and soil moisture conditions. Precipitation through December reduced the proportion of surface ‘moderate or higher repellency’ from 49 to 4% as soil wetness increased to 12%. Throughout the summer, soil wetness remained below 2%; however, surface soils remained ‘wettable’, with the proportion of surface ‘moderate or higher repellency’ never returning to the early post-fire amount of 47%. Interestingly, at the 4-cm depth, the proportion of ‘moderate or higher repellency’ remained at levels >25% throughout the summer dry season.
Bond R (1964) The influence of the microflora on the physical properties of soils. II. Field studies on water repellent sands. Australian Journal of Soil Research 2, 123–131.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crockford S, Topadilis S , Richardson DP (1991) Water repellency in a dry sclerophyll forest: Measurements and processes. Hydrological Processes 5, 405–420.
DeBano LF, Mann LD , Hamilton DA (1970) Translocation of hydrophobic substances into soils by burning organic litter. Soil Science Society of America Journal 31, 130–133.
Fogel R , Hunt G (1979) Fungal and arboreal biomass in a western Oregon Douglas fir ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 9, 245–256.
Hallett PD , Young IM (1999) Changes to water repellence of soil aggregates caused by substrate-induced microbial activity. European Journal of Soil Science 50, 35–40.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hubbert KR, Preisler HK, Wohlgemuth PM, Graham RC , Narog MG (in press) Prescribed burning effects on soil physical properties and soil water repellency in a steep chaparral watershed, southern California, USA. Geoderma ,
Krammes JS , DeBano LF (1965) Soil wettability: a neglected factor in watershed management. Water Resources Research 1, 283–286.
Neinhuis C , Barthlott W (1997) Characterization and distribution of water repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Annals of Botany 79, 667–677.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richardson JL , Hole FD (1978) Influence of vegetation on water-repellency in selected western Wisconsin soils. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 42, 465–467.
Savage SM (1974) Mechanism of fire-induced water repellency in soil. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 38, 652–657.
Teramura HA (1980) Relationships between stand age and water-repellency of chaparral soils. Bulletin of Torrey Botanical Club 104, 42–46.
Valat B, Jouany C , Riviere LM (1991) Characterization of the wetting properties of air-dried peats and composts. Soil Science 152, 100–107.