Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of fire shelters on perceived fire danger: implications for risk compensation

Curt C. Braun A D , Jason Fouts A , N. Clayton Silver B and Ted Putnam C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Psychology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-3043, USA.

B Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA.

C USDA Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center, 5785 Hwy 10 W, Missoula, MT 59808, USA

D Corresponding author. Telephone: +1 208 885 2540; fax: +1 208 885 7710; email: cbraun@uidaho.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 14(3) 297-306 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF04071
Submitted: 7 December 2004  Accepted: 19 July 2005   Published: 12 September 2005

Abstract

The fire shelter is an integral part of wildland firefighting Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). There is growing concern, however, that firefighters may accept greater levels of risk while carrying them. Such concerns are consistent with Risk Homeostasis Theory, which postulates that behavior is regulated by an internal stabilizing process that balances target and perceived risk and the effects of safety interventions. When any one of the three components changes, the resulting disequilibrium is compensated for by changes in behavior. As a safety intervention, fire shelters may alter the equilibrium of this system producing a behavior change that negates any safety improvements it produced. Two experiments were conducted to assess how PPE affects the behavior of athletes and how fire shelters affect wildland firefighters’ perceptions of fire danger. In Experiment 1, 53% of participants demonstrated behavior that offset gains in safety produced by PPE. The results from Experiment 2 revealed that the presence of fire shelters significantly reduced perceived hazard levels associated with three different fire scenarios. Although neither experiment actually measured the behavior of firefighters, the combined results suggest that firefighters might not be immune to the effects of risk compensation.

Additional keywords: Risk Homeostasis Theory, risk perception.


References


Adams JGU (1985) Smeed’s law, seat belts, and the Emperor’s new clothes. In ‘Human behavior and traffic safety’. (Eds L Evans, RC Schwing) pp. 193–257. (Plenum Press: New York)

Adams JGU (1988) Risk homeostasis and the purpose of safety regulation. Ergonomics  31, 407–428.
OECD (1990) ‘Behavioural adaptations to changes in the road transport system.’ (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Road Transport Research Publications: Paris)

O’Neill B (1977) A decision-theory model of danger compensation. Accident Analysis and Prevention  9, 157–165.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wilde GJS (1994) ‘Target risk.’ (PDE Publications: Toronto)

Wong YD , Nicholson A (1992) Driver behaviour at horizontal curves: risk compensation and the margin of safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention  24, 425–436.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Zuckerman M (1979) ‘Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal.’ (Erlbaum: New York)