Forest fire causes and extent on United States Forest Service lands
Scott L. Stephens
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Division of Ecosystem Science, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA. Telephone: +1 510 642 7304; email: stephens@nature.berkeley.edu
International Journal of Wildland Fire 14(3) 213-222 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF04006
Submitted: 2 February 2004 Accepted: 3 March 2005 Published: 12 September 2005
Abstract
Nationally, the causes and extent of fire on lands administrated by the United States Forest Service varied significantly from 1940 to 2000, with California experiencing the largest relative annual burned areas. The south-east and California experienced the largest relative area burned by fires from human ignitions. No significant differences were detected in the relative area burned by lightning in California, the upper and central Rocky Mountains, and the south-west, which all experienced the highest levels. The north-west and Rocky Mountains have experienced significant increases in the relative total area burned; the north-east, south-east, California, and coastal Alaska all remained unchanged. The northern Rocky Mountains, south-west, and north-east have all experienced significant increases in the amount of area burned by lightning without significant increases in lightning ignitions. Increasing fuel hazards in these areas probably contributed to the increasing area burned by lightning fires; changing climate could have also contributed to the increase in wildfire area from 1940 to 2000. To be effective across the diverse forest types and conditions in the USA, fire policy should better recognize and respond to the diversity of US forests and how they have burned in the past. This analysis determined that there is high geographical diversity on wildfire occurrence and causes. Local input is therefore important in designing diverse, ground-based solutions to address fire management challenges in the United States.
Additional keywords: fire policy; fire statistics; fire suppression; forest policy; wildfire.
References
Agee JK, Bahro B, Finney MA, Omi PN, Sapsis DB, Skinner CN, Wagtendonk JW , Weatherspoon CP
(2000) The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. Forest Ecology and Management 127, 55–66.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Akaike H (1971) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In ‘2nd international symposium on information theory. Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Research Memorandum No. 46’. (Eds BN Petrov, F Csaki) pp. 267–281. (Akademiai Kiade: Budapest)
Akaike H
(1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 79, 716–723.
| Crossref |
Biswell HH (1989) ‘Prescribed burning in California wildland vegetation management.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley) 255 pp.
Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1976) ‘Time series analysis: Forecasting and control.’ (Holden-Day: San Francisco)
Brown RT, Agee JK , Franklin JF
(2004) Forest restoration and fire: principles in the context of place. Conservation Biology 18, 903–912.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman HH (1926) ‘Factors determining natural regeneration of longleaf pine on cut-over lands in the LaSalle Parish, Louisiana.’ Bulletin number 16. (Yale School of Forestry: New Haven, CT)
Christensen NL, Agee JK, Brussard PF, Hughes J , Knight DH
(1998) Interpreting the Yellowstone fires of 1988. Bioscience 39, 678–685.
GAO (2003) ‘Forest service fuels reduction.’ Report GAO-03–689R. (US General Accounting Office: Washington, DC) 43 pp.
Godwin DP
(1946) Helicopters hopes for fire control. Fire Control Notes 7, 16–21.
Graves HS (1910) ‘Protection of forests from fire.’ US Forest Service Bulletin 82. (Washington, DC) 48 pp.
Greeley WB (1951) ‘Forests and men.’ (Doubleday Publishing: Garden City, NY)
Hoff JC (1983) ‘A practical guide to Box-Jenkins forecasting.’ (Lifetime Learning Publications: London)
Jefferson FJ
(1947) The helicopter—a new factor in fire control. Fire Control Notes 9, 1–9.
Komarek EV (1962) The use of fire: an historical background. In ‘Proceedings of the 1st Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference’. pp. 7–10. (Tall Timbers Research Station: Tallahassee, FL)
Martin RE, Kauffman JB, Landsberg JD (1989) Use of prescribed fire to reduce wildfire potential. In ‘Proceedings of the symposium on fire and watershed management’. (Technical Coordinator NH Berg) USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report PSW-109. (Berkeley, CA)
McKenzie D, Gedalof Z, Peterson DL , Mote P
(2004) Climate change, wildfire, and conservation. Conservation Biology 18, 890–902.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NWCG (2001) ‘Review and update of the 1995 federal wildland fire management policy.’ (National Wildfire Coordinating Group, Interagency Fire Center: Boise, ID)
Pankratz A (1983) ‘Forecasting with univariate Box-Jenkins models: Concepts and cases.’ (Wiley: New York)
Pinchot G (1907) ‘The use of the National Forests.’ (USDA Forest Service) 42 pp.
Pollet J , Omi PN
(2002) Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on wildfire severity in Ponderosa forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 11, 1–10.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pyne SJ (1982) ‘Fire in America: a cultural history of wildland and rural fire.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ) 654 pp.
Pyne SJ (1997) ‘America’s fires: management on wildlands and forests.’ (Forest History Society: Durham, NC) 54 pp.
Romme WH , Knight DL
(1981) Fire frequency and subalpine forest succession along a topographic gradient in Wyoming. Ecology 62, 319–326.
Schiff AL (1962) ‘Fire and water; scientific heresy in the Forest Service.’ (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA) 225 pp.
Schuster EG, Cleaves DA, Bell EF (1997) ‘Analysis of USDA Forest Service fire-related expenditures 1970–1995.’ USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Report PSW-230-WWW. (Berkeley, CA)
Shea JP
(1940) Our pappies burned the woods and set a pattern of human behavior in the southern forests that calls for new methods of fire prevention. American Forests 46, 159–162.
USDA (1940–2000) ‘Forest fire report (annual).’ (USDA Forest Service Department of Fire and Aviation Management: Washington, DC)
USDA
(1946) Unit protection by air control. Fire Control Notes 7, 3–5.
USDA (1960) ‘Air attack on forest fires.’ Agricultural Information Bulletin 229. (USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC) 32 pp.
USDA (1995a) ‘Smokey Bear, the first fifty years.’ USDA Forest Service Publication FS-551.
USDA (1995b) ‘Course to the future: positioning fire and aviation management.’ (USDA Forest Service Department of Fire and Aviation Management: Washington, DC) 19 pp.
USDA (2002) ‘Southern forest resource assessment.’ USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report SRS-53. (Asheville, NC)
USDA–USDI (2000) ‘A report to the President in response to the wildfires of 2000. The National Fire Plan.’ Available at http://www.fireplan.gov/ [Verified 12 May 2005]
van Wagtendonk JW (1996) Use of a deterministic fire growth model to test fuel treatments. In ‘Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, Vol. II, Assessments and scientific basis for management options’. pp. 1155–1166. (University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources: Davis)
Veblen TT, Hadley KS, Nell EM, Kitzberger T, Reid M , Villalba R
(1994) Disturbance regime and disturbance interactions in a Rocky Mountain subalpine forest. Journal of Ecology 82, 125–136.
Weatherspoon CP, Skinner CN (1996) Fire silviculture relationships in Sierra Forests. In ‘Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, Vol. II, Assessments and scientific basis for management options’. pp. 1167–1176. (University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources: Davis)
Weaver H
(1943) Fire as an ecological and silvicultural factor in the ponderosa pine region of the Pacific slope. Journal of Forestry 41, 7–15.
Zar JH (1999) ‘Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn.’ (Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ) 663 pp.
