Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Predicting lime-induced changes in soil-pH From exchangeable aluminum, soil-Ph, total exchangeable cations and organic-carbon values measured on unlimed soils

Z Hochman, GJ Crocker and EB Dettman

Australian Journal of Soil Research 33(1) 31 - 41
Published: 1995

Abstract

The 'Lime-it' model is a decision support system for graziers wanting to lime acid soils. In this study we used field experimental data to test, improve and validate the model's ability to predict changes in soil pH due to variable rates of lime. Data from 13 field experiments, in which soil parameters were measured 1 year after liming acid soils, were used to derive an index of pH responsiveness to lime (LRI) at each site. Multivariate analysis was used to derive a predictive model: LRI was found to be significantly correlated (P < 0.0001) with hydrogen ion concentration ([H+]x 105 ), exchangeable aluminium (Al), exchangeable cations (TEC) and percent organic carbon (C) data of the unlimed soils. The multivariate equation was then tested against an independent data set by comparing the predicted pH change with the measured pH change for eight soils. This evaluation, though generally acceptable, showed a small but significant deviation from the desired 1:1 ratio between observed and predicted pH change. We re-calibrated the model for the combined data to derive the model: LRI = 0.764 + 0.042 [H+] - 0.016 TEC - 0.097 Al - 0.016 C. When this model was tested over the whole data set for predicted v. measured pH changes, the following result was found: measured pH change = 1.01 (predicted pH change) - 0.05 (R2 = 0.85, n = 308). The implications of the predictive equation are considered with regard to the mechanisms that are thought to be associated with pH buffering.

Keywords: Soil Ph; Lime Response Index; Aluminum; Organic Carbon; Ph Buffering; Effective Cation Exchange Capacity;

https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9950031

© CSIRO 1995

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions