Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Predicting soil organic carbon percentage from loss-on-ignition using Bayesian Model Averaging

Ai Leon A C and Roberto Leon Gonzalez B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, 3-1-3 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8604, Japan.

B National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), 7-22-1 Roppongi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 106-8677, Japan.

C Corresponding author. Email: leon@affrc.go.jp

Australian Journal of Soil Research 47(8) 763-769 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR08119
Submitted: 10 May 2008  Accepted: 28 August 2009   Published: 11 December 2009

Abstract

A shortage of data for percentage of organic carbon (C%) makes calculation of soil profile carbon storage difficult. Loss on ignition (LOI) data, which are cheap to obtain and often readily available, can be used to estimate organic C%. This paper simultaneously considers several predictors of organic C%: LOI, parent material, drainage status, type of soil horizon, clay content, and pH. In order to model appropriately the existence of multiple hypotheses and the consequent model uncertainty, a Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) approach was used. BMA considers all models that result from all possible combinations of explanatory variables. Based on a BMA approach and Scottish Soil Survey data, it was found that the most important factors to predict organic C% were LOI, clay content, a dummy for Countesswells Association (till derived from granite), and a dummy for B horizon soils. The validation analysis showed that prediction accuracy for organic C% was better with the BMA approach than with an ordinary least-squares approach that includes no other predictors apart from LOI (i.e. 22% reduction in horizons A, Ap, and C).

Additional keywords: soil organic C%–loss-on-ignition relationship, soil parent material, drainage status, type of soil horizon, clay content, pH.


Acknowledgement

The authors are indebted to Professor Malcolm Cresser for his constructive advice as PhD advisor, and to Dr Jimmy Gauld at The Macaulay Institute for provision of data and helpful advice.


References


Ball DF (1964) Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic matter and organic carbon in non-calcareous soils. Journal of Soil Science 15, 84–92.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Batjes NH (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science 47, 151–163.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Broadbent FE (1953) The soil organic fraction. Advances in Agronomy 5, 153–183.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Craft CB, Seneca ED, Broome SW (1991) Loss on ignition and Kjeldahl digestion for estimating organic carbon and total nitrogen in estuarine marsh soils: calibration with dry combustion. Estuaries 14(2), 175–179.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Cresser MS, Gonzalez RL, Leon A (2007) Evaluation of the use of soil depth and parent material data when predicting soil organic carbon concentration from LOI values. Geoderma 140, 132–139.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

David MB (1988) Use of loss-on-ignition to assess soil organic carbon in forest soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 19, 1593–1599.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

De Vos B, Lettens S, Muys B, Deckers JA (2007) Walkley–Black analysis of forest soil organic carbon: recovery, limitations and uncertainty. Soil Use and Management 23, 221–229.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Donkin MJ (1991) Loss-on-ignition as an estimator of soil organic carbon in A-horizon forestry soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 22, 233–241.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Eswaran H, Van Den Berg E, Reich P (1993) Organic carbon in soils of the world. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57, 192–194. open url image1

Fernández C, Ley E, Steel M (2001) Benchmark Priors for Bayesian Model Averaging. Journal of Econometrics 100, 381–427.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Glentworth R , Muir JW (1963) ‘The soils around Aberdeen Inverurie and Fraserburgh.’ (The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, H.M.S.O.: Edinburgh)

Goldin A (1987) Reassessing the use of loss-on-ignition for estimating organic matter content in noncalcareous soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 18, 1111–1116.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gujarati D (1999) ‘Essentials of econometrics.’ 2nd edn (Irwin McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA)

Hesse PR (1971) ‘A textbook of soil chemical analysis.’ (John Murray: London)

Hoeting JA, Madigan D, Raftery AE, Volinsky CT (1999) Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial (with discussion). Statistical Science 14, 382–417.
Crossref |
open url image1

Howard PJA (1965) The carbon-organic matter factor in various soil types. Oikos 15, 229–236.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Howard PJA, Howard DM (1990) Use of organic carbon and loss-on-ignition to estimate soil organic matter in different soil types and horizons. Biology and Fertility of Soils 9, 306–310.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Huntington TG, Ryan DF, Hamburg SP (1988) Estimating soil nitrogen and carbon pools in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52, 1162–1167.
CAS |
open url image1

Jackson ML (1958) ‘Soil chemical analysis.’ (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

Jain TB, Graham RT, Adams DL (1997) Carbon to organic matter ratios for soils in Rocky Mountain Coniferous Forests. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61, 1190–1195.
CAS |
open url image1

Karla YP , Maynard DG (1991) Methods manual for forest soil and plant analysis. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edomonton, Alberta, Information Report NOR-X-319.

Konen ME, Jacobs PM, Burras CL, Talaga BJ, Mason JA (2002) Equations for predicting soil organic carbon using loss-on-ignition for north central U.S. soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 1878–1881.
CAS |
open url image1

Kurth VJ, MacKenzie MD, DeLuca TH (2006) Estimating charcoal content in forest mineral soils. Geoderma 137, 135–139.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Macaulay Institute for Soil Research (1984) ‘Organization and methods of the 1 : 250 000 Soil Survey of Scotland.’ (The Macaulay Institute: Aberdeen)

Raftery AE (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion). Sociological Methodology 25, 111–195.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Raftery AE, Zheng Y (2003) Discussion: Performance of Bayesian Model Averaging. Journal of the American Statistical Association 98, 931–938.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ragg JM (1973) Factors in soil formation. In ‘The organic resources of Scotland.’ (Ed. J Tivy) pp. 38–50. (Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh)

Richard SJ, Peterson DL, Hammer D (2000) Carbon distribution in subalpine forests and meadows of the olympic mountains. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 1834–1845. open url image1

Robinson GW (1949) ‘Soils, their origin, constitution, and classification.’ (Wiley: New York)

Skjemstad JO, Taylor JA (1999) Does the Walkley–Black method determine soil charcoal? Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 30, 2299–2310.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Sombroek WG, Nachtergaele FO, Hebel A (1993) Amounts, dynamics and sequestering of carbon in tropical and subtropical soils. Ambio 22, 417–426. open url image1