Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > SR > SR07118
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 46(3)

Assessment of spatial variability of penetration resistance and hardpan characteristics in a cassava field

Osama Mohawesh A D , Tomoyasu Ishida B , Kazunari Fukumura B and Kunihiko Yoshino C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Plant Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mu’tah University, Al-Karak 61710, Jordan.

B Faculty of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University, Mine-machi 350, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 321-8505, Japan.

C College of Policy and Planning Science, Tsukuba University, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan.

D Corresponding author. Email: osama.mohawesh@gmail.com

Australian Journal of Soil Research 46(3) 210-218 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07118
Submitted: 15 August 2007  Accepted: 20 February 2008   Published: 1 May 2008

Abstract

Soil compaction is generally defined as an increase of the natural density of soil at a particular depth. This compacted soil layer spatially varies over the field. Describing within-field variability is a fundamental first step towards determining the size of management zones. The purpose of the study was to explain the spatial variability of penetration resistance (PR) and hardpan characteristics. Soil PR, dry bulk density (BD), and water content (WC) were measured on the nodes of a mesh. Statistical and geostatistical analysis were used to analyse the spatial variability of PR at 5 depths: 0.0–0.1, 0.1–0.2, 0.2–0.3, 0.3–0.4, and 0.4–0.5 m, and hardpan characteristics. PR had the maximum variability among the measured properties. Hardpan lower edge depth varied from 0.297 to 0.714 m, having a mean and CV of 0.411 m and 20.43, respectively. PR was inversely related to WC. Correlation between BD and WC and PR for the same layer was relatively high. PR and hardpan characteristics showed spatial variability across the field, except PR at depth 0.1–0.2 m. Spherical isotropic models fitted all the measured properties. The range of values of the spatial structure was greater than 7.6 m. The results showed that hardpan and PR spatially varied across the field. These results are important in determining the necessary tillage technique as well as the tillage depth and the target compacted area for a suitable land management. These results also have important implications for how site-specific management information should be collected and explained.

Additional keywords: penetration resistance, spatial variability, hardpan, compaction.


Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor M. Kutilek from Nad Patankou, Czek Republic for his comments. Thanks to Dr S. Talozi from Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan for his help in the final editing of this paper.


References


Abu-Hamdeh NH (2003) Soil compaction and root distribution for okra as affected by tillage and vehicle parameters. Soil and Tillage Research 74, 25–35.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Batey T, Mckenzie DC (2006) Soil compaction: identification directly in the field. Soil Use and Management 22, 123–131.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Blake GR , Hartage KH (1986) Bulk density. In ‘Methods of soil analysis. Part I. The physical and mineralogical methods’. ASA Monogragh. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 363–376. (SSSA, ASA: Madison, WI)

Box JE Jr., Langdale GW (1984) The effects of in-row subsoil tillage and soil water on corn yields in the Southeastern Coastal Plain of the United States. Soil and Tillage Research 4, 67–78.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Buchter B, Aina PO, Azari AS, Nielsen DR (1991) Soil spatial variability along transects. Soil Technology 4, 297–314.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cambardella GA, Moorman TB, Nowak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 1501–1511. open url image1

Cooper AW , Trouse AC , Dumas WT (1969) Controlled traffic in row crop production. In ‘Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of C.I.G.R’. W. Germany, Section iii, Theme 1, pp. 1–6.

Deutsch C , Journel A (1997) ‘Geostatistical software library and user’s guide.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Fulton JP , Wells LG , Shearer SA , Barnhisel RI (1996) Spatial variation of soil physical properties: a precursor to precision tillage. ASAE paper No. 961002, International Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona, 14–18 July.

Golden Software Inc. (1994) ‘Surfer v6.0. Surface mapping system. Golden Co. for Windows: Users guide.’ (Golden Co., USA, Golden Software Inc.)

Goodson R , Letlow R , Rester D , Stevens J (2000) Use of precision agriculture technology to evaluate soil compaction. In ‘Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable agriculture’. Monroe, LA, 19–21 June. pp. 23–30.

Goovaerts P (1997) ‘Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Hakansson I , Voorhees WB (1998) Soil compaction. In ‘Methods for assessment of soil degradation’. (Ed. R Lal) pp. 167–179. (CRS Press: Boca Raton, FL)

Hoogmoed WB, Derpsch R (1985) Chisel ploughing as alternative tillage systems in Parana, Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research 6, 53–67.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Issaks EH , Srivastava RM (1989) ‘An introduction to applied geostatistics.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Journel AG , Huijbregts CJ (1978) ‘Mining geostatistics.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Kashirad A, Fiskell JGA, Carlisle VW, Hutton CE (1967) Tillage pan characterization of selected Coastal Plain soils. Soil Science Society America of Proceedings 31, 534–541. open url image1

Kiliç K, Ozago E, Akbas F (2004) Assessment of spatial variability in penetration resistance as 　related to some soil physical properties of two fluvents in Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research 76, 1–11.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mohawesh O, Fukumura K, Ishida T, Yoshino K (2005a) Soil hydraulic properties in a Cassava field as a function of soil dry bulk density. Journal of Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources 18, 156–166.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mohawesh O, Fukumura K, Ishida T, Yoshino K (2005b) Assessment of spatial variability of soil and canopy properties in a Cassava field. Journal of Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources 18, 501–509.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nielsen DR, Biggar JW, Erh KT (1973) Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties. Hilgradia 42, 215–259. open url image1

Pannatier Y (1996) ‘Variowin: software for spatial data analysis in 2-D.’ (Springer: New York, Berlin)

Raper RL, Reeves DW, Burmester CH, Schwab EB (2000) Tillage depth, tillage timing, and cover crop effects on cotton yield, soil strength, and tillage energy requirements. Applied Engineering Agriculture 16, 379–385. open url image1

Raper RL, Schwab EB, Dabney SM (2005) Measurements and variation of site-specific hardpans for silty upland soils in the Southeastern United States. Soil and Tillage Research 84, 7–17.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Raper RL, Simionescu PA, Kornecki TS, Price AJ, Reeves DW (2004) Reducing vibration while maintaining efficacy of rollers to terminate cover crops. Applied Engineering Agriculture 20, 581–584. open url image1

Reeves DW, Rogers HH, Droppers JA, Prior SA, Powell JB (1992) Wheel-traffic effects on corn as influenced by tillage system. Soil and Tillage Research 23, 177–192.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

SPSS Inc (1999) ‘SPSS. Version 10.0.’ (SPSS: Chicago, IL)

Taylor HM (1973) Effect of soil strength on seeding emergence, root growth and crop yield. In ‘Compaction of Agricultural Soils’. American Society of Agriculture Engineering Monograph. pp. 292–305. (American Society of Agriculture Engineering: St. Joseph, MI)

Trangmar BB, Yost RS, Uehara G (1985) Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Advances in Agronomy 38, 45–94. open url image1

Utset A, Cid G (2001) Soil penetrometer resistance spatial variability in a Ferralsol at several soil moisture conditions. Soil and Tillage Research 61, 193–202.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vaz CMP, Hopmans JW (2001) Simultaneous measurements of soil strength and water content with a combined penetrometer-moisture probe. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65, 4–12. open url image1

Veronese Junior V, Carvalho MP, Dafonte J, Freddi OS, Vidal Vazquez E, Ingaramo OE (2006) Spatial variability of soil water content and mechanical resistance of Brazilian ferralsol. Soil and Tillage Research 85, 166–177.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vieira SR, Nielsen DR, Biggar JW (1981) Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rate. Soil Science Society of America Journal 45, 1040–1048. open url image1

Warrick AW , Myers DE , Nielsen DR (1986) Geostatistical methods applied to soil science. In ‘Methods of soil analysis’. Part 1. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 53–57. (SSSA, ASA: Madison, WI)

Warrick AW , Nielsen DR (1980) Spatial variability of soil physical properties in the field. In ‘Applications of soil physics’. (Ed. D Hillel) pp. 319–344. (Academic Press: New York)