Deriving point and parametric pedotransfer functions of some gypsiferous soils
Mehdi Homaee A B and Ahmad Farrokhian Firouzi AA Department of Soil Science, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran 14155-4838, Iran.
B Corresponding author. Email: mhomaee@modares.ac.ir
Australian Journal of Soil Research 46(3) 219-227 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07161
Submitted: 15 October 2007 Accepted: 10 March 2008 Published: 1 May 2008
Abstract
Parametric description of the soil water retention curve as well as the hydraulic conductivity curve is needed for modelling water movement and solute transport in the vadose zone. The objective of this study was to derive pedotransfer functions (PTFs) to predict the water retention curve and the van Genuchten and the van Genuchten–Mualem parameters of some gypsiferous soils. Consequently, 185 gypsiferous soil samples were collected and their physical properties were measured. The particle size distribution was determined in 2 steps: (i) with gypsum, by covering the particles with barium sulphate; (ii) without gypsum, using the hydrometry method. The easily obtainable variables were grouped as (1) particle size distribution, bulk density, and gypsum content; and (2) bulk density, gypsum content, geometric mean, and geometric standard deviation of the particle diameter. Stepwise multiple linear regression method was used to derive the PTFs. Two types of parametric and point functions were derived using these variables. The first group of variables predicted water retention and the van Genuchten and van Genuchten–Mualem parameters better than the second group. The gypsum content appeared to be the second dominant parameter for predicting water retention at 0, −330, −1000, −3000, −5000, and −15 000 cm. The derived PTFs were compared with the Rosetta database as independent dataset. The validity test indicated that in order to predict the hydraulic properties of gypsiferous soils the derived PTFs are more accurate than what can be obtained from the Rosetta database. Removal of gypsum increased the water retention at pressure heads of 0, –100, –330, –1000, –3000, –5000, and –15 000 cm (P < 0.01). The results also indicated that hydraulic parameters were different for the same soil with and without gypsum.
Additional keywords: gypsiferous soils, pedotransfer functions, retention curve, vadose zone.
Ahuja LR,
Nasy JW, Williams RD
(1984) Scaling to characterise soil water properties and infiltration modeling. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 970–973.
Campbell GS
(1974) A simple method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from moisture retention data. Soil Science 177, 311–314.
Carsel RF, Parrish RS
(1988) Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristic. Water Resources Research 24, 755–769.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gupta SC, Larson WE
(1979) Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter content, and bulk density. Water Resources Research 15, 1633–1635.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hesse PR
(1976) Particle size distribution in gypsic soils. Plant and Soil 44, 241–247.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mualem Y
(1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research 12, 513–522.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Porta J
(1998) Methodologies for the analysis and characterization of gypsum in soils. A review. Geoderma 87, 31–46.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL
(1982) Estimating soil water retention from soil water properties. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers IR2 108, 166–171.
Rawls WJ,
Gish TJ, Brakensiek DL
(1991) Estimating water retention from soil physical properties and characteristics. Advance Soil Science 16, 213–234.
Schaap MG,
Leij FJ, van Genuchten MTh
(2001) Rosetta: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of Hydrology 251, 163–176.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shirazi MA, Boersma L
(1984) A unifying quantitative analysis of soil texture. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 142–147.
van Genuchten MTh
(1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 892–898.
Vereecken H,
Maes J, Feyen J
(1989b) Estimating unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from easily measured soil properties. Soil Science 149, 1–12.
Vereecken H,
Maes J,
Feyen J, Darius P
(1989a) Estimating the soil moisture retention characteristics from texture, bulk density and carbon content. Soil Science Society of America Journal 148, 389–403.
Williams RD,
Ahuja LR, Naney JW
(1992) Comparison of methods to estimate soil water characteristics from limited texture, bulk density and limited data. Soil Science Society of America Journal 153, 172–184.
Wösten JHM,
Finke PA, Janes MJW
(1995) Comparison of class and continuous pedotransfer functions to generate soil hydraulic characteristics. Geoderma 66, 227–237.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wösten JHM,
Pachepsky Ya A, Rawls WJ
(2001) Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 251, 123–150.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
