The relation between soil structure and solute transport under raised bed cropping and conventional cultivation in south-western Victoria
J. E. Holland A , R. E. White A and R. Edis A BA School of Resource Management, Faculty of Land and Food Resources, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: roberte@unimelb.edu.au
Australian Journal of Soil Research 45(8) 577-585 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07068
Submitted: 25 May 2007 Accepted: 19 October 2007 Published: 7 December 2007
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between soil structure and solute transport in a texture contrast soil under 2 different tillage treatments—raised beds and conventional cultivation—in south-western Victoria. Undisturbed soil samples were collected for resin-impregnation and image analysis. This enabled several descriptive parameters of macropore structure to be calculated. Large, undisturbed soil samples were also collected for a solute transport experiment using a KCl solution. A convective log-normal transfer function was used to model Cl– movement. The assessment of soil structure showed that the raised beds contained a better connected pore network than the conventionally cultivated soil. Solute transport was faster through the raised bed soil when close to saturation (at –5 mm tension). Under these conditions, the solute transport parameters showed a smaller ratio of transport volume to soil water volume in the raised bed than the conventionally cultivated soil. Together, these data strongly indicate that the raised beds had greater pore connectivity and were able to transmit solute faster and more efficiently than the conventionally cultivated soil. It is concluded that raised bed soils are better structured and provide less risk from waterlogging than conventionally cultivated soils. However, there is greater potential for preferential flow of pesticides and solutes in raised bed soils.
Additional keywords: south-western Victoria, texture-contrast, soil structure, convective lognormal transfer function, macropore, pore connectivity.
Acknowledgments
Financial support was provided by the Grains Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, under the Sustainable Farming Systems program (Project no. UM148). Additional support was received from the Postgraduate Publication Award of the Faculty of Land and Food Resources, The University of Melbourne. The authors would like to thank Dr Anthony Ringrose-Voase and Mr Inars Salins for access to and assistance in the thin section facility, Butler Laboratory, CSIRO Land and Water. Finally, the authors were grateful to Mr Rowan Peel, the farmer at Mt Pollock, for access to the experimental site and assistance in the field when sampling.
Andreini MS, Steenhuis TS
(1990) Preferential paths of flow under conventional and conservation tillage. Geoderma 46, 85–102.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beecher HG,
Dunn BW,
Thompson JA,
Humphreys E,
Mathews SK, Timsina J
(2006) Effect of raised beds, irrigation and nitrogen management on growth, water use and yield of rice in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1363–1372.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bejat L,
Perfect E,
Quisenberry VL,
Coyne MS, Haszler GR
(2000) Solute transport as related to soil structure in unsaturated intact soil blocks. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 818–826.
Bouma J
(1991) Influence of soil macroporosity on environmental quality. Advances in Agronomy 46, 1–37.
Cresswell HP,
Smiles DE, Williams J
(1992) Soil structure, soil hydraulic properties and the soil water balance. Australian Journal of Soil Research 30, 265–283.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ersahin S,
Papendick RI,
Smith JL,
Keller CK, Manoranjan VS
(2002) Macropore transport of bromide as influenced by soil structure differences. Geoderma 108, 207–223.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Francis GS,
Cameron KC, Kemp RA
(1988) A comparison of soil porosity and solute leaching after six years of direct drilling or conventional cultivation. Australian Journal of Soil Research 26, 637–649.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gardner WK,
Fawcett RG,
Steed GR,
Pratley JE,
Whitfield DM, van Rees H
(1992) Crop production on duplex soils in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 32, 915–927.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heng LK,
Tillman RW, White RE
(1999) Anion and cation leaching through large undisturbed soil cores under different flow regimes. 1. Experimental results. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37, 711–726.
Heng LK, White RE
(1996) A simple analytical transfer function approach to modelling the leaching of reactive solutes through field soil. Water Resources Research 47, 33–42.
Jury WA
(1982) Simulation of solute transport using a transfer function model. Water Resources Research 18, 363–368.
Lipiec J,
Kus J,
Slowinska-Jurkiewicz A, Nosalewicz A
(2006) Soil porosity and water infiltration as influenced by tillage methods. Soil and Tillage Research 89, 210–220.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Magesan GN,
Vogeler I,
Scotter DR,
Clothier BE, Tillman RW
(1995) Solute movement through two unsaturated soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 33, 585–596.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Merdun H, Quisenberry VL
(2004) Relating model parameters to basic soil properties. Australian Journal of Soil Research 42, 841–849.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Persson M, Berndtsson R
(1998) Estimating transport parameters in an undisturbed soil column using time domain reflectometry and transfer function theory. Journal of Hydrology 205, 232–247.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tisdall JM, Hodgson AS
(1990) Ridge tillage in Australia: a review. Soil and Tillage Research 18, 127–144.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vanderborght J,
Gonzalez C,
Vanclooster M,
Mallants D, Feyen J
(1997) Effects of soil type and water flux on solute transport. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61, 372–389.
Vanderborght J,
Timmerman A, Feyen J
(2000) Solute transport for steady-state and transient flow in soils with and without macropores. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 1305–1317.
Vervoort RW, Cattle SR
(2003) Linking hydraulic conductivity and tortuosity parameters to pore space geometry and pore-size distribution. Journal of Hydrology 272, 36–49.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vervoort RW,
Radcliffe DE, West LT
(1999) Soil structure development and preferential solute flow. Water Resources Research 35, 913–928.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vogel HJ,
Cousin I, Roth K
(2002) Quantification of pore structure and gas diffusion as a function of scale. European Journal of Soil Science 53, 465–473.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White RE,
Dyson JS,
Haigh RA,
Jury WA, Sposito G
(1986) A transfer function model of solute transport through soil 2. Illustrative applications. Water Resources Research 22, 248–254.