Service delivery of at-home STI testing using self-collected samples: a qualitative investigation of values and preferences among adults in Rakai, Uganda
Yasmin P. Ogale
A * , M. Kathryn Grabowski B , Proscovia Nabakka C , Herman Mukiibi C , Frank Lukabwe C , Neema Nakyanjo C , Fred Nalugoda C , Joseph Kagaayi C , Godfrey Kigozi C , Charlotte A. Gaydos B , Julie A. Denison A and Caitlin E. Kennedy A
A
B
C
Abstract
Studies have shown that clients accept the self-collection of samples for sexually transmitted infection testing (SCS/STI testing), and at-home service delivery is a promising approach to expand diagnosis. However, few studies have examined client values surrounding service delivery in low-resource settings. This formative research study explores clients’ service delivery values and preferences for at-home SCS/STI testing in rural Uganda.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 adults – 15 males and 21 females – who self-collected a sample for STI testing in Rakai, Uganda, as part of the Rakai Community Cohort Study. After self-collection, participants were asked for their preferences on various at-home service delivery components, including: (1) requesting/receiving testing materials, (2) sending samples to the laboratory, (3) receiving results, and (4) receiving treatment; as well as various service delivery models. We also conducted interviews with nine key informants to contextualize results. Using the framework method, we identified key preferences across all participants, and stratified by gender.
Participants most valued an at-home SCS/STI testing program that offered timely service, as well as health professionals’ expertise. Clients also valued privacy/confidentiality; certainty that processes were completed correctly; access to services/resources; and ownership/responsibility for their own health. Although these values were expressed by both genders, access, privacy/confidentiality and ownership/responsibility were more prominent among females.
Our findings suggest a potential role for at-home SCS/STI testing in this population, as long as key client values are addressed. Program implementers will need to consider how to balance convenience for clients with professional support.
Keywords: formative research, self-care, self-collection, self-sample, service delivery, sexually transmitted disease, sexually transmitted infection, STD, STI, values and preferences.
References
1 Harding-Esch EM, Hollis E, Mohammed H, Saunders JM. Self-sampling and self-testing for STIs and HIV: the case for consistent nomenclature. Sex Transm Infect 2017; 93: 445-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
2 Taylor D, Lunny C, Wong T, Gilbert M, Li N, Lester R, Krajden M, Hoang L, Ogilvie G. Self-collected versus clinician-collected sampling for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev 2013; 2: 93.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
3 Ogale YP, Yeh PT, Kennedy CE, Toskin I, Narasimhan M. Self-collection of samples as an additional approach to deliver testing services for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4: e001349.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
4 Kohl KS, Markowitz LE, Koumans EH. Developments in the screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2003; 30: 637-58.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
5 Jamil MS, Hocking JS, Bauer HM, Ali H, Wand H, Smith K, Walker J, Donovan B, Kaldor JM, Guy RJ. Home-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes. BMC Publ Health 2013; 13: 189.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
6 Long L, Abraham C, Paquette R, Shahmanesh M, Llewellyn C, Townsend A, Gilson R. Brief interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections suitable for in-service use: a systematic review. Prev Med 2016; 91: 364-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
7 Odesanmi TY, Wasti SP, Odesanmi OS, Adegbola O, Oguntuase OO, Mahmood S. Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of home-based and clinic-based sampling methods for sexually transmissible infections screening in females aged 14–50 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Health 2013; 10: 559-69.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
8 Geisler WM. Diagnosis and management of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis infections in adolescents and adults: summary of evidence reviewed for the 2015 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases treatment guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61: S774-84.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
9 Marrazzo JM, Scholes D. Acceptability of urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic young men: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35: S28-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
10 Paudyal P, Llewellyn C, Lau J, Mahmud M, Smith H. Obtaining self-samples to diagnose curable sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review of patients’ experiences. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0124310.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
11 Pavlin NL, Gunn JM, Parker R, Fairley CK, Hocking J. Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Publ Health 2006; 6(1): 221.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
12 Ong JJ, Hongyun F, Smith MK, Tucker JD. Expanding syphilis testing: a scoping review of syphilis testing interventions among key populations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2018; 16: 423-32.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
13 Yared N, Horvath K, Fashanu O, Zhao R, Baker J, Kulasingam S. Optimizing screening for sexually transmitted infections in men using self-collected swabs: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45: 294-300.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
14 Jones HE, Altini L, de Kock A, Young T, van de Wijgert JH. Home-based versus clinic-based self-sampling and testing for sexually transmitted infections in Gugulethu, South Africa: randomised controlled trial. Sex Transm Infect 2007; 83: 552-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
15 Hobbs MM, van der Pol B, Totten P, Gaydos CA, Wald A, Warren T, et al. From the NIH: proceedings of a workshop on the importance of self-obtained vaginal specimens for detection of sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35(1): 8-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
16 Cristillo AD, Bristow CC, Peeling R, Van Der Pol B, de Cortina SH, Dimov IK, Pai NP, Jin Shin D, Chiu RY, Klapperich C, Madhivanan P, Morris SR, Klausner JD. Point-of-care sexually transmitted infection diagnostics: proceedings of the STAR sexually transmitted infection-clinical trial group programmatic meeting. Sex Transm Dis 2017; 44: 211-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
17 Garland SM, Tabrizi SN. Diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections (STI) using self-collected non-invasive specimens. Sex Health 2004; 1: 121-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
18 Potter Y. Self-screening for sexually transmitted infections. Nurs Stand 2014; 28: 37-43.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
20 Tao J, Napoleon SC, Maynard MA, Almonte A, Silva E, Toma E, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexually transmitted infection clinic visits. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48(1): e5-e7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
21 Tanne JH. Covid-19: Sexually transmitted diseases surged in US during pandemic. BMJ 2022; 377: o1275.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
22 Gottlieb SL, Spielman E, Abu-Raddad L, Aderoba AK, Bachmann LH, Blondeel K, et al. WHO global research priorities for sexually transmitted infections. Lancet Glob Health 2024; 12(9): e1544-51.
| Google Scholar |
23 Chang LW, Grabowski MK, Ssekubugu R, Nalugoda F, Kigozi G, Nantume B, et al. Heterogeneity of the HIV epidemic in agrarian, trading, and fishing communities in Rakai, Uganda: an observational epidemiological study. Lancet HIV 2016; 3(8): e388-96.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
24 Grabowski MK, Mpagazi J, Kiboneka S, Ssekubugu R, Kereba JB, Nakayijja A, et al. The HIV and sexually transmitted infection syndemic following mass scale-up of combination HIV interventions in two communities in southern Uganda: a population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Glob Health 2022; 10(12): e1825-34.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
25 Huang W, Gaydos CA, Barnes MR, Jett-Goheen M, Blake DR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening via internet-based self-collected swabs compared with clinic-based sample collection. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38: 815-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
26 Gaydos CA, Barnes M, Jett-Goheen M, Quinn N, Whittle P, Hogan T, Hsieh YH. Characteristics and predictors of women who obtain rescreening for sexually transmitted infections using the www.iwantthekit.org screening programme. Int J STD AIDS 2013; 24: 736-44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
27 Chai SJ, Aumakhan B, Barnes M, Jett-Goheen M, Quinn N, Agreda P, Whittle P, Hogan T, Jenkins WD, Rietmeijer CA, Gaydos CA. Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: risk factors for infection in men. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37: 756-63.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
28 Powell R, Pattison HM, Marriott JF. Perceptions of self-testing for chlamydia: understanding and predicting self-test use. Healthcare 2016; 4: 25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
30 LaMontagne DS, Fenton KA, Randall S, Anderson S, Carter P. Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening. Sex Transm Dis 2004; 80: 335-41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
32 Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 117.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
34 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
35 Njau B, Lisasi E, Damian DJ, Mushi DL, Boulle A, Mathews C. Feasibility of an HIV self-testing intervention: a formative qualitative study among individuals, community leaders, and HIV testing experts in northern Tanzania. BMC Publ Health 2020; 20(1): 490.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
36 Hlongwa M, Mashamba-Thompson T, Makhunga S, Muraraneza C, Hlongwana K. Men’s perspectives on HIV self-testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC Publ Health 2020; 20(1): 66.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
37 Harichund C, Moshabela M. Acceptability of HIV self-testing in Sub-Saharan Africa: scoping study. AIDS Behav 2018; 22(2): 560-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
38 Hamilton A, Thompson N, Choko AT, Hlongwa M, Jolly P, Korte JE, et al. HIV self-testing uptake and intervention strategies among men in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Front Publ Health 2021; 9: 594298.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
39 Jaya ZN, Mapanga W, Ogunsakin R, Mashamba-Thompson TP. Young women’s preferences for a self-sampling intervention to diagnose sexually transmitted infections: a discrete choice experiment [Preprint]. medRxiv 2024; Available at 06.03.24308383 Available at https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.03.24308383.
| Google Scholar |
40 Burke VM, Nakyanjo N, Ddaaki W, Payne C, Hutchinson N, Wawer MJ, et al. HIV self-testing values and preferences among sex workers, fishermen, and mainland community members in Rakai, Uganda: a qualitative study. PLoS One 2017; 12(8): e0183280.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
41 Madzima TR, Vahabi M, Lofters A. Emerging role of HPV self-sampling in cervical cancer screening for hard-to-reach women: focused literature review. Can Fam Physician 2017; 63(8): 597-601.
| Google Scholar |
42 World Health Organization. WHO releases new guidance to improve testing and diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections. Available at https://www.who.int/news/item/24-07-2023-who-releases-new-guidance-to-improve-testing-and-diagnosis-of-sexually-transmitted-infections [updated 24 July 2023]
43 Kersh EN, Shukla M, Raphael BH, Habel M, Park I. At-home specimen self-collection and self-testing for sexually transmitted infection screening demand accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of laboratory implementation issues. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59(11): e0264620.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
44 Indravudh PP, Choko AT, Corbett EL. Scaling up HIV self-testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of technology, policy and evidence. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2018; 31(1): 14-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
45 Ortblad KF, Sekhon M, Wang L, Roth S, van der Straten A, Simoni JM, et al. Acceptability assessment in HIV prevention and treatment intervention and service delivery research: a systematic review and qualitative analysis. AIDS Behav 2023; 27(2): 600-17.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
