Characteristics and determinants of quality non-directive pregnancy options counselling: a scoping review
Kari Dee Vallury
A B * , Amanda Asher A C , Olivia Sarri A C and Nicola Sheeran B
A
B
C
Abstract
Non-directive pregnancy options counselling (POC) is a core component of comprehensive reproductive health care for pregnant people wanting support in making a pregnancy outcome decision. Approximately one quarter of people with unintended pregnancies and people seeking abortion care seek POC. This study synthesises global evidence on access to and characteristics of quality non-directive POC. We searched five health databases in line with PRISMA guidelines. Primary research articles (published in English, 2011–2023) were included if they addressed provision, experiences, or characteristics of non-directive POC. Data were synthesised and organised thematically. Twelve of the 4021 unique citations identified were included in the review. Four themes were generated: (1) characteristics of quality non-directive POC; (2) provider-level determinants of care quality and provision; (3) patient level factors impacting the desire for and receipt of care; and (4) organisational setting and legal determinants of provision and quality of care. Abortion-related values and policies at the provider, organisational and legislative levels were the most common and salient determinants of POC access and quality. Quality POC includes non-directive, empathetic, compassionate discussions about all pregnancy options that convey non-judgement and respect. However, we identified provider, organisational setting, and legal level determinants that disproportionately impact access to POC for marginalised pregnant people. Research regarding POC access and quality outside of the USA is needed. Upskilling primary care and other health professionals in POC and embedding referral pathways to non-directive POC and abortion care will support Australia to achieve its commitment to universal access to reproductive health care by 2030.
Keywords: abortion, counselling, informed decision making, pregnancy, pregnancy options counselling, reproductive autonomy, reproductive health, review.
References
1 Australian Psychological Society. Pregnancy support counselling: medicare funded services; 2024. Available at https://psychology.org.au/psychology/medicare-rebates-psychological-services/medicare-rebates-pregnancy-services [accessed 27 August 2024]
2 Berglas NF, Williams V, Mark K, Roberts SCM. Should prenatal care providers offer pregnancy options counseling? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18(1): 384.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
3 Coleman-Minahan K. Pregnancy options counseling and abortion referral practices among Colorado nurse practitioners, nurse-midwives, and physician assistants. J Midwifery Womens Health 2021; 66(4): 470-477.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Nobel K, Ahrens K, Handler A, Holt K. Patient-reported experience with discussion of all options during pregnancy options counseling in the US South. Contraception 2022; 106: 68-74.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Rebić N, Gilbert K, Soon JA. “Now what?!” A practice tool for pharmacist-driven options counselling for unintended pregnancy. Can Pharm J 2021; 154(4): 248-255.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
6 Shaddeau A, Nimz A, Sheeder J, Tocce K. Effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling. Med Educ Online 2015; 20: 29401.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
7 American Academy of Paediatrics, Committee on Adolescence. Options counseling for the pregnant adolescent patient. Pediatrics 2022; 150(3): e2022058781.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
8 Children by Choice. Confidential & non-judgemental support for all pregnancy options; 2022. Updated 2024. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/ [accessed 27 August 2024]
9 Lupi C, Ward-Peterson M, Chang W. Advancing non-directive pregnancy options counseling skills: a pilot study on the use of blended learning with an online module and simulation. Contraception 2016; 94: 348-352.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Mavuso JM-JJ, Macleod CI. Contradictions in womxn’s experiences of pre-abortion counselling in South Africa: implications for client-centred practice. Nurs Inq 2020; 27: e12330.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
11 The Women’s. Pregnancy options counselling. Date unknown. Available at https://www.thewomens.org.au/health-information/unplanned-pregnancy-information/pregnancy-options-counselling [accessed 27 August 2024]
12 Children by Choice. Counselling; 2024. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/information-support/counselling/ [accessed 27 August 2024]
13 Vallury KD, Kelleher D, Mohd Soffi AS, Mogharbel C, Makleff S. Systemic delays to abortion access undermine the health and rights of abortion seekers across Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 63(4): 612-615.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Bell LA, Tyler CP, Russell MR, Szoko N, Harrison EI, Kazmerski TM, et al. Preferences and experiences regarding pregnancy options counseling in adolescence and young adulthood: a qualitative study. J Adolesc Health 2023; 73(1): 164-171.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Mahanaimy M, Gerdts C, Moseson H. What constitutes a good healthcare experience for unintended pregnancy? A qualitative study among young people in California. Cult Health Sex 2022; 24(3): 330-343.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 World Health Organization (WHO). Abortion care guideline; 2022. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240039483 [accessed 3 June 2024]
17 Michelson J. 33. What women want when faced with an unplanned pregnancy. Sex Health 2007; 4(4): 297.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
18 Australian Government. Medicare item reports. Services Australia - Statistics - Item Reports; 2024. Available at humanservices.gov.au [accessed 20 June 2024]
19 Children by Choice. Submission to the Universal access to reproductive healthcare senate enquiry. CbyC- Senate Inquiry; 2022. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CbyC-Senate-Inquiry-2022.pdf [accessed 27 August 2024]
20 Goenee MS, Donker GA, Picavet C, Wijsen C. Decision-making concerning unwanted pregnancy in general practice. Fam Pract 2014; 31(5): 564-570.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 Hasstedt K. Unbiased information on and referral for all pregnancy options are essential to informed consent in reproductive health care. 2018; Available at Vol. 21: Guttmacher Policy Review Available at https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2018/01/unbiased-information-and-referral-all-pregnancy-options-are-essential-informed-consent.
| Google Scholar |
22 Shelley JM, Kavanagh S, Graham M, Mayes C. Use of pregnancy counselling services in Australia 2007–2012. Aust N Z J Public Health 2015; 39: 77-81.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
23 Wallace ME, Evans MG, Theall K. The status of women’s reproductive rights and adverse birth outcomes. Womens Health Issues 2017; 27(2): 121-128.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
25 Bain LE. Mandatory pre-abortion counseling is a barrier to accessing safe abortion services. Pan Afr Med J 2020; 35: 80.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
26 Dobkin LM, Perrucci AC, Dehlendorf C. Pregnancy options counseling for adolescents: overcoming barriers to care and preserving preference. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2013; 43(4): 96-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(7): 467-473.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf 2018; 34(4): 285-291.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
29 Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z (Eds). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2024. Available at https://synthesismanual.jbi.global, https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01
30 Schick-Makaroff K, MacDonald M, Plummer M, Burgess J, Neander W. What synthesis methodology should I use? a review and analysis of approaches to research synthesis. AIMS Public Health 2016; 3(1): 172-215.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
31 Oberman M, Lehmann LS. Doctors’ duty to provide abortion information. J Law Biosci 2023; 10(2): lsad024.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
32 Chor J, Tusken M, Lyman P, Gilliam M. Factors shaping women’s pre-abortion communication with their regular gynecologic care providers. Womens Health Issues 2016; 26(4): 437-441.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
33 French VA, Steinauer JE, Kimport K. What women want from their health care providers about pregnancy options counseling: a qualitative study. Womens Health Issues 2017; 27(6): 715-720.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
34 Holt K, Janiak E, McCormick MC, Lieberman E, Dehlendorf C, Kajeepeta S, et al. Pregnancy options counseling and abortion referrals among US primary care physicians: results from a national survey. Fam Med 2017; 49(7): 527-536 Available at https://www.stfm.org/FamilyMedicine/Vol49Issue7/Holt527.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
35 Ryan M, Nolan A, Vallières F. Lifting the cloak of secrecy: experiences of providing crisis pregnancy counselling in a changing legislative context in Ireland. Couns Psychother Res 2022; 22: 22-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
36 White K, Adams K, Hopkins K. Counseling and referrals for women with unplanned pregnancies at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas. Contraception 2019; 99(1): 48-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
37 Marcella JS.. The title X program: setting standards for contraceptive and health equity. Am J Publ Health 2022; 112(S5): S511-S514.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
38 Fiol V, Briozzo L, Labandera A, Recchi V, Piñeyro M. Improving care of women at risk of unsafe abortion: implementing a risk-reduction model at the Uruguayan-Brazilian border. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2012; 118: S21-S27.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
39 Mavuso JM-JJ, Macleod CI. ‘Bad choices’: unintended pregnancy and abortion in nurses’ and counsellors’ accounts of providing pre-abortion counselling. Health 2021; 25(5): 555-573.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
40 Keogh LA, Gillam L, Bismark M, McNamee K, Webster A, Bayly C, et al. Conscientious objection to abortion, the law and its implementation in Victoria, Australia: perspectives of abortion service providers. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20: 11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
41 Lu D, Davey M. ‘I was shocked’: Catholic-run public hospitals refuse to provide birth control and abortion. The Guardian; 2023. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/aug/22/do-australian-catholic-hospitals-perform-abortions-provide-contraception-reproductive-care [accessed 27 August 2024]
42 Foster DG, Jackson RA, Cosby K, Weitz TA, Darney PD, Drey EA. Predictors of delay in each step leading to an abortion. Contraception 2008; 77(4): 289-293.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
43 IPSOS. Global views on abortion in 2021; 2021. Available at https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2021-09/Global-views-on-abortion-report-2021.pdf
44 Foster DG, Gould H, Taylor J, Weitz TA. Attitudes and decision making among women seeking abortions at one U.S. clinic. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2012; 44(2): 117-124.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
45 Makleff S, Wilkins R, Wachsmann H, Gupta D, Wachira M, Bunde W, et al. Exploring stigma and social norms in women’s abortion experiences and their expectations of care. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2019; 27(3): 1661753.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
46 Rowland BB, Rocca CH, Ralph LJ. Certainty and intention in pregnancy decision-making: an exploratory study. Contraception 2021; 103(2): 80-85.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
47 Makleff S, Belfrage M, Wickramasinghe S, Fisher J, Bateson D, Black KI. Typologies of interactions between abortion seekers and healthcare workers in Australia: a qualitative study exploring the impact of stigma on quality of care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23(1): 646.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
48 Hornberger LL, Committee on adolescence. Diagnosis of pregnancy and providing options counseling for the adolescent patient. Pediatrics 2017; 140(3): e20172273.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
49 Moss DA. Counseling patients with unintended pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 2015; 91(8): 574-576 Available at https://www.aafp.org/dam/brand/aafp/pubs/afp/issues/2015/0415/p574.pdf.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
50 Oswalt SB, Eastman-Mueller HP, Baldwin A. Counseling college students after a positive pregnancy test: trends in practice. J Am Coll Health 2021; 69(2): 227-231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
51 Kimport K. Pregnant women’s experiences of crisis pregnancy centers: when abortion stigmatization succeeds and fails. Symb Interact 2019; 42(4): 618-639.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
52 Owens SN, Shorter JM. Pregnancy options counseling. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 34(6): 386-390.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
53 Bury L, Aliaga Bruch S, Machicao Barbery X, Garcia Pimentel F. Hidden realities: what women do when they want to terminate an unwanted pregnancy in Bolivia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 118(S1): S4-S9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
54 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Supreme court of the United States. p. 3; 2022. Available at supremecourt.gov, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf
55 Osborne D, Huang Y, Overall NC, Sutton RM, Petterson A, Douglas KM, et al. Abortion attitudes: an overview of demographic and ideological differences. Polit Psychol 2022; 43: 29-76.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
56 Birdsey G, Crankshaw TL, Mould S, Ramklass SS. Unmet counselling need amongst women accessing an induced abortion service in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Contraception 2016; 94(5): 473-477.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
