Perceptions, experiences and concerns with sexually transmitted infections among current and former PrEP users: a longitudinal qualitative study of gay, bisexual and queer men in Canada
Emerich Daroya
A B , Alex Wells C , Mark Gaspar A , Jad Sinno A , Mark Hull D , Nathan J. Lachowsky C , Darrell H. S. Tan A E and Daniel Grace A *
A
B
C
D
E
Abstract
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use has been attributed to heightened rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), ostensibly due to increased condomless anal sex (CAS) and greater frequency of STI testing. Few qualitative studies have assessed how gay, bisexual and queer men (GBQM) who use PrEP perceive STIs and how these attitudes have evolved post-PrEP uptake. We investigated the perspectives of current and former PrEP users on STIs.
Annual, in-depth longitudinal interviews were conducted with 38 current and former PrEP users in Ontario (n = 18) and British Columbia (n = 20), Canada, as part of a mixed-methods implementation science study (2020–2022). Over 3 years, 109 interviews were conducted. Data analysis included reflexive thematic coding and longitudinal recurrent cross-sectional analysis using NVivo 12.
Four STI-related themes emerged: (1) lack of STI-related concerns due to treatment and prevention optimism, (2) stigma-related concerns, (3) perceived risk among other PrEP users due to increased CAS, and (4) inconsistent testing concerns among non-PrEP users. Over time, some STI-related anxieties decreased with increased knowledge and reduced stigma. However, concerns persisted for other participants due to perceived risky sexual behaviours among other PrEP users and non-PrEP users. Both current and former PrEP users who expressed STI-related apprehensions consistently indicated adopting risk-reduction strategies, including condom use and having fewer sexual partners throughout the study.
Findings show how varied STI perceptions and experiences among current and former PrEP users shaped sexual decision-making over time. Providers, public health experts, and policymakers should develop a more comprehensive strategy to address STI concerns among GBQM.
Keywords: Canada, gay, bisexual, and queer men, GBQM, HIV, longitudinal, MSM, pre-exposure prophylaxis, PrEP, qualitative, risk perceptions, sexual behaviour, sexual health, sexually transmitted infections, stigma, STIs.
References
2 Grov C, Westmoreland DA, D’Angelo AB, et al. How has HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) changed sex? A review of research in a new era of bio-behavioral HIV prevention. J Sex Res 2021; 58(7): 891-913.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Newcomb ME, Moran K, Feinstein BA, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use and condomless anal sex: evidence of risk compensation in a cohort of young men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 77(4): 358-364.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Kumar S, Haderxhanaj LT, Spicknall IH. Reviewing PrEP’s effect on STI incidence among men who have sex with men—balancing increased STI Screening and potential behavioral sexual risk compensation. AIDS Behav 2021; 25(6): 1810-1818.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Ramchandani MS, Golden MR. Confronting rising STIs in the era of PrEP and treatment as prevention. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2019; 16(3): 244-256.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Werner RN, Gaskins M, Nast A, et al. Correction: Incidence of sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men and who are at substantial risk of HIV infection – a meta-analysis of data from trials and observational studies of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. PLoS ONE 2019; 14(12): e0226209.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Freeborn K, Portillo CJ. Does pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men change risk behaviour? A systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27(17–18): 3254-3265.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Powell VE, Gibas KM, DuBow J, et al. Update on HIV preexposure prophylaxis: effectiveness, drug resistance, and risk compensation. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2019; 21(8): 28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
9 Sarno EL, Macapagal K, Newcomb ME. “The main concern is HIV, everything else is fixable”: indifference toward sexually transmitted infections in the era of biomedical HIV prevention. AIDS Behav 2021; 25(8): 2657-2660.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Klasko-Foster L, Wilson K, Bleasdale J, et al. “Shades of risk”: understanding current PrEP users’ sexually transmitted infection perceptions. AIDS Care 2022; 34(3): 353-358.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Nath R, Grennan T, Parry R, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of syphilis and syphilis pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men in Vancouver, Canada: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2019; 9(11): e031239.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Rotsaert A, Nöstlinger C, Van Landeghem E, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis users’ attitudes about sexually transmitted infections and its influence on condom use: a mixed-method study in Belgium. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2022; 36(12): 483-492.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Freddie. PrEP Clinic in British Columbia. 2024. Available at https://www.gofreddie.com/british-columbia [accessed 6 November 2023]
14 Freddie. PrEP Clinic in Ontario. 2024. Available at https://www.gofreddie.com/ontario [accessed 6 November 2023]
15 Grace D, Gaspar M, Wells A, et al. Injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: perspectives on the benefits and barriers from gay, bisexual, and queer men and health system stakeholders in Ontario, Canada. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2023; 37(6): 306-315.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Gaspar M, Grey C, Wells A, et al. Public health morality, sex, and COVID-19: sexual minority men’s HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) decision-making during Ontario’s first COVID-19 lockdown. Crit Public Health 2022; 32(1): 116-126.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
17 Grace D, Daroya E, Gaspar M, et al. Gay, bisexual, and queer men’s confidence in the Undetectable equals Untransmittable HIV prevention message: longitudinal qualitative analysis of the sexual decision-making of pre-exposure prophylaxis users over time. Sex Health 2023; 20(3): 223-231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 Daroya E, Wells A, Gaspar M, et al. Navigating patterns of oral PrEP use: a qualitative longitudinal study of gay, bisexual, and queer men’s dynamic practices of pausing, on-demand, and stopping PrEP in Canada. SSM - Qualit Res Health 2024; 5: 100446.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
19 Canadian Paediatric Society. Medical decision-making in paediatrics: infancy to adolescence. Canadian Paediatric Society. 2018. Available at https://cps.ca/documents/position/medical-decision-making-in-paediatrics-infancy-to-adolescence [accessed 6 December 2023]
20 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
21 Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2019; 11(4): 589-597.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
22 Grossoehme D, Lipstein E. Analyzing longitudinal qualitative data: the application of trajectory and recurrent cross-sectional approaches. BMC Res Notes 2016; 9(1): 136.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
23 Grace D, Chown SA, Kwag M, et al. Becoming “Undetectable”: longitudinal narratives of gay men’s sex lives after a recent HIV diagnosis. AIDS Edu Prev 2015; 27(4): 333-349.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Health Initiative for Men. Doxycycline PEP and PrEP. Health Initiative for Men (HIM). 2022. Available at https://checkhimout.ca/doxycycline/ [accessed 25 May 2023]
25 Earnshaw V, Kalichman SC. Stigma experienced by people living with HIV/AIDS. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Stigma, discrimination and living with HIV/AIDS: a cross-cultural perspective. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media; 2013. pp. 23–38. 10.1007/978-94-007-6324-1
26 Kolstee J, Prestage G, Bavinton B, et al. Trust, familiarity, optimism, and pleasure: Australian gay men accounting for inconsistent HIV prevention practices in the prep era. Arch Sex Behav 2022; 51(5): 2563-2570.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Holt M, Bernard D, Race K, et al. Gay men’s perceptions of sexually transmissible infections and their experiences of diagnosis: ‘part of the way of life’ to feeling ‘dirty and ashamed’. Sex Health 2010; 7(4): 411-416.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Duncan B, Hart G, Scoular A, et al. Qualitative analysis of psychosocial impact of diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis: implications for screening. BMJ 2001; 322(7280): 195-199.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
29 Calabrese SK, Underhill K. How stigma surrounding the use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis undermines prevention and pleasure: a call to destigmatize “Truvada whores”. Am J Public Health 2015; 105(10): 1960-1964.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
30 Martinez-Lacabe A. The PrEP response in England: enabling collective action through public health and PrEP commodity activism. Crit Public Health 2021; 31(2): 226-234.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
