Termination of pregnancy in Queensland post-decriminalisation: a content analysis of client records from an all-options pregnancy counselling organisation
Maryanne Cleetus
A * , Mattea Lazarou A , Siân Tooker B , Bec Jenkinson B and Judith A. Dean A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia.
B Children by Choice, Suite 3B Level 3/49 Sherwood Road, Toowong, Qld 4066, Australia.
Sexual Health 19(6) 491-500 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH22059
Submitted: 28 March 2022 Accepted: 4 July 2022 Published: 28 July 2022
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY)
Abstract
Background: Termination of pregnancy (ToP) was decriminalised in Queensland, Australia, in December 2018. Although approximately 14 000 terminations are performed in Queensland annually, decriminalisation had addressed a known barrier to ToP access by supporting the legal right to access and enabling safe and regulated public pathways to ToP care. The post-decriminalised ToP experience in Queensland is unknown. Therefore, this study explored the reported reasons clients access information and support from an all-options pregnancy counselling service in Queensland with the aim of identifying the facilitators and barriers accessing ToP that remain post-decriminalisation in Queensland.
Methods: A two-part qualitative conventional and directed content analysis approach guided by the Socioecological Model was used to examine counsellor notes on interactions with clients (n = 1933) between December 2018 and June 2020 at an all-options pregnancy counselling service in Queensland.
Findings: Key reasons for contacting the service were for financial assistance, ToP information, and support for decision making. Facilitators and barriers affecting ToP access interconnected across the Socioecological Model levels highlighting affordability, violence, stigma, knowledge, and information as key factors influencing ToP access post-decriminalisation in Queensland.
Conclusions: Inclusive multisectoral action to support reproductive autonomy is needed in Queensland. Following decriminalisation, cost, stigma, and intimate partner violence continue to impede access to safe, compassionate, and timely abortion care. Future models of care must eliminate these barriers by developing public models of service provision, investing in workforce development, fully utilising the capacity of that workforce, and creating stronger connections between sexual and reproductive health and intimate partner violence services.
Keywords: abortion, access, Australia, barriers, Queensland, reproductive health, unplanned pregnancy, unwanted pregnancy.
References
[1] State of Queensland (Queensland Health). Key facts about the Termination of Pregnancy Act. Queensland: State of Queensland, Queensland Health; 2019. Available at https://clinicalexcellence.qld.gov.au/sites/default/files/docs/priority-area/termination-pregnancy/termination-pregnancy-act-facts.PDF [verified 26 April 2021][2] The State of Queensland 1995-2020. Interesting facts about Queensland. The State of Queensland 1995-2020; 2017. Available at https://www.qld.gov.au/about/about-queensland/statistics-facts/facts [verified 26 April 2021]
[3] Sharman LS, Douglas H, Price E, Sheeran N, Dingle GA. Associations between unintended pregnancy, domestic violence, and sexual assault in a population of Queensland women. Psychiatry Psychol Law 2019; 26 541–52.
| Associations between unintended pregnancy, domestic violence, and sexual assault in a population of Queensland women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian public assessment report for mifepristone/misoprostol. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2014. Available at https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-mifepristone-misoprostol-141013.pdf [verified 26 April 2021]
[5] The State of Queensland (Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel). Termination of Pregnancy Act 2018 (Qld), Act No. 23 of 2018 (25 October 2018). Available at https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/asmade/act-2018-023 [verified 20 July 2022]
[6] The State of Queensland (Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel). Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld), (29 August 2014). Available at https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/inforce/2014-08-29/act-1899-009 [verified 20 July 2022]
[7] de Costa CM, Russell DB, de Costa NR, Carrette M, McNamee HM. Early medical abortion in Cairns, Queensland: July 2006 – April 2007. Med J Aus 2007; 187 171–3.
| Early medical abortion in Cairns, Queensland: July 2006 – April 2007.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health system overview. Canberra: AIHW; 2020. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/health-system-overview [verified 10 December 2021]
[9] Lie M, Robson SC, May CR. Experiences of abortion: a narrative review of qualitative studies. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8 150
| Experiences of abortion: a narrative review of qualitative studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Public Health Association Australia. PHAA policy statement on: abortion policy statement. Canberra Public Health Association Australia; 2017. Available at https://www.phaa.net.au/documents/item/2504 [verified 26 April 2021]
[11] World Health Organization. Abortion. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available at https://www.who.int/health-topics/abortion#tab=tab_1 [verified 26 April 2021]
[12] Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Best practice in abortion care. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2022. Available at https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/geify5bx/abortion-care-best-practice-paper-april-2022.pdf
[13] Turner KL, Börjesson E, Huber A, Mulligan C. Abortion care for young women: a training toolkit. Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas; 2011. Available at https://www.ipas.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ACYTKE14-AbortionCareForYoungWomen.pdf [verified 9 June 2022]
[14] Turner KL, Huber A. Woman-centered, comprehensive abortion care: reference manual. 2nd edn. Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas; 2013. Available at https://www.ipas.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ACREFE16-WomenCenteredCACReferenceManual.pdf [verified 9 June 2022]
[15] Ross L, Solinger R. Reproductive justice: an introduction. Oakland, CA: University California Press; 2017.
[16] Ipas. Toward a sustainable abortion ecosystem: a frame-work for program design, action and evaluation. Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas; 2020. Available at https://ipascam.org/documents/Framework%20for%20a%20Sustainable%20Abortion%20Ecosystem.pdf [verified 9 June 2022]
[17] Ireland S, Belton S, Doran F. ‘I didn’t feel judged’: exploring women’s access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia. J Prim Health Care 2020; 12 49–56.
| ‘I didn’t feel judged’: exploring women’s access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] LaRoche KJ, Wynn LL, Foster AM. “We’ve got rights and yet we don’t have access”: exploring patient experiences accessing medication abortion in Australia. Contraception 2020; 101 256–60.
| “We’ve got rights and yet we don’t have access”: exploring patient experiences accessing medication abortion in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Doran F, Hornibrook J. Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia. Rural Remote Health 2016; 16 3538
| Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Newton D, Bayly C, McNamee K, Hardiman A, Bismark M, Webster A, et al. How do women seeking abortion choose between surgical and medical abortion? Perspectives from abortion service providers. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 56 523–9.
| How do women seeking abortion choose between surgical and medical abortion? Perspectives from abortion service providers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Downing SG, Cashman C, Russell DB. Ten years on: a review of medical terminations of pregnancy performed in a sexual health clinic. Sex Health 2017; 14 208–12.
| Ten years on: a review of medical terminations of pregnancy performed in a sexual health clinic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Rowe H, Holton S, Kirkman M, Bayly C, Jordan L, McNamee K, et al. Abortion: findings from women and men participating in the Understanding Fertility Management in contemporary Australia national survey. Sex Health 2017; 14 566–73.
| Abortion: findings from women and men participating in the Understanding Fertility Management in contemporary Australia national survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Taft AJ, Powell RL, Watson LF, Lucke JC, Mazza D, McNamee K. Factors associated with induced abortion over time: secondary data analysis of five waves of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Aust N Z J Public Health 2019; 43 137–42.
| Factors associated with induced abortion over time: secondary data analysis of five waves of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Commonwealth of Australia. National Women’s Health Strategy 2020-2030. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2018. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/national-womens-health-strategy-2020-2030 [verified 20 May 2021]
[25] Queensland Government. Queensland sexual health framework. The State of Queensland (Queensland Health) 1996-2022; 2022. Available at https://www.health.qld.gov.au/public-health/topics/sexual-health/strategy [verified 11 June 2022]
[26] Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 1277–88.
| Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Children By Choice Association Incorporated. Our work. Brisbane: Children by Choice; 2020. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/about/our-work/ [verified 20 July 2022]
[28] Children By Choice Association Incorporated. Supporting pregnant women. Brisbane: Children by Choice; 2016. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/for-professionals/support-counselling/ [verified 20 July 2022]
[29] Children By Choice Association Incorporated. Privacy policy. Brisbane: Children by Choice; 2020. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/privacy-policy [verified 26 April 2021]
[30] Golden TL, Wendel ML. Public health’s next step in advancing equity: re-evaluating epistemological assumptions to move social determinants from theory to practice. Front Public Health 2020; 8 131
| Public health’s next step in advancing equity: re-evaluating epistemological assumptions to move social determinants from theory to practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988; 15 351–77.
| An ecological perspective on health promotion programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Sifris R, Penovic T. Barriers to abortion access in Australia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women’s Stud Int Forum 2021; 86 102470
| Barriers to abortion access in Australia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Shankar M, Black KI, Goldstone P, Hussainy S, Mazza D, Petersen K, et al. Access, equity and costs of induced abortion services in Australia: a cross-sectional study. Aust N Z J Public Health 2017; 41 309–14.
| Access, equity and costs of induced abortion services in Australia: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Baird B, Millar E. Abortion at the edges: politics, practices, performances. Women’s Stud Int Forum 2020; 80 102372
| Abortion at the edges: politics, practices, performances.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Children By Choice Association Incorporated. Annual report 18/19 2019. Brisbane: Children by Choice; 2019. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1819AnnualReport.pdf [verified 4 May 2021]
[36] Williams GB, Brackley MH. Intimate partner violence, pregnancy and the decision for abortion. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2009; 30 272–8.
| Intimate partner violence, pregnancy and the decision for abortion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[37] Australian Bureau of Statistics. Personal safety, Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2017. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/personal-safety-australia/latest-release [verified 26 April 2021]
[38] Downing S, Dean J, Mainey L, Balnaves M-C, Peberdy L, Peacock A, et al. Unintended pregnancy prevention and care education: are we adequately preparing entry-to-practice nursing and midwifery students? Aust Nurs Midwife J 2020; 17 32–3.
[39] Mainey L, O’Mullan C, Reid-Searl K, Taylor A, Baird K. The role of nurses and midwives in the provision of abortion care: a scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29 1513–26.
| The role of nurses and midwives in the provision of abortion care: a scoping review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[40] Subasinghe AK, McGeechan K, Moulton JE, Grzeskowiak LE, Mazza D. Early medical abortion services provided in Australian primary care. Med J Aust 2021; 215 366–70.
| Early medical abortion services provided in Australian primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Goldstone P, Walker C, Hawtin K. Efficacy and safety of mifepristone-buccal misoprostol for early medical abortion in an Australian clinical setting. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 57 366–71.
| Efficacy and safety of mifepristone-buccal misoprostol for early medical abortion in an Australian clinical setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[42] Mazza D, Deb S, Subasighe A. Telehealth: an opportunity to increase access to early medical abortion for Australian women. Med J Aust 2020; 213 298–9.e1.
| Telehealth: an opportunity to increase access to early medical abortion for Australian women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[43] Hayes T, Keane C, Hurley S. Counselling “late women” – the experience of women seeking abortion in the eighteen to twenty-four week gestational period: critical reflections from three abortion counsellors. Women’s Stud Int Forum 2020; 78 102327
| Counselling “late women” – the experience of women seeking abortion in the eighteen to twenty-four week gestational period: critical reflections from three abortion counsellors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[44] Hudspith A, Paterson H, Caldwell C, Whiting R. Leaps ahead in law but not in practice: Why we need to train in second trimester abortion care. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 62 140–6.
| Leaps ahead in law but not in practice: Why we need to train in second trimester abortion care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[45] Malatzky C, Hulm A. ‘I love my job…it’s more the systems that we work in’: the challenges encountered by rural sexual and reproductive health practitioners and implications for access to care. Cult Health Sex 2022; 24 735–49.
| ‘I love my job…it’s more the systems that we work in’: the challenges encountered by rural sexual and reproductive health practitioners and implications for access to care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[46] Children By Choice Association Incorporated. Abortion & contraception services. Brisbane: Children by Choice; 2022. Available at https://findaservice.childrenbychoice.org.au/#5,-17.581194026506008,146.18408203125003 [verified 10 December 2021]
[47] Boxall H, Morgan A, Brown R. The prevalence of domestic violence among women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Statistical Bulletin 28. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2020. Available at https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-07/sb28_prevalence_of_domestic_violence_among_women_during_covid-19_pandemic.pdf [verified 20 May 2021]
[48] Romanis EC, Parsons JA. Legal and policy responses to the delivery of abortion care during COVID-19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 151 479–86.
| Legal and policy responses to the delivery of abortion care during COVID-19.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
