Risky business: is pubic hair removal by women associated with body image and sexual health?
Stephanie L. Grossman A B and Rachel A. Annunziato A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Psychology, Fordham University, 441 E. Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458, USA.
B Corresponding author. Email: sgrossman11@fordham.edu
Sexual Health 15(3) 269-275 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH17154
Submitted: 22 August 2017 Accepted: 25 November 2017 Published: 30 April 2018
Abstract
Background: Body hair removal is a behaviour that has become normative among women in Westernised cultures, and is presented by the media as the feminine ideal, despite being painful and a potential cause of infection. Of concern, removal may be part of a more global pattern of appearance dissatisfaction and risky sexual behaviour. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationships among pubic hair removal, body image and sexual health indicators. Methods: Women (n = 264; Mage = 33.82, s.d. = 11.13, range = 18–66) completed self-report questionnaires assessing these constructs, including an assessment of body hair removal practices. Results: Greater appearance concerns (as measured by thin-ideal internalisation, appearance investment and self-objectification) and sexual health indicators (i.e. less condom use self-efficacy when a partner disapproves of condom use) all predicted greater importance of reasons for pubic hair removal (R2 = 0.315, F(8184) = 9.97, P < 0.001), controlling for age groups. Additionally, women who removed a greater amount of hair reported more thin-ideal internalisation and appearance investment than those who removed less hair. Conclusions: Women who express stronger reasoning for pubic hair removal, and remove a larger amount of it, may endorse problematic beliefs and behaviours particularly related to appearance concerns. It is important for practitioners to consider this practice as distinct from grooming and to be aware of its association with a broader array of risky beliefs and behaviours that can compromise women’s well-being.
Additional keywords: pubic hair, self-objectification, sexual attitudes, sexual risk taking.
References
[1] Tiggemann M. The hairlessness norm: the removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles 1998; 39 873–85.| The hairlessness norm: the removal of body hair in women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Toerien M, Wilkinson S, Choi PL. Body hair removal: the “mundane” production of normative femininity. Sex Roles 2005; 52 399–406.
| Body hair removal: the “mundane” production of normative femininity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Basow SA. The hairless ideal: women and their body hair. Psychol Women Q 1991; 15 83–96.
| The hairless ideal: women and their body hair.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Tiggemann M, Hodgson S. The hairlessness norm extended: reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites. Sex Roles 2008; 59 889–97.
| The hairlessness norm extended: reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Schick VR, Rima BN, Calabrese SK. E vulva lution: the portrayal of women’s external genitalia and physique across time and the current Barbie doll ideals. J Sex Res 2011; 48 74–81.
| E vulva lution: the portrayal of women’s external genitalia and physique across time and the current Barbie doll ideals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Bercaw-Pratt JL, Santos XM, Sanchez J, Ayensu-Coker L, Nebgen DR, Dietrich JE. The incidence, attitudes and practices of the removal of pubic hair as a body modification. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2012; 25 12–4.
| The incidence, attitudes and practices of the removal of pubic hair as a body modification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Glass AS, Bagga HS, Tasian GE, Fisher PB, McCulloch CE, Blaschko SD, McAnnich JW, Breyer BN. Pubic hair grooming injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments. Urology 2012; 80 1187–91.
| Pubic hair grooming injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Butler SM, Smith NK, Collazo E, Caltabiano L, Herbenick D. Pubic hair preferences, reasons for removal, and associated genital symptoms: comparisons between men and women. J Sex Med 2015; 12 48–58.
| Pubic hair preferences, reasons for removal, and associated genital symptoms: comparisons between men and women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] DeMaria AL, Flores M, Hirth JM, Berenson AB. Complications related to pubic hair removal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 528.e1–5.
| Complications related to pubic hair removal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders S, Dennis Fortenberry J. Pubic hair removal among women in the United States: prevalence, methods, and characteristics. J Sex Med 2010; 7 3322–30.
| Pubic hair removal among women in the United States: prevalence, methods, and characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] DeMaria AL, Berenson AB. Prevalence and correlates of pubic hair grooming among low-income hispanic, black, and white women. Body Image 2013; 10 226–31.
| Prevalence and correlates of pubic hair grooming among low-income hispanic, black, and white women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Herbenick D, Hensel D, Smith NK, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders SA, Fortenberry JD. Pubic hair removal and sexual behavior: findings from a prospective daily diary study of sexually active women in the United States. J Sex Med 2013; 10 678–85.
| Pubic hair removal and sexual behavior: findings from a prospective daily diary study of sexually active women in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Rowen TS, Gaither TW, Awad MA, Osterberg EC, Shindel AW, Breyer BN. Pubic hair grooming prevalence and motivation among women in the United States. JAMA Dermatol 2016; 152 1106–13.
| Pubic hair grooming prevalence and motivation among women in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Weaver AD, Byers ES. The relationships among body image, body mass index, exercise, and sexual functioning in heterosexual women. Psychol Women Q 2006; 30 333–9.
| The relationships among body image, body mass index, exercise, and sexual functioning in heterosexual women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Eisenberg ME, Neumark-Sztainer D, Lust KD. Weight-related issues and high-risk sexual behaviors among college students. J Am Coll Health 2005; 54 95–101.
| Weight-related issues and high-risk sexual behaviors among college students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Gillen MM, Lefkowitz ES, Shearer CL. Does body image play a role in risky sexual behavior and attitudes? J Youth Adolesc 2006; 35 230–42.
| Does body image play a role in risky sexual behavior and attitudes?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Impett EA, Schooler D, Tolman DL. To be seen and not heard: femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Arch Sex Behav 2006; 35 131–44.
| To be seen and not heard: femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Blashill AJ, Safren SA. Body dissatisfaction and condom use self-efficacy: a meta-analysis. Body Image 2015; 12 73–7.
| Body dissatisfaction and condom use self-efficacy: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Manago AM, Monique Ward L, Lemm KM, Reed L, Seabrook R. Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles 2015; 72 1–14.
| Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Braun V, Tricklebank G, Clark V. It shouldn’t stick out from your bikini at the beach: meaning, gender, and the hairy/hairless body. Psychol Women Q 2013; 37(4) 478–93.
| It shouldn’t stick out from your bikini at the beach: meaning, gender, and the hairy/hairless body.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Smolak L, Murnen SK. Gender, self-objectification and pubic hair removal. Sex Roles 2011; 65 506–17.
| Gender, self-objectification and pubic hair removal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] DeMaria AL, Sundstrom B, McInnis SM, Rogers E. Perceptions and correlates of pubic hair removal and grooming among college-aged women: a mixed methods approach. Sex Health 2016; 13 248–56.
[23] Osterberg EC, Gaither TW, Awad MA, Truesdale MD, Allen I, Sutcliffe S, Breyer BN. Correlation between pubic hair grooming and STIs: results from a nationally representative probability sample. Sex Transm Infect 2017; 93 162–6.
| Correlation between pubic hair grooming and STIs: results from a nationally representative probability sample.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Fayet F, Petocz P, Samman S. Prevalence and correlates of dieting in college women: a cross sectional study. Int J Women’s Health 2012; 4 405–11.
[25] Toerien M, Wilkinson S. Gender and body hair: constructing the feminine woman. Women’s Stud Int Forum 2003; 26 333–44.
| Gender and body hair: constructing the feminine woman.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Perspect Psychol Sci 2011; 6 3–5.
| Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Thompson JK, Van Den Berg P, Roehrig M, Guarda AS, Heinberg LJ. The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Scale-3 (SATAQ-3): development and validation. Int J Eat Disord 2004; 35 293–304.
| The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Scale-3 (SATAQ-3): development and validation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Calogero RM, Davis WN, Thompson JK. The Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire (SATAQ-3): reliability and normative comparisons of eating disordered patients. Body Image 2004; 1 193–8.
| The Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire (SATAQ-3): reliability and normative comparisons of eating disordered patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Noll SM, Fredrickson BL. A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Pscyhology of Women Quarterly 1998; 22 623–36.
[30] Cash TF, Melnyk SE, Hrabosky JI. The assessment of body image investment: an extensive revision of the Appearance Schemas Inventory. Int J Eat Disord 2004; 35 305–16.
| The assessment of body image investment: an extensive revision of the Appearance Schemas Inventory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Brafford LJ, Beck KH. Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. J Am Coll Health 1991; 39 219–25.
| Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK387ksl2luw%3D%3D&md5=c5352d233366429e7c9b20a5e2b3a7f2CAS |
[32] Brien TM, Thombs DL, Mahoney CA, Wallnau L. Dimensions of self-efficacy among three distinct groups of condom users. J Am Coll Health 1994; 42 167–74.
| Dimensions of self-efficacy among three distinct groups of condom users.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7nvFKkug%3D%3D&md5=26826b376cec9d619eea494536a10c8eCAS |
[33] Barkley TW, Burns JL. Factor analysis of the Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale among multicultural college students. Health Educ Res 2000; 15 485–9.
| Factor analysis of the Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale among multicultural college students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Lefkowitz ES, Espinosa-Hernandez G. Sex-related communication with mothers and close friends during the transition to university. J Sex Res 2007; 44 17–27.
| Sex-related communication with mothers and close friends during the transition to university.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Metzler CW, Noell J, Biglan A. The validation of a construct of high-risk sexual behavior in heterosexual adolescents. J Adolesc Res 1992; 7 233–49.
| The validation of a construct of high-risk sexual behavior in heterosexual adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[36] Metzler CW, Noell J, Biglan A, Ary D, Smolkowski K. The social context for risky sexual behavior among adolescents. J Behav Med 1994; 17 419–38.
| The social context for risky sexual behavior among adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FlsFKktQ%3D%3D&md5=6cc7c3e1cfed35577cd066c433893728CAS |
[37] Ramsey S, Sweeney C, Fraser M, Oades G. Pubic hair and sexuality: a review. J Sex Med 2009; 6 2102–10.
| Pubic hair and sexuality: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[38] Rudd NA, Lennon SJ. Body image and appearance-management behaviors in college women. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 2000; 18 152–62.
| Body image and appearance-management behaviors in college women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[39] Toerien M, Wilkinson S. Exploring the depilation norm: a qualitative questionnaire study of women’s body hair removal. Qual Res Psychol 2004; 1 69–92.
[40] Stice E, Shaw HE. Adverse effects of the media portrayed thin-ideal on women and linkages to bulimic symptomatology. J Soc Clin Psychol 1994; 13 288–308.
| Adverse effects of the media portrayed thin-ideal on women and linkages to bulimic symptomatology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Fahs B. Dreaded otherness: heteronormative patrolling in women’s body hair rebellions. Gend Soc 2011; 25 451–72.
[42] Thompson KJ, Stice E. Thin-ideal internalization: mounting evidence for a new risk factor for body-image disturbance and eating pathology. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2001; 10 181–3.
| Thin-ideal internalization: mounting evidence for a new risk factor for body-image disturbance and eating pathology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
