Substantial increase in yield of Neisseria gonorrhoeae testing 2008–2013 at a Sydney metropolitan sexual health clinic: an observational study
Preethi Rajagopal A , Sian L. Goddard A B and David J. Templeton A B C DA RPA Sexual Health, Sydney Local Health District, 16 Marsden Street, Camperdown , NSW 2050, Australia.
B The Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Wallace Wurth Building, High Street, Kensigton, NSW 2052, Australia.
C Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Jane Foss Russell Building, City Road, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: david.templeton@health.nsw.gov.au
Sexual Health 15(1) 79-82 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH17080
Submitted: 12 April 2017 Accepted: 9 August 2017 Published: 12 October 2017
Abstract
Background: A substantial increase in gonorrhoea notifications in New South Wales has been observed in recent years. Methods: We assessed yield of testing and characteristics of those diagnosed with gonorrhoea from January 2008 to December 2013 at RPA Sexual Health in the inner-west of Sydney. Yield was defined as the proportion of testing occasions which were positive for gonorrhoea. Generalised estimating equations were used to calculate trends in yield over time. Results: During the 6-year study period, 6456 individuals (4308 males, 2124 females, 24 transgender individuals) were tested on 12 799 occasions; this included 2441 gay and bisexual men (GBM) who were tested on 6945 occasions. Over the study period there was a significant increase in testing at genital, anorectal and pharyngeal sites (P-trend <0.001 for all). In total, gonorrhoea was detected on 668 testing occasions among 536 individuals (5.2%). Overall, 254/12765 (2.0%) of genital tests, 251/7326 (3.4%) of anorectal tests and 342/8252 (4.1%) of pharyngeal tests were positive. There was a significant increase in overall gonorrhoea yield from 2.2% in 2008 to 7.1% in 2013 (P-trend <0.001). This temporal increase in gonorrhoea yield was observed in heterosexual males (P < 0.001), heterosexual females (P-trend = 0.008), female sex workers (P-trend = 0.006), HIV-positive GBM and HIV-negative GBM (both P < 0.001) and at all anatomical sites (P-trend <0.001 for all). Conclusions: From 2008 to 2013, we observed a greater than threefold increase in yield of gonorrhoea testing disproportionately affecting GBM, although the increase also occurred in other subpopulations and at all anatomic sites. More frequent and comprehensive testing could potentially reduce the high and increasing community prevalence of gonorrhoea.
Additional keywords: epidemiology, homosexuality, male.
References
[1] Roberts-Witteveen A, Pennington K, Higgins N, Lang C, Lahra M, Waddell R, Kaldor J. Epidemiology of gonorrhoea notifications in Australia, 2007–12. Sex Health 2014; 11 324–31.| Epidemiology of gonorrhoea notifications in Australia, 2007–12.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Ingleton A, Hope K, Najjar Z, Templeton DJ, Gupta L. Characteristics of gonorrhoea cases notified in inner and south-western Sydney, Australia: results of population-based enhanced surveillance. Sex Health 2016; 13 484–8.
[3] Chow EP, Tomnay J, Fehler G, Whiley D, Read TR, Denham I, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Fairley CK. Substantial increases in chlamydia and gonorrhoea positivity unexplained by changes in individual-level sexual behaviours among men who have sex with men in an Australian sexual health service from 2007 to 2013. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42 81–7.
| Substantial increases in chlamydia and gonorrhoea positivity unexplained by changes in individual-level sexual behaviours among men who have sex with men in an Australian sexual health service from 2007 to 2013.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Public health England health protection report, volume 10 number 22 advanced access report. 2016. Available online at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/534601/hpr2216_stis.pdf [verified 12 April 2017].
[5] Hull P, Mao L, Kao S-C, Edwards B, Prestage G, Zablotska I, de Wit J, Holt M. Gay community periodic survey: Sydney 2013. Sydney: National Centre in HIV Social Research, University of New South Wales; 2013. Available online at: http://nchsr.arts.unsw.edu.au/publications/ [verified 12 April 2017].
[6] Australasian Sexual Health Alliance. Australian STI management guidelines for use in primary care. Available online at: http://www.sti.guidelines.org.au/populations-and-situations/pregnant-women [verified 12 April 2017].
[7] Kojima N, Davey DJ, Klausner JD. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection and new sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. AIDS 2016; 30 2251–2.
| Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection and new sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Chow EP, Fehler G, Read TR, Tabrizi SN, Hocking JS, Denham I, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Fairley CK. Gonorrhoea notifications and nucleic acid amplification testing in a very low-prevalence Australian female population. Med J Aust 2015; 202 321–3.
| Gonorrhoea notifications and nucleic acid amplification testing in a very low-prevalence Australian female population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Bolan RK, Beymer MR, Weiss RE, Flynn RP, Leibowitz AA, Klausner JD. Doxycycline prophylaxis to reduce incident syphilis among HIV-infected men who have sex with men who continue to engage in high-risk sex: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42 98–103.
| Doxycycline prophylaxis to reduce incident syphilis among HIV-infected men who have sex with men who continue to engage in high-risk sex: a randomized, controlled pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtlGkt7s%3D&md5=e9210c66862e3cddb9a1de33253011e4CAS |
[10] Templeton DJ, Read P, Varma R, Bourne C. Australian sexually transmissible infection and HIV testing guidelines for asymptomatic men who have sex with men 2014: a review of the evidence. Sex Health 2014; 11 217–29.
| Australian sexually transmissible infection and HIV testing guidelines for asymptomatic men who have sex with men 2014: a review of the evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
