HIV testing rate increased following recommendation of routine screening of acute medical admissions at Royal Darwin Hospital
Laura M. Lallenec A D , Bart J. Currie A B , Rob W. Baird A , Matthew Pitman A and Nathan Ryder C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Royal Darwin Hospital, 105 Rocklands Drive, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia.
B Menzies School of Health Research, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, 105 Rocklands Drive, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia.
C Sexual Health and Blood Borne Virus Unit, Communicable Disease Centre, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, 105 Docklands Drive, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: lauralallenec@yahoo.com.au
Sexual Health 12(5) 433-438 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH14136
Submitted: 17 July 2014 Accepted: 29 April 2015 Published: 20 July 2015
Abstract
Background: To improve HIV detection, Royal Darwin Hospital implemented a guideline in 2012 recommending routine HIV testing for all adult acute medical admissions. This study aimed to determine the uptake, point prevalence and impact on late diagnosis of HIV screening following guideline implementation. Methods: Data on the number of HIV tests and number of acute medical admissions over the 8 months prior and post guideline implementation were extracted from hospital databases. A qualitative survey was conducted to ascertain clinician response to routine screening. Results: Fourteen per cent of admissions were tested post-implementation compared with 5.3% during the implementation period (P < 0.001). HIV prevalence pre-implementation was 1.4% compared with 0.3% following implementation (P < 0.05). The average CD4 count at diagnosis was <200 cells/mm3. Conclusions: There was a significant increase in HIV testing following guideline implementation; however, the overall testing rate remained low. Routine screening did not increase detection of HIV, and HIV continues to be diagnosed late at Royal Darwin Hospital. Methods for improving understanding of the rationale for routine screening and increased promotion of the guidelines are required to increase testing.
Additional keywords: disease prevalence, guideline implementation, late diagnosis.
References
[1] Northern Territory Disease Control Centre NT notifications of diseases by onset date and districts 1 January to 30 March 2013 and 2012. NT CDC Bulletin 2013; 20 31–33.[2] Australian Government. 2011 Census Quickstats. Canberra (Australia): Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian Government; 2013. Available online at: www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/7?opendocument&navpos=220 [verified 31 October 2014].
[3] Australian Government. Seventh National HIV Strategy 2014–2017. Canberra (Australia): Department of Health, Australian Government; 2014. Available online at: www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ohp-bbvs-hiv [verified 31 October 2014].
[4] Ryder N. Newly diagnosed HIV infection in the Northern Territory 2003–2009. The NT CDC Bulletin 2010; 17 27–9.
[5] National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research. HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infection in Australia Annual Surveillance Report 2009. Sydney, NSW: National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, The University of New South Wales. Available online at: http://www.nchecr.unsw.edu.au/NCHECRweb.nsf/page/Annual+Surveillance+Reports [verified 31 October 2014].
[6] Holt J. HIV and travel campaign. The NT Disease Control Bulletin 2010; 17 9
[7] Couros P
[8] Pavlin NL, Parker R, Fairley CK, Gunn JM, Hocking J. Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice. BMC Infect Dis 2008; 8 1–5.
| Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Fisher M, Palfreeman A, Ong E. HIV testing and beyond: can we make a difference? Int J STD AIDS 2011; 22 693–4.
| HIV testing and beyond: can we make a difference?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38%2FnvVehtg%3D%3D&md5=5f1f63b446c7923073943f3af525514bCAS | 22174048PubMed |
[10] Moreno A, Mocroft A, Monforte AD. Medical and societal consequence of late presentation. Antivir Ther 2010; 15 9–15.
| Medical and societal consequence of late presentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. HIV testing: increasing uptake and effectiveness in the European Union 2010. Stokholm: ECDC; 2010, p. 2.
[12] Moyer VA, U.S. Preventative Services Task Force Screening for HIV: US Preventative Services Taskforce recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159 51–60.
| 23698354PubMed |
[13] Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Zakher B, Blazina I, Korthuis PT. Screening for HIV: systematic review to update the US Preventative Services Taskforce recommendations. Evidence synthesis no. 95. AHRQ Publication No. 12-05173-EF-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; November 2012.
[14] Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 493–505.
| Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtVars7jF&md5=ab47d40d31a32b0a9c2316659ed67208CAS | 21767103PubMed |
[15] Palfreeman A, Nyatsanza F, Farn H, McKinnon G, Schober P, McNally P. HIV testing for acute medical admissions: evaluation of a pilot study in Leicester, England. Sex Transm Infect 2013; 89 308–10.
| HIV testing for acute medical admissions: evaluation of a pilot study in Leicester, England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23136079PubMed |
[16] Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janseen RS, Taylor AS, Lyss SB, et al Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents and pregnancy women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006; 60 1–17.
[17] Duffus W, Weis K, Kettinger L, Stephens T, Albrecht H, Gibson JJ. Risk-based HIV testing in South Carolina health care settings failed to identify the majority of infected individuals. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2009; 23 339–45.
| Risk-based HIV testing in South Carolina health care settings failed to identify the majority of infected individuals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19320598PubMed |
[18] Lyons MS, Lindsell CJ, Ruffner AH, Wayne B, Hart KW, Sperling MI, Trott AT, Fichtenbaum CJ. Randomized comparison of universal and targeted HIV screening in the Emergency Department. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013; 64 315–23.
| Randomized comparison of universal and targeted HIV screening in the Emergency Department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23846569PubMed |
[19] Beckwith CG, Flanigan TP, Del Rio C, Simmons E, Wing EJ, Carpenter CJ, Bartlett JG. It is time to implement routine not risk-based HIV testing. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40 1037–40.
| It is time to implement routine not risk-based HIV testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15824997PubMed |
[20] Paltiel AD, Weinstein MC, Kimmel AD, Seage GR, Losina E, Zhange H, Freedberg KA, Walensky RP. Expanded screening for HIV in the United States – An analysis of cost-effectiveness. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 586–95.
| Expanded screening for HIV in the United States – An analysis of cost-effectiveness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFemsLg%3D&md5=6c789aaea392223a2d3897e6aaf475b6CAS | 15703423PubMed |
[21] Delpierre C, Cuzin L, Lert F. Routine testing to reduce late HIV diagnosis in France. BMJ 2007; 334 1354–6.
| Routine testing to reduce late HIV diagnosis in France.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17600025PubMed |
[22] United States Government [www.cdc.gov]. Expanded testing initiative. Atlanta (USA): United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S National Public Health Institute, U.S. Government; 2013. Available online at: http:www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/eti.html [verified 24 September 2013].
[23] National HIV Testing Policy Expert Reference Committee. National HIV testing policy 2011. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2011, p. 11.
[24] Ryder N, Broadfoot J, Currie B. HIV testing guideline for adults admitted under the Division of Medicine bedcard. Northern Territory Government Guidelines. Darwin: Northern Territory Government; 2012.
[25] Australian Government. Australian national notifiable diseases and case definitions. Canberra (Australia): Department of Health, Australian Government; 2014. Available online at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cdna-casedefinitions.htm [verified 31 October 2014].
[26] Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health. Georgia (USA): Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; 2014. Available online at: http://www.openepi.com/Proportion/Proportion.htm [verified 17 March 2014].
[27] Hoover JB, Tao G, Hefflelfinger J. Monitoring HIV testing at visits to emergency departments in the United States: very low rate of HIV testing. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013; 62 90–4.
| Monitoring HIV testing at visits to emergency departments in the United States: very low rate of HIV testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23018376PubMed |
[28] Philips D, Barbour A, Stevenson J, Draper S, Motazed R, Elgalib A. Implementation of a routine HIV testing policy in an acute medical setting in a UK general hospital: a cross-sectional study. Sex Transm Infect 2014; 90 185–7.
[29] Burns F, Edwards SG, Woods J, Haidari G, Calderon Y, Leider J, Morris S, Tobin R, Cartledge J, Brown M. Acceptability and feasibility of universal offer of rapid point of care testing for HIV in an acute admissions unit: results of the RAPID project. PLoS One 2012; 7 e35212
| Acceptability and feasibility of universal offer of rapid point of care testing for HIV in an acute admissions unit: results of the RAPID project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XntVemtr0%3D&md5=0feb2107e0bafa07bc38637a95b91b3dCAS | 22558129PubMed |
[30] Francke AL, Smit MC, De Veer AJE, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8 1–11.
| Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Nakanjako D, Kamya M, Daniel K, Mayanja-Kizza H, Freers J, Whalen C, et al Acceptance of routine testing for HIV among adult patients at the medical emergency unit at a national referral hospital in Kampala, Uganda. AIDS Behav 2007; 11 753–8.
| Acceptance of routine testing for HIV among adult patients at the medical emergency unit at a national referral hospital in Kampala, Uganda.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17096199PubMed |
[32] Sanders GD, Bayoumi AM, Sundaram V, Bilir SP, Neukermans CP, Rydzak CE, et al Cost-effectiveness of screening for HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 570–85.
| Cost-effectiveness of screening for HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFemsL0%3D&md5=2ba4ad44d79eaf8b20db5cfef9ef0f92CAS | 15703422PubMed |
