What do young women think about having a chlamydia test? Views of women who tested positive compared with women who tested negative
Jennifer Walker A B I , Sandra Walker C , Christopher K. Fairley C D , Jade Bilardi C , Marcus Y. Chen C D , Catriona S. Bradshaw C D E , Eve Urban C , Marie Pirotta F , Hudson Birden G , Basil Donovan H , John M. Kaldor H , Jane Gunn F and Jane S. Hocking AA Centre for Women’s Health, Gender and Society, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.
B Centre for Excellence in Rural Sexual Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3630, Australia.
C Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.
D Sexual Health Unit, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.
E Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic. 3800, Australia.
F Primary Care Research Unit, Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.
G University Centre for Rural Health, North Coast, Sydney Institute for Emerging Infectious Diseases & Biosecurity, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
H Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, and Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
I Corresponding author. Email: walker@unimelb.edu.au
Sexual Health 10(1) 39-42 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH12019
Submitted: 17 February 2012 Accepted: 26 June 2012 Published: 19 November 2012
Abstract
Objective: To determine young women’s experience of having a chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) test as part of a chlamydia incidence study, and to determine how women who tested positive during the study experienced having a test compared with the experience of women who always tested negative. Methods: Women in an Australian chlamydia incidence study were tested at 3- to 6-monthly intervals during a 12-month period. At the final stage of the study, the women completed a questionnaire about how they felt about testing positive or how they anticipated they might feel about testing positive if they only tested negative. Questions about future sexual behaviour and testing were included. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 872 out of 1116 (78%) women, including 67 women who tested positive. Many women (75%) felt anxious when having a chlamydia test but women who tested positive were less concerned about their future health (61% v. 81%, P < 0.01), were less concerned about their partner’s reactions (62% v. 79%, P < 0.01) and were more likely to discuss their diagnosis with other people (57% v. 36%, P < 0.01). Conclusions: The participants in the study were pleased to have been tested and supported a screening program. Women who tested positive were less concerned about having a positive result than women who tested negative anticipated they might be. Implications: Clinicians need to be aware that having a chlamydia test can cause anxiety in young women and for a screening program to be successful, this must be addressed.
Additional keywords: attitudes, Australia, screening, young women.
References
[1] Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA). National notifiable diseases surveillance system. Canberra: DoHA; 2009.[2] Hocking J, Temple-Smith M, Low N, Donovan B, Gunn J, Law M, et al. ACCEPt (Australian Chlamydia Control Effectiveness Pilot): design of the pilot evaluation. Australasian Sexual Health Conference; 8 September 2009; Brisbane, Australia.
[3] Wilson J, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public health papers 34. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968.
[4] Dixon-Woods M, Stokes T, Young B, Phelps K, Windridge K, Shukla R. Choosing and using services for sexual health: a qualitative study of women’s views. Sex Transm Infect 2001; 77 335–9.
| Choosing and using services for sexual health: a qualitative study of women’s views.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrmsFOgtw%3D%3D&md5=edd74340da9be4a008d30494fb14193aCAS | 11588278PubMed |
[5] Blake D, Kearney M, Oakes M, Druker S, Bibace R. Improving participation in chlamydia screening programs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003; 157 523–9.
| Improving participation in chlamydia screening programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12796231PubMed |
[6] Heritage J, Jones M. A study of young peoples’ attitudes to opportunistic chlamydia testing in UK general practice. Reprod Health 2008; 5 11–19.
| A study of young peoples’ attitudes to opportunistic chlamydia testing in UK general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19099571PubMed |
[7] France C, Thomas K, Slack R, James N. Psychosocial impacts of chlamydia testing are important. BMJ 2001; 322 1245
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzhsVOktQ%3D%3D&md5=db4f9d266236d7f5d6edaaba16d65103CAS | 11388181PubMed |
[8] Christianson M, Johansson E, Emmelin M, Westman G. “One-night stands’’ – risky trips between lust and trust: qualitative interviews with Chlamydia trachomatis infected youth in north Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2003; 31 44–50.
| “One-night stands’’ – risky trips between lust and trust: qualitative interviews with Chlamydia trachomatis infected youth in north Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12623524PubMed |
[9] Ford C, Jaccard J, Millstein S, Viadro C, Eaton J, Miller W. Young adults’ attitudes, beliefs, and feelings about testing for curable STDs outside of clinical settings. J Adolesc Health 2004; 34 266–9.
| 15040995PubMed |
[10] Henning D, Alice R, Sanci L, Dunning T.. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: barriers for homeless young people. Aust J Adv Nurs 2007; 24 8
| 17518159PubMed |
[11] Mills N, Daker-White G, Graham A, Campbell R. Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened. Fam Pract 2006; 23 550–557.
| Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16790452PubMed |
[12] Pavlin NL, Parker R, Fairley CK, Gunn JM, Hocking J. Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in general practice. BMC Infect Dis 2008; 8 62
| Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18471280PubMed |
[13] Piercy H. The importance of contextualisation in giving a diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection: findings from a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2006; 32 227–30.
| The importance of contextualisation in giving a diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection: findings from a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17032509PubMed |
[14] Duncan B, Hart G, Scoular A, Bigrigg A. Qualitative analysis of psychosocial impact of diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis: implications for screening. BMJ 2001; 322 195–9.
| Qualitative analysis of psychosocial impact of diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis: implications for screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ktF2qsA%3D%3D&md5=12acaf204935f873d7bf4a8a38af333cCAS | 11159612PubMed |
[15] Ford C, Viadro C, Miller W. Testing for chlamydial and gonorrheal infections outside of clinic settings – a summary of the literature. Sex Transm Dis 2004; 31 38–51.
| Testing for chlamydial and gonorrheal infections outside of clinic settings – a summary of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14695957PubMed |
[16] Mulholland E, Van Wersch A. Stigma, sexually transmitted infections and attendance at the GUM Clinic: an exploratory study with implications for the theory of planned behaviour. J Health Psychol 2007; 12 17–31.
| Stigma, sexually transmitted infections and attendance at the GUM Clinic: an exploratory study with implications for the theory of planned behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17158837PubMed |
[17] Kangas I, Andersen B, Olesen F, Møller JK, Østergaard L. Psychosocial impact of Chlamydia trachomatis testing in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56 587–593.
| 16882376PubMed |
[18] Pavlin NL, Gunn JM, Parker R, Fairley CK, Hocking J. Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health 2006; 6 221
| Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16948838PubMed |
[19] Walker J, Fairley CK, Urban E, Chen MY, Bradshaw CS, Walker S, et al Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia. BMC Public Health 2011; 11 156
| Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21385471PubMed |
[20] Australasian College of Sexual Health Physicians (ACSHP). Clinical guidelines for the management of sexually transmissible infections among priority populations. Melbourne: ACSHP; . Available online at: http:www.ashm.org.au [verified 2005].
[21] Walker J, Fairley CK, Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Chen MY, Twin J, et al The difference in determinants of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium in a sample of young Australian women. BMC Infect Dis 2011; 11 35
| The difference in determinants of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium in a sample of young Australian women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21284887PubMed |
[22] Walker J, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Chen MY, Bradshaw CS, Twin J, et al Chlamydia trachomatis incidence and re-infection among young women – behavioral and microbiological characteristics. PLoS ONE 2012; 7 e37778
| Chlamydia trachomatis incidence and re-infection among young women – behavioral and microbiological characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XotF2htbg%3D&md5=4385cfdb35c3d41b4cf5d9441b985c5dCAS | 22662220PubMed |
[23] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Census 2006. Canberra: ABS; 2006.
