Condom use in the context of sex research: a commentary

References

[1]  Philpott A, Knerr W, Maher D. Promoting protection and pleasure: amplifying the effectiveness of barriers against sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy. Lancet 2006; 368 2028–31.
| Promoting protection and pleasure: amplifying the effectiveness of barriers against sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Dixon-Mueller R. The sexuality connection in reproductive health. Stud Fam Plann 1993; 24 269–82.
| The sexuality connection in reproductive health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7is1ymsQ%3D%3D&md5=139df6c0c9d6a7961778af85ba693baeCAS |

[3]  Higgins JA, Hirsch JS. The pleasure deficit: revisiting the ‘sexuality connection’ in reproductive health. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2007; 39 240–7.
| The pleasure deficit: revisiting the ‘sexuality connection’ in reproductive health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Shernoff M. Without condoms: unprotected sex, gay men, and barebacking . New York: Routledge; 2005.

[5]  Kelly JA, Kalichman SC. Increased attention to human sexuality can improve HIV-AIDS prevention efforts: key research issues and directions. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995; 63 907–18.
| Increased attention to human sexuality can improve HIV-AIDS prevention efforts: key research issues and directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK287hs1Gmuw%3D%3D&md5=2ae0f84d0a11c6a5a5aba822c36b98faCAS |

[6]  Amaro H. Love, sex, and power: considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. Am Psychol 1995; 50 437–47.
| Love, sex, and power: considering women’s realities in HIV prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzitFGjtg%3D%3D&md5=9119ba48f06844f8004f965373f9eb60CAS |

[7]  Wingood G, DiClemente R. Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Educ Behav 2000; 27 539–65.
| Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvlt1Ontw%3D%3D&md5=95ab4bbd65f8c4be0f244fb56405b409CAS |

[8]  Crosby R, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Sionean C, Cobb BK, Harrington K, et al Correct condom application among African-American adolescent females: the relationship to perceived self-efficacy and the association to confirmed STDs. J Adolesc Health 2001; 29 194–9.
| Correct condom application among African-American adolescent females: the relationship to perceived self-efficacy and the association to confirmed STDs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvotFSgsg%3D%3D&md5=d5e4615cd6f20398c55822116fc1ed83CAS |

[9]  Sanders SA, Graham CA, Yarber WL, Crosby RA. Condom use errors and problems among young women who put condoms on their male partners. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2003; 58 95–8.

[10]  Choi KH, Rickman R, Catania JA. What heterosexual adults believe about condoms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 406–7.
| What heterosexual adults believe about condoms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2czgtFeksA%3D%3D&md5=3d03697f15b676c459ef69311196c4e3CAS |

[11]  Flood M. Lust, trust and latex: why young heterosexual men do not use condoms. Cult Health Sex 2003; 5 353–69.
| Lust, trust and latex: why young heterosexual men do not use condoms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Khan SI, Hudson-Rodd N, Saggers S, Bhuiyan MI, Bhuiya A. Safer sex or pleasurable sex? Rethinking condom use in the AIDS era. Sex Health 2004; 1 217–25.
| Safer sex or pleasurable sex? Rethinking condom use in the AIDS era.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Norton TR, Bogart LM, Cecil H, Pinkerton SD. Primacy of affect over cognition in determining adult men’s condom use behavior: a review. J Appl Soc Psychol 2005; 35 2493–534.
| Primacy of affect over cognition in determining adult men’s condom use behavior: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Men and AIDS – a gendered approach. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2000.

[15]  Randolph ME, Pinkerton SD, Bogart LM, Cecil H, Abramson PR. Sexual pleasure and condom use. Arch Sex Behav 2007; 36 844–8.
| Sexual pleasure and condom use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Harper GW, Hosek SG, Contreras R, Doll M. Psychosocial factors impacting adolescent condom use: a review and theoretical integration. J HIV/AIDS Prev Educ Child Adol 2003; 5 33–69.
| Psychosocial factors impacting adolescent condom use: a review and theoretical integration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Morrison-Beedy D, Carey MP, Feng C, Tu XM. Predicting sexual risk behaviours among adolescent and young women using a prospective diary method. Res Nurs Health 2008; 31 329–40.
| Predicting sexual risk behaviours among adolescent and young women using a prospective diary method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Bogart LM, Cecil H, Wagstaff DA, Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR. Is it “sex”?: college students’ interpretations of sexual behavior terminology. J Sex Res 2000; 37 108–16.
| Is it “sex”?: college students’ interpretations of sexual behavior terminology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Gute G, Eshbaugh EM, Wiersma J. Sex for you, but not for me: discontinuity in undergraduate emerging adults’ definitions of ‘having sex’. J Sex Res 2008; 45 329–37.
| Sex for you, but not for me: discontinuity in undergraduate emerging adults’ definitions of ‘having sex’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Pitts M, Rahman Q. Which behaviors constitute “having sex” among university students in the UK? Arch Sex Behav 2001; 30 169–76.
| Which behaviors constitute “having sex” among university students in the UK?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvntlOjsA%3D%3D&md5=7efbbf1abeb0d0594b956b4ed78c8416CAS |

[21]  Sanders SA, Reinisch JM. Would you say you ‘had sex’ if...? JAMA 1999; 281 275–7.
| Would you say you ‘had sex’ if...?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7hsFSnsQ%3D%3D&md5=e32c1458ebba554289ede3a0e262300fCAS |

[22]  Sanders SA, Hill BJ, Yarber WL, Graham CA, Crosby RA, Milhausen RR. Misclassification bias: diversity in conceptualisations about having ‘had sex’. Sex Health 2010; 7 31–4.
| Misclassification bias: diversity in conceptualisations about having ‘had sex’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, & Co; 1966.

[24]  Kaplan HS. The new sex therapy. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel; 1974.

[25]  Graham CA. Review of the DSM diagnostic criteria for female sexual arousal disorder. Arch Sex Behav 2010; 39 240–55.
| Review of the DSM diagnostic criteria for female sexual arousal disorder.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Tiefer L. The medicalization of sexuality: conceptual, normative, and professional issues. Annu Rev Sex Res 1996; 7 252–82.

[27]  Brotto LA, Heiman JR, Tolman DL. Narratives of desire in mid-age women with and without arousal difficulties. J Sex Res 2009; 46 387–98.
| Narratives of desire in mid-age women with and without arousal difficulties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  Graham CA, Sanders SA, Milhausen R, McBride K. Turning on and turning off: a focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav 2004; 33 527–38.
| Turning on and turning off: a focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  McCabe MP, Goldhammer DL. Demographic and psychological factors related to sexual desire among heterosexual women in a relationship. J Sex Res Published online ahead of print.
| Demographic and psychological factors related to sexual desire among heterosexual women in a relationship.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  McCall K, Meston C. Cues resulting in desire for sexual activity in women. J Sex Med 2006; 3 838–52.
| Cues resulting in desire for sexual activity in women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31]  Janssen E, McBride KR, Yarber W, Hill BJ, Butler SM. Factors that influence sexual arousal in men: A focus group study. Arch Sex Behav 2008; 37 252–65.
| Factors that influence sexual arousal in men: A focus group study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Bancroft J. Human sexuality and its problems (3rd edition). Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009.

[33]  Chevret-Méasson M, Lavallee E, Troy S, Arnould B, Oudin S, Cuzin B. Improvement in quality of sexual life in female partners of men with erectile dysfunction treated with sildenafil citrate: findings of the index of sexual life (ISL) in a couple study. J Sex Med 2009; 6 761–9.
| Improvement in quality of sexual life in female partners of men with erectile dysfunction treated with sildenafil citrate: findings of the index of sexual life (ISL) in a couple study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Fisher WA, Rosen RC, Eardley E, Sand M, Goldstein I. Sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: the Female Experience of Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (FEMALES) study. J Sex Med 2005; 2 675–84.
| Sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: the Female Experience of Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (FEMALES) study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[35]  Albarracín D, Gillette J, Earl A, Glasman LR, Durantini MR, Ho MH. A test of major assumptions about behavior change: a comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychol Bull 2005; 131 856–97.
| A test of major assumptions about behavior change: a comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Burton J, Darbes LA, Operario D. Couples-focused behavioral interventions for prevention of HIV: Systematic review of the state of evidence. AIDS Behav 2010; 14 1–10.
| Couples-focused behavioral interventions for prevention of HIV: Systematic review of the state of evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Karney BR, Hops H, Redding CA, Reis HT, Rothman AJ, Simpson JA. A framework for incorporating dyads in models of HIV-prevention. AIDS Behav 2010; 14 189–203.
| A framework for incorporating dyads in models of HIV-prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Allen S, Meinzen-Derr J, Kautzman M, Zulu I, Trask S, Fideli U, et al Sexual behavior of HIV discordant couples after HIV counseling and testing. AIDS 2003; 17 733–40.
| Sexual behavior of HIV discordant couples after HIV counseling and testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[39]  Mustanski B, Newcomb ME, Clerkin EM. Relationship characteristics and sexual risk-taking in young men who have sex with men. Health Psychol 2011; 30 597–605.
| Relationship characteristics and sexual risk-taking in young men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[40]  Edwards GL, Barber B. Women may underestimate their partners’ desires to use condoms: possible implications for behaviour. J Sex Res 2009; 47 59–65.
| Women may underestimate their partners’ desires to use condoms: possible implications for behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[41]  Sanders SA, Graham CA, Yarber WL, Crosby RA. Condom use errors and problems among young women who put condoms on their male partners. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2003; 58 95–8.

[42]  Yarber WL, Crosby RA, Graham CA, Sanders SA, Hartzell R, Butler S. ‘Do you know what you are doing?’ College students’ experiences with condoms. Am J Health Educ 2007; 38 260–9.

[43]  Bancroft J. Individual differences in sexual risk taking: A biopsychological theoretical approach. In Bancroft J, editor. pp. 177–209. The role of theory in sex research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2000.

[44]  Trobst KK, Herbst JH, Masters HL, Costa PT. Personality pathways to unsafe sex: personality, condom use, and HIV risk behaviors. J Res Pers 2002; 36 117–33.
| Personality pathways to unsafe sex: personality, condom use, and HIV risk behaviors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[45]  Weis DL. The use of theory in sexuality research. J Sex Res 1998; 35 1–9.
| The use of theory in sexuality research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[46]  Bancroft J, Janssen E. The dual control model of male sexual response: a theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2000; 24 571–9.
| The dual control model of male sexual response: a theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvit1ahsA%3D%3D&md5=143dc1f751f25d5bbc3ef369c93ff8fdCAS |

[47]  Bancroft J, Graham CA, Janssen E, Sanders SA. The dual control model: current status and future directions. J Sex Res 2009; 46 121–42.
| The dual control model: current status and future directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[48]  Bancroft J, Janssen E, Strong D, Carnes L, Long JS. Sexual risk taking in gay men: the relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. Arch Sex Behav 2003; 32 555–72.
| Sexual risk taking in gay men: the relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[49]  Bancroft J, Janssen E, Carnes L, Strong DA, Goodrich D, Long JS. Sexual activity and risk taking in young heterosexual men: the relevance of personality factors. J Sex Res 2004; 41 181–92.
| Sexual activity and risk taking in young heterosexual men: the relevance of personality factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[50]  Turchik JA, Garske JP. Measurement of sexual risk taking among college students. Arch Sex Behav 2009; 38 936–48.
| Measurement of sexual risk taking among college students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[51]  Carpenter DL, Janssen E, Graham CA, Vorst H, Wicherts J. Women’s scores on the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES): gender similarities and differences. J Sex Res 2008; 45 36–48.
| Women’s scores on the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES): gender similarities and differences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[52]  Janssen E, Vorst H, Finn P, Bancroft J. The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. J Sex Res 2002; 39 114–26.
| The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[53]  Graham CA, Sanders SA, Milhausen RR, McBride KR. Predicting sexual risk-taking and sexual problems in women: the relevance of sexual inhibition and sexual excitation. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research; 6–9 July, 2005; Ottawa, Canada.

[54]  Graham CA, Sanders SA, Milhausen RR. Sexual excitation and sexual inhibition inventory for women. Arch Sex Behav 2006; 35 397–409.
| Sexual excitation and sexual inhibition inventory for women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[55]  Milhausen RR, Sanders SA, Graham CA, Yarber WL, Maitland SD. Sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women and men (SESII-W/M). Arch Sex Behav 2010; 39 1091–104.
| Sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women and men (SESII-W/M).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[56]  Gagnon J. Theorizing risky sex. In Bancroft J, editor. pp. 149–176. The role of theory in sex research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2000.

[57]  Satcher D. Call to action to promote sexual health and responsible sexual behavior. Rockville, MD: Office of the Surgeon General; 2001. Available online at: www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/sexualhealth [verified October 2011].

[58]  Gold RS. AIDS education for gay men: towards a more cognitive approach. AIDS Care 2000; 12 267–72.
| AIDS education for gay men: towards a more cognitive approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhslKgsQ%3D%3D&md5=ee49296f02288674ddff9726f452b212CAS |

[59]  Higgins JA, Hirsch JS. Pleasure, power, and inequality: incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use. Am J Public Health 2008; 98 1803–13.
| Pleasure, power, and inequality: incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[60]  Helweg-Larsen M, Collins BE. Multidimensional condom attitudes scale. Health Psychol 1994; 13 224–37.
| Multidimensional condom attitudes scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2czjtlaktg%3D%3D&md5=cda5943de5cec9915d01ae55563bf7f2CAS |

[61]  Salina DD, Razzano L, Lesondak L. Influence of health beliefs, attitudes and concern about HIV/AIDS on condom use in college women. J Prev Interv Community 2000; 19 41–53.
| Influence of health beliefs, attitudes and concern about HIV/AIDS on condom use in college women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[62]  Crosby R, Milhausen R, Yarber WL, Sanders SA, Graham CA. Condom “turn offs” among adults: an exploratory study. Int J STD AIDS 2008; 19 590–4.
| Condom “turn offs” among adults: an exploratory study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[63]  Graham CA, Crosby R, Yarber WL, Sanders SA, McBride K, Milhausen RR, et al Erection loss in association with condom use among young men attending a public STI clinic: potential correlates and implications for risk behavior. Sex Health 2006; 3 255–60.
| Erection loss in association with condom use among young men attending a public STI clinic: potential correlates and implications for risk behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[64]  Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Why do condoms break or slip off in use? An exploratory study. Int J STD AIDS 1995; 6 11–8.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ksVKmug%3D%3D&md5=1f7a5549cfeec8e2d95ded62af65f3deCAS |

[65]  Richters J, Hendry O, Kippax S. When safe sex isn’t safe. Cult Health Sex 2003; 5 37–52.
| When safe sex isn’t safe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[66]  Hensel DJ, Stupiansky NW, Herbenick D, Dodge B, Reece M. When condom use is not condom use: an event-level analysis of condom use behaviors during vaginal intercourse. J Sex Med 2011; 8 28–34.
| When condom use is not condom use: an event-level analysis of condom use behaviors during vaginal intercourse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[67]  Rosen RC, Catania JA, Ehrhardt AA, Burnett AL, Lue TF, McKenna K, et al The Bolger Conference on PDE-5 inhibition and HIV risk: implications for health policy and prevention. J Sex Med 2006; 3 960–75.
| The Bolger Conference on PDE-5 inhibition and HIV risk: implications for health policy and prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtlWmsLvM&md5=1627ed5f9409bc6ff8c3ace3fe153ff5CAS |

[68]  Sanders SA, Milhausen RR, Crosby RA, Graham CA, Yarber WL. Do phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors protect against condom-associated erection loss and condom slippage? J Sex Med 2009; 6 1451–6.
| Do phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors protect against condom-associated erection loss and condom slippage?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmtFaitLg%3D&md5=deb99f3086e3789e69e9916d195d6c83CAS |

[69]  Korkes F, Costa-Matos A, Gasperini R, Reginato PV, Perez MDC. Recreational use of PDE5 inhibitors by young healthy men: recognizing this issue among medical students. J Sex Med 2008; 5 2414–8.

[70]  Higgins JA, Tanner AE, Janssen E. Arousal loss related to safer sex and risk of pregnancy: implications for women’s and men’s sexual health. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2009; 41 150–7.
| Arousal loss related to safer sex and risk of pregnancy: implications for women’s and men’s sexual health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[71]  Graham CA, Crosby RA, Yarber WL, Sanders SA. Incomplete use of condoms: the importance of sexual arousal. AIDS Behav 2011; 15 1328–31.
| Incomplete use of condoms: the importance of sexual arousal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[72]  Knerr W, Philpott A. Strange bedfellows: bridging the worlds of academia, public health and the sex industry to improve sexual health outcomes. Health Res Policy Syst 2011; 9 S1–13.
| Strange bedfellows: bridging the worlds of academia, public health and the sex industry to improve sexual health outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[73]  Ingham R. ‘We didn’t cover that at school’: education against pleasure or education for pleasure? Sex Educ 2005; 5 375–88.
| ‘We didn’t cover that at school’: education against pleasure or education for pleasure?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[74]  Marston C, King E. Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review. Lancet 2006; 368 1581–6.
| Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |