Is Accelerated Partner Therapy partner notification for sexually transmissible infections acceptable and feasible in general practice?
Thomas Shackleton A B , Lorna Sutcliffe A B and Claudia Estcourt A B C D EA Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Barts, London ECIA 7BE, UK.
B London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London ECIA 7BE, UK.
C Infection & Immunity, Barts, London ECIA 7BE, UK.
D London NHS Trust, London ECIA 7BE, UK.
E Corresponding author. Email: c.s.estcourt@qmul.ac.uk
Sexual Health 8(1) 17-22 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH10031
Submitted: 11 March 2010 Accepted: 23 July 2010 Published: 24 January 2011
Abstract
Background: Partner notification in primary care is problematic and of limited effectiveness despite enthusiasm from primary care providers to engage with sexually transmissible infection (STI) management. Innovative partner notification strategies must be relevant to the primary care context. The aim of the present study was to explore the opinions of general practitioners (GP) and practice nurses on the acceptability and feasibility of a new form of partner notification developed in the specialist setting known as Accelerated Partner Therapy (APT), for sex partners of those diagnosed with a bacterial STI in general practice. APT is defined as partner notification strategies that reduce time for sex partners to be treated, and include partner assessment by appropriately qualified health care professionals and here involve telephone and community pharmacy assessment. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of GP and practice nurses in East London, UK. Results: All participants appreciated the importance of partner notification in STI management and felt that APT would improve their practice. They supported prioritising antibiotic provision for the sex partners with provision for future comprehensive STI screening. Although both models were acceptable and feasible, the majority preferred the sexual health clinic telephone assessment over the pharmacy model. Conclusions: GP and practice nurses welcome new strategies for partner notification and believe APT could provide rapid and convenient treatment of sex partners in general practice. This supports further evaluation of APT models as a partner notification strategy in primary care.
Additional keywords: partner notification, primary care.
Acknowledgements
We thank the GPs and practice nurses who gave their time and opinions in this study and Ms K Lucas for help with manuscript preparation. TS was funded by Tower Hamlets Primary Care Trust/ Barts and The London NHS Trust Salaried GP Scheme.
[1]
[2]
[3] CDC Recommendations for partner services programs for HIV infection, syphilis, gonorrhoea, and chlamydial infection. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008; 57 1–63.
| PubMed | [verified March 2010].
[7] Stokes T, Schober P. A survey of contact tracing practice for sexually transmitted diseases in GUM clinics in England and Wales. Int J STD AIDS 1999; 10 17–21.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | [verified March 2010].
[16]
[17]
[18] Shivasankar S, Challenor R, Ekanayaka R. Patient-delivered partner therapy in the UK: what do patients think? Int J STD AIDS 2008; 19 433–6.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified March 2010].