Confidentiality and access to sexual health services
Nathan Ryder A B C and Anna M. McNulty A BA Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, GPO BOX 1614, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia.
B School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: nathan.ryder@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au
Sexual Health 6(2) 153-155 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH08078
Submitted: 23 October 2008 Accepted: 9 March 2009 Published: 18 May 2009
Abstract
Background: Confidentiality concerns are often described as barriers to seeking sexual health care. There has been little research describing the relative importance of confidentiality to clients of sexual health clinics, and whether members of high-risk groups have greater concerns. This study aimed to determine the importance of confidentiality and anonymity to clients of a public sexual health clinic, and determine associations with gender and sexuality. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was offered to consecutive new English-speaking clients in October and November 2007. Participants were asked to describe the reasons for presenting, likelihood of disclosing identifying information, and concern should specific people and agencies become aware of their attendance. Results: Of 350 eligible clients, 270 (77%) participated in the survey. Expert care was included in the top three reasons for choosing a sexual health clinic rather than a general practitioner by over half of participants, while confidentiality and cost were each included in the top three reasons by one-third of respondents respectively. Over 90% of clients reported they were likely to give accurate identifying information to the clinic. Participants were comfortable with disclosure of information to other health-care workers but became increasingly unwilling for information to be shared with services not directly involved in their care. Overall there were few associations with gender or sexuality. Conclusion: Clients choose to attend our clinic for a variety of reasons, with confidentiality and anonymity being of lesser importance than competence and cost. Confidentiality is important to the majority of clients, whereas few desire anonymity. Most clients would accept information being shared with other health services, suggesting that confidentiality may not be a barrier to the use of electronic health records in sexual health clinics.
Additional keywords: health services accessibility, reproductive health services.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Lisa An, a medical student who was involved in the project, and Sydney Sexual Health Centre administration staff for ensuring all eligible clients received the questionnaire.
[1] Spillane H, McNulty A, Wand H, Tribe K, Donovan B. Who declines to give a name at a sexual health service? Sex Transm Infect 2007; 83 160–2.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[2] Thomas N, Murray E, Rogstad KE. Confidentiality is essential if young people are to access sexual health services. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 525–9.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
[3] Schwarcz S, Stockman J, Delgado V, Scheer S. Does name-based HIV reporting deter high-risk persons from HIV testing? Results from San Francisco. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004; 35 93–6.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[4]
[5] Hambly S, Luzzi G. Sexual health services – a patient preference survey. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 372–4.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |