Performance of serological tests for syphilis in sexually transmitted diseases clinics in Guangxi Autonomous Region, China: implications for syphilis surveillance and control
Yue-Ping Yin A , Wan-Hui Wei A , Hong-Chun Wang A , Bang-Yong Zhu B , Yan-Hua Yu A , Xiang-Sheng Chen A E , Rosanna W. Peeling C and Myron S. Cohen DA China CDC National Center for STD Control, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Institute of Dermatology, 12 Jiangwangmiao Street, Nanjing 210042, China.
B Guangxi Institute of Dermatology, 3 Chenxi Road, Nanning 530003, China.
C Sexually Transmitted Diseases Diagnostics Initiative, World Health Organization/Tropical Disease Research (TDR), 20, Avenue Appia, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
D Center for Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
E Corresponding author. Email:chenxs@ncstdlc.org
Sexual Health 6(1) 5-9 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH08027
Submitted: 6 April 2008 Accepted: 20 October 2008 Published: 23 February 2009
Abstract
Background: China is experiencing a growing syphilis epidemic. Individuals are currently screened and cases are confirmed using traditional serological testing methods. Methods: A total of 11 558 serum specimens from patients at 14 sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinics at provincial, prefecture and county levels in Guangxi Autonomous Region were tested at local clinics using the toluidine red unheated serum test (TRUST) and the SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 Treponema Pallidum (SD-TP) test and then transported to the National STD Reference Laboratory for TRUST and confirmatory Treponema pallidum particle assay (TPPA) testing. Results: In local clinics, 13.2% of specimens were TRUST positive and 12.8% were TRUST and SD-TP positive. At the Reference Laboratory, 15.4% of specimens were TRUST positive and 11.8% were TRUST and TPPA positive. Local clinics showed a significantly higher prevalence of active syphilis compared with results from the Reference Laboratory (12.8 v. 11.8%, χ2 = 4.59, P = 0.03). The local TRUST tests had consistent results with Reference Laboratory tests qualitatively among 96.2% of the specimens and quantitatively among 95.5% of the specimens. The algorithm of TRUST screening and then SD-TP confirmation among positive TRUST specimens at local STD clinics had 96.6% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity in diagnosing active syphilis compared with the ‘gold standard’ based on TRUST and TPPA positivity at the Reference Laboratory (positive predictive value 95.1% and negative predictive value 99.5%). Conclusion: The TRUST screening and SD-TP confirmation in combination can be used at local STD clinics for the efficient diagnosis of serologically active syphilis. However, continuing capacity building and quality assurance remain critical in ensuring the quality of syphilis diagnosis at local clinics.
Additional keywords: sensitivity, specificity, TPPA, TRUST.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the staff of the collaborating STD clinics in Nanning, Yulin, Guigang, Liuzhou, Liujiang, Qinzhou and Baihai where this study took place, whose collaboration was very much appreciated. The authors also thank all participants of this study for their wonderful cooperation. This study was funded by the Family Health International Regional Office in Bangkok (contract Financial Cost Objective (FCO) no. 84402) and The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)/The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) World Bank/WHO Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (contract ID OD/AP-06–00102). Special thanks to the Jiangsu Province’s Key Medical Center of Dermatology and Venearology in Nanjing, the University of North Carolina Center for AIDS Research at Chapel Hill, and the National Institutes of Health Fogarty/Ellison Fellowship for global health research. We also thank Rachel V. Perline, a student from the Tulane University School of Medicine/School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine and the NIH Fogarty International Center Research Scholar, for English editing.
[1]
[2]
[3] Chen ZQ, Zhang GC, Zhang GC, Gong XD, Lin C, Gao X, et al. Syphilis in China: results of a national surveillance programme. Lancet 2007; 369 132–8.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[4] Lin CC, Gao X, Chen XS, Chen Q, Cohen MS. China’s syphilis epidemic: a systematic review of seroprevalence. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33 726–36.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[5] Larsen S, Steiner B, Rudolph A. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995; 8 1–21.
| CAS | PubMed |
[6] Herring AJ, Ballard RC, Pope V, Adegbola RA, Changalucha J, Fitzgerald DW, et al. A multi-centre evaluation of nine rapid, point-of-care syphilis tests using archived sera. Sex Transm Infect 2006; 82 v7–12.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[7] Chen XS, Yin YP, Tucker JD, Gao X, Cheng F, Wang TF, et al. Rethinking HIV in China: detection of acute and established HIV infection in STI clinics. J Infect Dis 2007; 196 1654–61.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[8]
[9] West B, Walraven G, Morison L, Brouwers J, Bailey R. Performance of the rapid plasma regain and the rapid syphilis screening tests in the diagnosis of syphilis in field conditions in rural Africa. Sex Transm Infect 2002; 78 282–5.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
[10] Mabey D, Peeling RW, Ballard R, Benzaken AS, Galban E, Changalucha J, et al. Prospective, multicentre clinic-based evaluation of four rapid diagnostic tests for syphilis. Sex Transm Infect 2006; 82 v13–16.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |