Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Male sexuality in Vietnam: the case of male-to-male sex

Bao Ngoc Vu A F , Philippe Girault B , Binh Van Do C , Donn Colby D and Lien Thi Bich Tran E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Family Health International, Vietnam Office, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi, Vietnam.

B Family Health International, Asia-Pacific Regional Office, Lumpini, Phatumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

C Centre for Social Work and Community Development Research and Consultancy (SDRC), Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

D Vietnam–CDC – Harvard Medical School AIDS Partnership, Tropical Disease Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

E Social Sciences and Humanities School, Ho Chi Minh City National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

F Corresponding author. Email: bao@fhi.org.vn

Sexual Health 5(1) 83-88 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07064
Submitted: 27 August 2007  Accepted: 29 January 2008   Published: 22 February 2008

Abstract

Background: To implement effective behaviour change interventions for men who have sex with men, qualitative information was collected about the contexts and meanings of sex and relationships between men in Ho Chi Minh City. Methods: Individual interviews and focus groups were conducted with 74 men aged 18 years or older who had had sex with another man in the previous 12 months. Results: Findings reveal that sex between men exists and is associated with two common descriptors in Vietnam: bong lo for those who are feminised in public and bong kin for those who are not, and are often married. In sexual relationships, for both groups of men, there is a trade off between sexual pleasure and risk. Condoms may not be used, particularly when having sex with a partner who was considered to be good looking or perceived as ‘clean’. Conclusions: The study highlights the need for HIV prevention programs which address issues of sexual meaning in male-to-male sexual relationships.

Additional keywords: HIV prevention, men who have sex with men.


Acknowledgements

The research described in this paper was partly supported by United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, and was implemented by Family Health International, Cooperative Agreement No. 486-A-00-06-00009-00. The views expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. We would like to thank the HCMC AIDS Committee, especially Dr Le Truong Giang, Dr Tran Thinh and Mr Le Cao Dung, and the Binh Thanh District Health Center, especially Dr Pham Bao Lam and staff at the Blue Sky Men’s Health Club, for their support to the implementation of the project. We also thank the peer outreach workers, the interviewers and the respondents who participated in the study. We would like to acknowledge the critical comments and suggestions provided by Ms Donna Flanagan, Dr Stephen J. Mills, Dr Philippe Guest, Ms Tenley Mogk and Ms Jennifer Nugent. The authors are grateful to Dr Paul Boyce and Professor Peter Aggleton for their comments on earlier drafts of the paper.


References


[1] Ministry of Health. Estimates and Projections of HIV/AIDS 2005–2010. Hanoi: Medical Publishing House; 2005.

[2] The Alan Guttmacher Institute. In Their Own Right, Addressing the Sexual and Reproductive Health needs of Men. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute; 2003.

[3] Wilson D,  Cawthorne P. ‘Face up to the truth’: helping gay men in Vietnam protect themselves from AIDS. Int J STD AIDS 1999; 10 63–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[4] Colby D. HIV knowledge and risk behaviours among men who have sex with men in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 32 80–5.
PubMed |

[5] Colby D,  Cao NH,  Doussantousse S. Men who have sex with men and HIV in Vietnam: a review. AIDS Educ Prev 2004; 16 45–54.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[6] CARE International. The risk of AIDS in Vietnam: an audience analysis of urban men and sex workers, with guidelines for prevention. Hanoi; 1993.

[7] St-Pierre M . Evaluation of SC UK HIV/AIDS prevention program for men who have sex with men (MSM); Research report. Ho Chi Minh City: SC UK; 1997.

[8] Hong KT . Study on sexuality in Vietnam: the known and unknown issues. Hanoi: Population Council; 1998.

[9] Bao VN , Long L , Taylor Y . Suffered lives: behavioral and social assessment of risk practices for HIV/AIDS prevention in Can Tho. Hanoi: Population Council; 1999.

[10] Parker R. Sexuality, culture and power in HIV/AIDS research. Annu Rev Anthropol 2001; 30 163–79.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11] Boyce P,  Huang Soo Lee M,  Jenkins C,  Mohamed S,  Overs C,  Paiva V, et al. Putting sexuality (back) into HIV/AIDS: issues, theory and practice. Global Public Health 2007; 2 1–34.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12] Kelly PF . What is known about gender, the constructs of sexuality and dictates of behaviour in Vietnam as Confucian and socialist society and their impact on the risk of HIV/AIDS epidemic. In: E Micollier (ed.). Sexual Cultures in East Asia. The social construction of sexuality and sexual risk in a time of AIDS. London: RoutledgeCurzon; 2004. pp. 98–126.

[13] Jackson PA , Sullivan G . A panoply of roles: sexual and gender diversity in contemporary Thailand. In: PA Jackson, G Sullivan (eds). Male and female homosexualities in contemporary Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books; 2000. pp. 1–27.

[14] Storer G . Rehearsing gender and sexuality in modern Thailand: masculinity and male-male sex behaviours. In: PA Jackson, G Sullivan (eds). Male and female homosexualities in contemporary Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books; 2000. pp. 137–55.

[15] Sullivan G . Variations on a Common Theme? Gay and Lesbian Identity and Community in Asia? In: PA Jackson, G. Sullivan (eds). Gay and Lesbian Asia: Culture, Identity, Community. Binghamton: Harrington Park Press; 2001. pp. 253–69.