Chaperones – real or virtual?
Karen E. Rogstad
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK. Email: karen.rogstad@sth.nhs.uk
Sexual Health 4(3) 208-208 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07059
Submitted: 31 July 2007 Accepted: 31 July 2007 Published: 23 August 2007
References
[1] Rogstad K. Chaperones: protecting the patient or protecting the doctor? Sex Health 2007; 4 85–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[2] Baber JA, Davies SC, Dayan LS. An extra pair of eyes: do patients want a chaperone when having an anogenital examination? Sex Health 2007; 4 89–93.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[3] Newton DC, Fairley CK, Teague R, Donovan B, Bowden FJ, Bilardi J, et al. Australian sexual health practitioners’ use of chaperones for genital examinations: a survey of attitudes and practice. Sex Health 2007; 4 95–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[4] Davies SC, Baber JA, Dayan JS. A hood for a hawk: when to use chaperones in sexual health clinics. Sex Health 2007; 4 205–206.
[5] Newton DC, Chen MY, Cummings R, Fairley CK. Recommendations for chaperoning in sexual health settings. Sex Health 2007; 4 207.
[6] McNulty A, Knight V. Chaperones – are there other options? Sex Health 2007; 4 206.
[7] Jones RS, Barton SE, McClean KA, Mandalia S, Pickett J, Cohen CE. Is it time for the virtual chaperone in genitourinary medicine clinics? Int J STD AIDS 2007; 18 458–60.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
