Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
REVIEW

Teenagers who plan parenthood

Julie A. Quinlivan
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Women’s Hospital, 132 Grattan Streeet, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia. Email: julieq@unimelb.edu.au

Sexual Health 1(4) 201-208 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH04011
Submitted: 24 March 2004  Accepted: 9 September 2004   Published: 21 December 2004

Abstract

It is clear that a variable number of teenage mothers have, to some extent, planned parenthood. From an evolutionary perspective, it could be argued that teenage childbearing may in fact be a positive adaptive mechanism for humans raised in a hostile environment. Life history theory suggests that in risky and uncertain environments the optimal reproductive strategy is to reproduce early in order to maximise the probability of leaving any descendents at all. If some teenagers are planning or hoping for pregnancy, it is possible that some positive behavioural changes may be observed. This has proven to be the case with many teenagers altering their risk taking behaviours in the anticipation and expectation of pregnancy. There is now substantial evidence that teenagers who become pregnant were at higher risk than the general population for using cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. However, once pregnant, rates of consumption are usually lower compared with their non-pregnant peers or even their own personal pre-pregnancy rates of consumption. Therefore, for some teenagers, the conscious or unconscious prospect of pregnancy represents a potential space in which to rethink behaviours that may be harmful to themselves as a future mother, and also to their child.

Given that teenage motherhood is not going to simply vanish, it is important to remember to focus research and services on validated interventions that may assist teenage mothers fulfill their ambitions of parenthood and simultaneously provide the best outcomes for their offspring. Evidence-based interventions focus on sustained home visitation by nurses, with limited evidence supporting the use of volunteers. In contrast, evidence suggests that home visitation by paraprofessionals may not be effective. Other strategies that may be helpful include the use of multidisciplinary teenage pregnancy clinics that have been noted to be associated with improved pregnancy outcomes. The role of new mothers’ groups, other community based group activities, peer support workers and intensive educational interventions to encourage return to schooling may be useful but have not been subjected to randomised evaluation. Such evaluation needs to occur.

Additional keywords: teenage pregnancy, interventions, adolescent pregnancy, infant, outcome.


References


[1] Social Exclusion Unit Teenage Pregnancy. Presented to the Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty June 1999. London: British Government Printing Office; 1999 

[2] Ventura SJ,  Abma JC,  Mosher WD,  Henshaw S. Revised pregnancy rates 1990–1997, and new rates for 1998–99: United States. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003; 52 1–14.


[3] Nassar N,  Sullivan EA. Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2001. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Perinatal Statistics Series; 2003 

[4] Medicare data accessed December 2003 Canberra: Federal Dept Health, Commonwealth of Australia; 2003 

[5] van der Klis KA,  Westenberg L,  Chan A,  Dekker G,  Keane RJ. Teenage pregnancy: trends, characteristics and outcomes in South Australia and Australia. Aust NZ J Public Health 2002; 26 125–31.


[6] Condon JT,  Donovan J,  Corkindale CJ. Adolescents’ attitudes and beliefs about pregnancy and parenthood: results from a school-based intervention program. Int J Adol Youth 2001; 9 245–56.


[7] Quinlivan JA,  Tan LH,  Steele A,  Black K. Impact of demographic factors, early family relationships and depressive symptomatology in teenage pregnancy. Aust NZ J Psych 2004; 38 197–203.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8] Hanna B. Adolescent parenthood: a costly mistake or a search for love? Repro Health Matters 2001; 9 101–7.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9] Williams C,  Vines SW. Broken past, fragile future. personal stories of high-risk adolescent mothers. J Soc Ped Nursing 1999; 4 15–23.


[10] Stevens-Simon C,  Kelly I,  Singer D,  Cox A. Why pregnant adolescents say they did not use contraceptives prior to conception. J Adol Health 1996; 19 48–53.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11] Quinlivan JA,  Evans SF. The impact of domestic violence in teenage pregnancy-a prospective cohort study. J Ped Adol Gynecol 2000; 14 17–23.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12] Arai L. Low expectations, sexual attitudes and knowledge: explaining teenage pregnancy and fertility in English communities. Insights from qualitative research. Sociol Rev 2003; 51 199–217.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13] Barrett G,  Smith SC,  Wellings K. Conceptualisation, development and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. J Epidemiol Com Health 2004; 58 426–33.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14] Quinlivan JA,  Evans SF. The impact of continuing illegal drug use on teenage pregnancy outcomes — a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2002; 109 1148–53.
PubMed |

[15] Stevens-Simon C,  Beach RK,  Klerman LV. To be rather than not to be — that is the problem with the questions we ask adolescents about their childbearing intentions. Arch Ped Adol Med 2001; 155 1298–300.


[16] Burack R. Teenage sexual behaviour: attitudes towards and declared sexual activity. Brit J Fam Plan 1999; 24 145–8.


[17] Unger JB,  Molina GB,  Teran L. Perceived consequences of teenage childbearing among adolescent girls in an urban sample. J Adol Health 2000; 26 205–12.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18] Condon J,  Corkingdale C,  Quinlivan JA,  Russel A. Teenage males attitudes and beliefs about teenage pregnancy. An interactive CD Rom study. Melbourne: Australian Society of Psychosocial Obstetrics and Gynaecology Annual Scientific Meeting; 2003 August 2003, Abstract 6.

[19] Geronimus AT. Damned if you do: culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57 881–93.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[20] Luker K. Dubious conceptions: the politics of teenage pregnancy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996 

[21] Furstenberg FF,  Brooks-Gunn J,  Chase-Lansdale L. Teenaged pregnancy and childbearing. Am Psychol 1989; 44 313–20.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[22] Hardy JB,  Welcher DW,  Stanley J,  Dallas JR. Long range outcome of adolescent pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1978; 21 1215–32.
PubMed |

[23] Geronimus AT,  Korenman S. The socio-economic consequences of teen childbearing reconsidered. Q J Econ 1992; 107 1187–214.


[24] Geronimus AT,  Korenman S. Maternal youth or family background? On the health disadvantages of infants with teenage mothers. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137 213–25.
PubMed |

[25] Holtz VJ,  McElroy SW,  Sanders SG. The costs and consequences of teenage childbearing for mothers. Chicago Policy Rev Fall 1996; 64 55–94.


[26] Ladner J. Tomorrow’s tomorrow: the black woman. New York: Doubleday; 1971 

[27] Geronimus AT. Black/white differences in the relationship between maternal age to birthweight: a population-based test of the weathering hypothesis. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42 589–97.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[28] Moore K,  Morrison DR,  Greene AD. Effects on the children born to adolescent mothers. In: Kids having kids. Washington DC: Urban Institute Press; 1997 p. 1–103.

[29] Chisholm J. Death, hope, and sex: steps to an evolutionary ecology of mind and mortality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999 

[30] Woodward L,  Fergusson DM,  Horwood LJ. Risk factors and life processes associated with teenage pregnancy: Results of a prospective study from birth to 20 years. J Marriage Fam 2001; 63 1170–84.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31] Najman JM,  Lanyon A,  Andersen M,  Williams G,  Bor W,  O’Callaghan M. Socioeconomic status and maternal cigarette smoking before, during and after a pregnancy. Aust N Z J Public Health 1998; 22 60–6.
PubMed |

[32] Scholl T,  Hediger M,  Belsky I. Prenatal care and maternal health during adolescent pregnancy: a review and meta-analysis. J Adol Health 1994; 15 444–56.


[33] Flanagan P,  Kokotailo P. Adolescent pregnancy and substance use. Clin Perinatol 1999; 26 185–200.
PubMed |

[34] Walker ARP. Cancer outlook — an African perspective. J R Soc Med 1995; 88 5–13.
PubMed |

[35] Rosenwaike I. Breast cancer mortality in relation to a measure of early childbearing. Int J Epidemiol 1980; 9 317–23.
PubMed |

[36] Walker AR,  Walker BF,  Stelma S. Is breast cancer avoidable? Could dietary changes help? Int J Food Sci Nutrit 1995; 46 373–81.


[37] Adam EK,  Gunnar MR,  Tanaka A. Adult attachment, parent emotion, and observed parenting behaviour: mediator and moderator models. Child Dev 2004; 75 110–22.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[38] Locke TF,  Newcomb M. Child maltreatment, parent alcohol and drug-related problems, polydrug problems, and parenting practices: a test of gender differences and four theoretical perspectives. J Fam Psych 2004; 18 120–34.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[39] Quinlivan JA,  Evans SF. Impact of domestic violence in pregnant teenagers on mother to child attachment. Sydney: Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting; 2004 

[40] National Child Protection Council Steering Group An audit of home visitor programs and the development of an evaluation framework. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1996 

[41] Olds DL,  Henderson CR,  Kitzman HJ,  Eckenrode JJ,  Cole RE,  Tatelbaum RC. Prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses: recent findings. Future Child 1999; 9 44–65.
PubMed |

[42] Olds DL,  Robinson J,  O’Brien R,  Luckey DW,  Pettitt LM, et al. Home visiting by paraprofessionals and nurses: a randomised controlled trial. Pediatrics 2002; 110 486–96.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[43] Quinlivan JA,  Box H,  Evans SF. Postnatal home visits in teenage mothers: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361 893–900.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[44] Stevens-Simon C,  Nelligan D,  Kelly L. Adolescents at risk for mistreating their children. II. A home- and clinic-based prevention program. Child Abuse Negl 2001; 25 753–69.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[45] Barnet B,  Duggan AK,  Devoe M,  Burrell L. The effect of volunteer home visitation for adolescent mothers on parenting and mental health outcomes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156 1216–22.
PubMed |

[46] Polit DF,  Kahn JR. Early subsequent pregnancy among economically disadvantaged teenage mothers. Am J Public Health 1986; 76(2): 167–71.
PubMed |

[47] Stevens-Simon C,  Dolgan JI,  Kelly L,  Singer D. The effect of monetary incentives and peer support groups on repeat adolescent pregnancies: a randomised trial of the Dollar-a-Day program. JAMA 1997; 277 977–82.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[48] Quinlivan JA,  Evans SF. Multidisciplinary teenage antenatal clinics are associated with improved pregnancy outcome. BJOG 2004; 111 571–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[49] DuPlessis HM,  Bell R,  Richards T. Adolescent pregnancy: understanding the impact of age and race on outcomes. J Adol Health 1997; 20 187–97.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[50] Van Enk WJ,  Gorissen WH,  van Enk A. Teenage pregnancy and ethnicity in The Netherlands: frequency and obstetric outcome. Europ J Contraception Repro Health Care 2000; 5 77–84.