Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

How can sedentarised pastoralists be more technically efficient? A case from eastern Inner Mongolia

Shuhao Tan A C , Tingyu Li A , Bo Liu A and Lynn Huntsinger B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Zhongguancun Street 59, Haidian District, 100872 Beijing, P.R. China.

B Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3110, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: shuhaotan@ruc.edu.cn

The Rangeland Journal 40(3) 241-249 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ17128
Submitted: 22 May 2017  Accepted: 19 March 2018   Published: 1 May 2018

Abstract

Technical efficiency (TE) means the effectiveness of production outputs attained for a given level of production inputs. This study examines pastoralist TE and its determinants for 416 pastoralist households from two leagues (prefectures) in eastern Inner Mongolia, a typical rangeland area in China. A one-step stochastic frontier method is applied to analyse data about household livestock production in 2011 to assess opportunities for increasing income and reducing poverty through increased TE. The main results show that pastoralists, in general, did not perform well with currently available technology, with the average TE score just 0.50 out of 1.0. Only about one-fifth (20.2%) of respondents had TE scores >0.7, and the same proportion had a TE score <0.3. More than one-quarter had TE scores in the range 0.3–0.5, and slightly more than one-third had TE scores in the range 0.5–0.7. About 83% of the variation in pastoralist livestock production is explained by the loss of TE. The age of the head of household, available pasture, investment in covered pens and participation in the rangeland rental market were found to influence TE. Encouraging younger pastoralists to enter pastoralism, and enlarging available grazing land through the rangeland rental market or cooperative rangeland use would likely enhance pastoralist performance; promoting investment in covered-pen construction could also improve productivity and alleviate a rangeland degradation cycle, which is pervasive in the study area.

Additional keywords: livestock production, rangeland degradation, rangeland rental market, stochastic frontier method.


References

Abdulai, A., and Tietje, H. (2007). Estimating technical efficiency under unobserved heterogeneity with stochastic frontier models: application to northern German dairy farms. European Review of Agricultural Economics 34, 393–416.
Estimating technical efficiency under unobserved heterogeneity with stochastic frontier models: application to northern German dairy farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Akiyama, T., and Kawamura, K. (2007). Grassland degradation in China: Methods of monitoring, management and restoration. Grassland Science 53, 1–17.
Grassland degradation in China: Methods of monitoring, management and restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Asner, G. P., Elmore, A. J., Olander, L. P., Martin, R. E., and Harris, A. T. (2004). Grazing systems, ecosystem responses and global change. Environmental Research 29, 261–299.

Bai, N., Tan, S. H., and Tanwen, L. J. (2016). A research on credit characteristics of typical pastoral herdsman household—case from Hulun Buir, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China. Chinese Price 2, 46–49.

Baráth, L., and Fertő, I. (2015). Heterogeneous technology, scale of land use and technical efficiency: The case of Hungarian crop farms. Land Use Policy 42, 141–150.
Heterogeneous technology, scale of land use and technical efficiency: The case of Hungarian crop farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bardhan, D., and Sharma, M. L. (2013). Technical efficiency in milk production in underdeveloped production environment of India. SpringerPlus 2, 65–71.
Technical efficiency in milk production in underdeveloped production environment of India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Battese, G. E., and Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 20, 325–332.
A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Battese, G. E., and Corra, G. S. (1977). Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of eastern Australia. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21, 169–179.
Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blench, R. (2001). ‘You can’t go home again: Pastoralism in the new millennium.’ (Overseas Development Institute: London.)

Chen, W. N., Yan, R. M., and Huang, H. Q. (2013). Living and sustainable capacity under climate change in the Xilin Gol grassland. Resources Science 35, 1075–1083.

Conte, T. J. (2015). The effects of China’s grassland contract policy on Mongolian herders’ attitudes towards grassland management in northeastern Inner Mongolia. Journal of Political Ecology 22, 79–97.
The effects of China’s grassland contract policy on Mongolian herders’ attitudes towards grassland management in northeastern Inner Mongolia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Conte, T. J., and Tilt, B. (2014). The effects of China’s grassland contract policy on pastoralists’ attitudes towards cooperation in an Inner Mongolian Banner. Human Ecology 42, 837–846.
The effects of China’s grassland contract policy on pastoralists’ attitudes towards cooperation in an Inner Mongolian Banner.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Du, W. C., Yan, T., Chang, S. H., Wang, Z. F., and Hou, F. J. (2017). Seasonal hogget grazing as a potential alternative grazing system for the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau: weight gain and animal behaviour under continuous or rotational grazing at high or low stocking rates. The Rangeland Journal 39, 329–339.
Seasonal hogget grazing as a potential alternative grazing system for the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau: weight gain and animal behaviour under continuous or rotational grazing at high or low stocking rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

FAO (2001). The pasture/forage resource profile for China. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: www.fao.org/ag/agp/agpc/doc/counprof/china/china1.htm#_Toc7780236 (accessed 4 December 2017).

Gao, L., Kinnucan, H. W., Zhang, Y., and Qiao, G. (2016). The effects of a subsidy for grassland protection on livestock numbers, grazing intensity, and herders’ income in Inner Mongolia. Land Use Policy 54, 302–312.
The effects of a subsidy for grassland protection on livestock numbers, grazing intensity, and herders’ income in Inner Mongolia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gaspar, P., Mesías, F. J., Escribano, M., and Pulido, F. (2009). Assessing the technical efficiency of extensive livestock farming systems in Extremadura, Spain. Livestock Science 121, 7–14.
Assessing the technical efficiency of extensive livestock farming systems in Extremadura, Spain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Geng, N., and Li, B. L. (2013). Analysis on influencing factor of technical efficiency of China’s meet sheep production and its regional difference: Based on stochastic frontier analysis method. Technology Economics 32, 25–32.

Greene, W. (2005). Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis 23, 7–32.
Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grönvall, A. (2015). Transition from nomadic pastoralism to livestock based agro-pastoralism. MSc Thesis, Department of Animal Nutrition & Management SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.

Guesmi, B., Serra, T., and Featherstone, A. (2015). Technical efficiency of Kansas arable crop farms: a local maximum likelihood approach. Agricultural Economics 46, 703–713.
Technical efficiency of Kansas arable crop farms: a local maximum likelihood approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gül, M., Demircan, V., Yilmaz, H., Yilmaz, H., Gül, M., Demircan, V., Yilmaz, H., and Yilmaz, H. (2016). Technical efficiency of goat farming in Turkey: a case study of Isparta province. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 45, 328–335.
Technical efficiency of goat farming in Turkey: a case study of Isparta province.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Han, N. Y. (2011). ‘The logic of grassland—adaptation and moderation: the future value of nomadic civilization.’ (Beijing Science and Technology Press: Beijing.)

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248.
The tragedy of the commons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF1M%2FjvVymsQ%3D%3D&md5=610e6f76d7ce60ae47256942067d291aCAS |

Hua, L., and Squires, V. R. (2015). Managing China’s pastoral lands: Current problems and future prospects. Land Use Policy 43, 129–137.
Managing China’s pastoral lands: Current problems and future prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huang, W., Brümmer, B., and Huntsinger, L. (2014). Technical efficiency, ecological efficiency and grassland ecological performance of grazing in China. In ‘The EAAE 2014 Congress on Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies’. (European Association of Agricultural Economists: Wageningen, The Netherlands.)

Huang, W., Bruemmer, B., and Huntsinger, L. (2016). Incorporating measures of grassland productivity into efficiency estimates for livestock grazing on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in China. Ecological Economics 122, 1–11.
Incorporating measures of grassland productivity into efficiency estimates for livestock grazing on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kemp, D., Brown, C., Han, G. D., Michalk, D., Nan, Z. B., Wu, J. P., and Xu, Z. (2011). Chinese grasslands: Problems, dilemmas and finding solutions. In ‘21st International Grassland Congress and 8th International Rangelands Congress’. (International Grassland Congress, International Rangelands Congress.)

Latruffe, L., Balcombe, K., Davidova, S., and Zawalinska, K. (2004). Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland. Applied Economics 36, 1255–1263.
Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li, W., and Huntsinger, L. (2011). China’s grassland contract policy and its impacts on herder ability to benefit in Inner Mongolia: Tragic feedbacks. Ecology and Society 16, art 1.
China’s grassland contract policy and its impacts on herder ability to benefit in Inner Mongolia: Tragic feedbacks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li, X. L., Yuan, Q. H., Wan, L. Q., and He, F. (2008). Perspectives on livestock production systems in China. The Rangeland Journal 30, 211–220.
Perspectives on livestock production systems in China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXos1Sku74%3D&md5=4db7ed6275a72bbb1ac417225e47dc35CAS |

Li, Y., Wang, Y., and Schwarze, R. (2014). Pathways to sustainable grassland development in China. Findings of three case studies. UFZ Discussion Papers. UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.

Lise, W., Hess, S., and Purev, B. (2006). Pastureland degradation and poverty among herders in Mongolia: Data analysis and game estimation. Ecological Economics 58, 350–364.
Pastureland degradation and poverty among herders in Mongolia: Data analysis and game estimation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ma, H. Y., Tang, H. C., and Rae, A. (2007). Analysis of total factor productivity of milk production in China. Chinese Rural Economy 2, 40–48.

McGahey, G., Davies, J., Hagelberg, N., and Quedraogo, R. (2014). ‘Pastoralism and greening economy—a natural nexus?’ (IUCN and UNEP: Nairobi.)

Mlote, N. (2013). Estimating technical efficiency of small scale beef cattle fattening in the lake zone in Tanzania. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 5, 197–207.
Estimating technical efficiency of small scale beef cattle fattening in the lake zone in Tanzania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Onono, J. O., Amimo, J. O., and Rushton, J. (2015). Constraints and efficiency of cattle marketing in semiarid pastoral system in Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production 47, 691–697.
Constraints and efficiency of cattle marketing in semiarid pastoral system in Kenya.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Otieno, D. J., Hubbard, L., and Ruto, E. (2014). Assessment of technical efficiency and its determinants in beef cattle production in Kenya. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 6, 267–278.
Assessment of technical efficiency and its determinants in beef cattle production in Kenya.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ribot, J. C., and Peluso, N. L. (2003). A theory of access. Rural Sociology 68, 153–181.
A theory of access.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shomo, F., Ahmed, M., Shideed, K., and Aw, A. (2010). Sources of technical efficiency of sheep production systems in dry areas in Syria. Small Ruminant Research 91, 160–169.
Sources of technical efficiency of sheep production systems in dry areas in Syria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sternberg, T. (2008). Environmental challenges in Mongolia’s dryland pastoral landscape. Journal of Arid Environments 72, 1294–1304.
Environmental challenges in Mongolia’s dryland pastoral landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tan, S. H., and Tan, Z. C. (2017). Grassland tenure, livelihood assets and pastoralists’ resilience: evidence and empirical analyses from Western China. Economic and Political Studies 5, 381–403.
Grassland tenure, livelihood assets and pastoralists’ resilience: evidence and empirical analyses from Western China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tan, S. H., Wang, J. M., Qin, T., and Qu, F. T. (2008). Determinants of sustainable common pool resource use at micro level. Journal of Natural Resources 23, 194–203.

Tan, S. H., Liu, B., Zhang, Q. Y., Zhu, Y., Yang, J. H., and Fang, X. J. (2017). Understanding grassland rental markets and their determinants in eastern Inner Mongolia, PR China. Land Use Policy 67, 733–741.
Understanding grassland rental markets and their determinants in eastern Inner Mongolia, PR China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor, J. L. (2006). Negotiating the grassland: The policy of pasture enclosures and contested resource use in Inner Mongolia. Human Organization 65, 374–386.
Negotiating the grassland: The policy of pasture enclosures and contested resource use in Inner Mongolia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tian, Y. M. (2011). Report on the development of pastoral areas in Inner Mongolia. Northern Economy 11, 23–29.

Tian, C. Y., and Xiao, H. F. (2014). Income and income gap analysis of herdsmen in China. Agricultural Economics and Management 6, 40–47.

Undargaa, S., and Mccarthy, J. F. (2016). Beyond Property: Co-management and pastoral resource access in Mongolia. World Development 77, 367–379.
Beyond Property: Co-management and pastoral resource access in Mongolia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang, X. Y. (2013). Grassland drought in the context of institution change—impacts of pastoral sedenterization, pasture segmentation and market economy. China Agricultural University Journal (Social Sciences Edition) 30, 18–30.

Wang, H. J., and Schmidt, P. (2002). One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 129–144.
One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xktl2ntr8%3D&md5=d2a37c5fdc7c6c0f175be62753212964CAS |

Wu, X., Li, P., Jiang, C., Liu, P., He, J., and Hou, X. (2014). Climate changes during the past 31 years and their contribution to the changes in the productivity of rangeland vegetation in the Inner Mongolian typical steppe. The Rangeland Journal 36, 519–526.
Climate changes during the past 31 years and their contribution to the changes in the productivity of rangeland vegetation in the Inner Mongolian typical steppe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yang, L. (2008). Perfecting the grassland resource management system. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 40, 33–36.

Yang, Z. H., Zhang, J. P., and Shi, Y. M. (2016). The impact of the fall of live sheep price on herdsman’s Income - an investigation on the development of sheep industry in Tianzhu County, Gansu Province. Pratacultural Science 33, 173–175.

Zhang, Y. F., Kang, Z. J., and Yan, Z. F. (2016). Introspecting on the sheep industry. Journal of Animal Science 52, 50–53.

Zhou, L., and Dong, X. Y. (2013). Systematic logic concerning the problems of pastoral area, animal husbandry and herdsman–research on pasture management and property rights system transition in China. Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition) 30, 94–107.

Zhou, L., and Jiang, Z. Q. (2011). Competitive Husbandry, grasslands ecology and the maintenance of pastoral livelihoods. Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition) 28, 130–138.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXls12murw%3D&md5=90e1f983572f918e4f3c3fddd4148195CAS |