Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > RJ > RJ06013
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 28(1)

Biological control of rangeland weeds in Australia

M. H. Julien
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

CSIRO Entomology, 120 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, QLD 4068, Australia; Present address: CSIRO Entomology, European Laboratory, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34980 Montfellier sur Lez, France.
Email: mic.julien@csiro-europe.org

The Rangeland Journal 28(1) 47-54 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ06013
Submitted: 2 February 2006  Accepted: 13 February 2006   Published: 29 May 2006

Abstract

Weeds of Australian rangelands have been the target for biological control since 1914. There have been several spectacular successes, e.g. prickly pear cactus (Opuntia spp.), with extraordinary ecological and commercial benefits. There have also been projects where no positive outcome has occurred, e.g. prickly acacia [Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Delile ssp. indica (Benth.) Brenan], parkinsonia (Parkinsonia aculeata L.), and creeping lantana [Lantana montevidensis (Spreng.) Briq.]. Numerous other projects are currently underway and require continuing support to achieve the stated aims. There is considerable potential to increase investment in biological control of rangeland weeds to improve outcomes of current projects and to implement new projects. There is promise of excellent benefits to cost ratios based on past performance. However, there is a worrying trend of loss of capacity in Australia to conduct biological control. Since resources will always be limited, it is important that the weeds that have the greatest impact on ecosystem function and commercial production are identified and targeted for management. Biological control should be part of the management strategies for those priority weeds when conflict over weediness v. commercial value can be resolved in favour of biological control, and when it is considered that biological control could offer benefits.

Additional keywords: benefit to cost ratios, impacts, weed management strategies.


Acknowledgments

Tony Grice and Tara Martin made comments for early drafts and John Scott and Bill Palmer provided suggestions that improved the final version.


References


Anderson F. , Pettit W. , Morin L. , Briese D. T. , and McLaren D. A. (2004). Pathogens for the biological control of weedy stipoid grasses in Australia: completion of investigations in Argentina. In: ‘Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds’. (Eds J. M. Cullen, D. T. Briese, D. J. Kriticos, W. M. Lonsdale, L. Morin and J. K. Scott.) pp. 69–74. (CSIRO: Canberra.)

Cullen J. M. (1978). Evaluating the success of the programme for the biological control of Chondrilla juncea L. In: ‘Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds’. (Ed. T. E. Freeman.) pp. 117–121. (University of Florida: Gainesville.)

Delfosse E. S. , and Cullen J. M. (1981). New acivities in biological control of weeds in Australia. II. Echium plantagineum: curse or salvation? In: ‘Proceedings of the V International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds’. (Ed. E. S. Delfosse.) pp. 563–574. (CSIRO: Melbourne.)

DeLoach C. J. , Carruthers R. I. , Dudley T. L. , Eberts D. , Kazmer D. J. , et al (2003). First results for control of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the open field in the western United States. In: ‘Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds’. (Eds J. M. Cullen, D. T. Briese, D. J. Kriticos, W. M. Lonsdale, L. Morin and J. K. Scott.) pp. 505–513. (CSIRO: Melbourne.)

Evans H. C. (1995). Report on a visit to Argentina to survey for fungal pathogens of Xanthium spinosum. November 1995, CABI Biosciences, Unpublished report.

Evans H. C. , and Ellison C. A. (1995). Report on a survey for fungal pathogens of Xanthium spinosum in Argentina. March 1995, CABI Biosciences, Unpublished report.

Flanagan G. L. , Hills L. A. , and Wilson C. G. (2000). The successful biological control of spinyhead sida, Sida acuta [Malvaceae], by Calligrapha pantherina (Col: Chrysomelidae) in Australia’s Northern Territory. In: ‘Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds’. (Ed. N. R. Spencer.) pp. 35–41. (Montana State University: Montana.)

Forno W. (1997). Procedures in biological control of weeds. In: ‘Biological control of weeds: theory and practical application’. ACIAR Monograph No. 49. (Eds M. H. Julien and G. White.) pp. 47–49. (ACIAR: Canberra.)

Grace B. S. , Gardener M. R. , and Cameron A. G. (2004). Pest or pasture? Introduced pasture grasses in the Northern Territory. In: ‘Proceedings of the 14th Australian Weeds Conference’. 6–9 September 2004. (Eds B. M. Sindel and S. B. Johnson.) pp. 157–160. (Weed Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Grice A. (Ed.) (2002). Weeds of significance to the grazing industries of Australia. Report for Meat and Livestock Australia and the Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management, December 2002.

Harley K. L. S. , and Forno I. W. (1992). ‘Biological control of weeds. A handbook for practitioners and students.’ (Inkata Press: Melbourne.)

Julien M. (2002). Biological control of tropical weeds with Central and South American origin: current activities by CSIRO Entomology. In: ‘Proceedings of the 13th Australian Weeds Conference’. (Eds H. Spafford Jacob, J. Dodd and J. H. Moore.) pp. 361–365. (Plant Protection Society of Western Australia.)

Julien M. , Storrie A. , and McCosker R. (2004). Lippia, Phyla canescens, an increasing threat to agriculture and the environment. In: ‘Proceedings of the 14th Australian Weeds Conference’. (Eds B. M. Sindel and S. B. Johnson.) pp. 476–479. (Weed Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Julien M. H. , and Griffiths M. W. (1998). ‘Biological control of weeds. A world catalogue of agents and their target weeds.’ 4th edn (CAB International: Wallingford.)

McFadyen R. E. C. (1998) Biological control of weeds. Annual Review of Entomology 43, 369–393.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Page A. R. , and Lacey K. L. (2006). ‘Economic impact assessment of Australian weed biological control effort.’ Technical Series No. 10. (CRC for Australian Weed Management: Adelaide.)

Parsons W. T. , and Cuthbertson E. G. (2001). ‘Noxious weeds of Australia’. 2nd edn (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Paynter Q. (2005) Evaluating the impact of a biological control agent Carmenta mimosa on the woody wetland weed Mimosa pigra in Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 1054–1062.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Paynter Q. (2006) Evaluating the impact of biological control against Mimosa pigra in Australia: comparing litterfall before and after the introduction of biological control agents. Biological Control (In press). 37, open url image1

Paynter Q., Flanagan G. (2004) Integrating herbicide and mechanical control treatments with fire and biological control to manage an invasive wetland shrub, Mimosa pigra. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 615–629.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Room P. M., Harley K. L. S., Forno I. W., Sands D. P. A. (1981) Successful control of the floating weed salvinia. Nature 294, 78–80.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Scott J. K. (2005). Review of biological control of weeds in Australia – current status and future development. Australian Weeds Committee paper, Unpublished report.

Smyth A. K., James C. D. (2004) Characteristics of Australia’s rangelands and key design issues for monitoring biodiversity. Austral Ecology 29, 3–15.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Thorpe J. R. , and Lynch R. (2000). ‘The cetermination of weeds of national significance.’ (National Weeds Strategy Executive Committee: Launceston.)

Van Klinken R., Julien M. H. (2003) Learning from past attempts: does classical biological control of noogoora burr (Asteraceae: Xanthium occidentale) have a promising future? Biocontrol Science and Technology 13, 139–153.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Van Klinken R., Fichera G., Cordo H. (2003a) Targeting biological control across diverse landscapes: the release, establishment and early success of two insects on mesquite (Prosopis spp.) insects in Australian rangelands. Biological Control 26, 8–20.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Van Klinken R. , Panetta F. D. , Ross B. , and Wilson C. (2003 b). A pain in the grass: what’s the diagnosis? In: ‘Proceedings of the 14th Australian Weeds Conference’. (Eds B. M. Sindel and S. B. Johnson.) pp. 480–483. (Weed Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Vitelli J., Pitt J. (2006) Assessment of current weed control methods relevant to the management of the biodiversity of Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 28, 37–46.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Witt A. B. R. , and McConnachie A. J. (2004). The potential for classical biological control of invasive grass species with special reference to invasive Sporobolus spp. (Poaceae) in Australia. In: ‘Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds’. (Eds J. M. Cullen, D. T. Briese, D. J. Kriticos, W. M. Lonsdale, L. Morin and J. K. Scott.) pp. 198–202. (CSIRO: Melbourne.)









1The requirements and forms for these applications are available online at: www.affa.gov.au/content/output.cfm?ObjectID=E1803CD4-D51B-4639-8E9649EC42F2E8A6#_en2.

2www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/lists/import/index.html.