Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Assessment of current weed control methods relevant to the management of the biodiversity of Australian rangelands

J. S. Vitelli A C and J. L. Pitt B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CRC for Australian Weed Management, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia. Current address: Tropical Weeds Research Centre, Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Water, PO Box 187, Charters Towers, Qld 4820, Australia.

B Rural Solutions, Department of Primary Industries and Resources, PO Box 822, Clare, SA 5453, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: joseph.vitelli@nrm.qld.gov.au

The Rangeland Journal 28(1) 37-46 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ06016
Submitted: 17 February 2006  Accepted: 16 March 2006   Published: 29 May 2006

Abstract

The Australian rangelands contain extensive and often dense populations of a wide variety of weed species. An array of techniques is available for effectively controlling many of these. To achieve long-term weed control, weeds should be targeted objectively and the dependence on the use of single treatments such as herbicides and machinery reduced, with greater adoption of integrated methods. The combination of methods will differ if the primary objective within the rangelands is to restore and maintain biodiversity or to improve forage production for domestic and native animals. Revegetation of sites and exclusion of herbivores from weed treated areas is important in establishing species that will compete with invasive weeds. Due to rangelands being sparsely populated, the necessary equipment, skills and finances to use appropriate control options on extensive weed infestations are often lacking, with landholders requiring the assistance of local, state and federal authorities to assist in managing weeds.

Additional keyword: integrated management.


Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Drs Tony Grice and Nigel Ainsworth, Barbara Madigan, and Marie Vitelli for their constructive comments on the manuscript.


References


Andersen A. N., Cook G. D., Corbett L. K., Douglas M. M., Eager R. W., Russell-Smith J., Setterfield S. A., Williams R. J., Woinarski J. C. Z. (2005) Fire frequency and biodiversity conservation in Australian tropical savannas: implications from the Kapalga fire experiment. Austral Ecology 30, 155–167.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 31 March 2006).

Bangsund D. A., Nudell D. J., Sell R. S., Leistritz F. L. (2001) Economic analysis of using sheep to control leafy spurge. Journal of Range Management 54, 322–329. (accessed 31 March 2006).

Craig A. B. (1999) Fire management of rangelands in the Kimberley low-rainfall zone: a review. The Rangeland Journal 21, 39–70.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 31 March 2006).

Weeds Australia (2004 b). ‘Weed spread.’ Available online at: www.weeds.org.au/docs/weedspread1.pdf (accessed 31 March 2006).

Weeds Australia (2004 c). ‘National CNG Taskforce newsletter.’ Available online at: www.weeds.org.au/WoNS/Chileanneedlegrass/CNGNews.pdf (accessed 31 March 2006).