Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

204 Efficient editing of porcine parthenogenetic zygotes by electroporation of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes

F. L. Ongaratto A , P. Rodriguez-Villamil A , U. Ganbaatar A , C. De Frutos A , S. Solin A and D. F. Carlson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Recombinetics Inc., St Paul, MN, USA

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 31(1) 227-227 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv31n1Ab204
Published online: 3 December 2018

Abstract

Gene editing by microinjection is an efficient system to produce mutant livestock; however, microinjection is time-consuming and requires special skill, limiting its use for large-scale production of gene-edited animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a system to deliver guide (g)RNA/Cas9/ribonucleoprotein (RNP) by electroporation into parthenogenic porcine zygotes. For experiment 1, we delivered gRNA/Cas9 RNP (250 ng μL−1 of each), targeting GATA4 using 2 electroporation conditions. Group 1 (n = 130): 20V, 3 ms, ×2 pulses, 1 repeat; group 2 (n = 102): 20V, 1 ms, ×2 pulses, 2 repeats; and Control (n = 96): parthenogenic zygotes, no electroporation. For experiment 2, we delivered gRNA/Cas9 RNP (250 ng μL−1 of each) targeting ROSA26 by electroporation with 4 conditions compared with delivery of RNP by microinjection: group 1 (n = 17): 20V, 3 ms, ×1 pulses, 1 repeat; group 2 (n = 49): 20V, 3 ms, ×3 pulses, 1 repeat; group 3 (n = 64): 30V, 3 ms, ×1 pulses, 1 repeat; group 4 (n = 61): 30V, 3 ms, ×3 pulses, 1 repeat; group 5 (n = 120): zygotes microinjected with Cas9/ROSA26 sgRNA (25/25 ng μL−1), and Control (n = 76): parthenogenic zygotes, no electroporation. The electroporated zygotes were cultured in porcine zygote medium-3 (PZM-3) with controlled atmosphere, and development was evaluated on Day 2 (cleavage) and Day 7 (blastocyst rate). Gene editing was evaluated on embryos (blastocyst and morulas) by PCR and Sanger sequencing of amplicons including the RNP target site. Data were compared using chi-squared test, and differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. Cleavage rates in experiment 1 were similar for the control (86/96; 89.5%), group 1 (94/102; 92.1%), and group 2 (119/130; 91.5%). Blastocyst rates were higher for the control (46/96; 47%) than for the other groups (P < 0.01). However, for the treated groups, the blastocyst rates were similar, group 1 (19/102; 9.2%) and group 2 (12/130; 18.6%). Furthermore, the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) efficiency was similar for groups 1 (14/18; 77.7%) and 2 (14/17; 82.3%). In experiment 2, the cleavage (53/76; 69%) and blastocyst rates (30/76; 39%) were significantly higher for the control than for the treated groups (P < 0.01). Among the groups, the lower cleavage and blastocyst rates were for group 4 (20/61; 32.7% and 3/61; 4.9%, respectively) compared with the other electroporation and microinjection groups (P < 0.03). However, NHEJ efficiency was higher for electroporation groups 2 (6/8; 75%), 3 (17/17; 100%), and 4 (2/2; 100%) compared with microinjection (2/15; 13%). In conclusion, electroporation of Cas9/RNP is an efficient alternative to microinjection for gene editing in porcine zygotes.