Australian healthcare professionals’ beliefs and practice behaviours in management of chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional survey
Jennifer Vardy
A * , Edwina Chan A , Marika Hart A , Rebecca Dallin A , Emma Wise A , Emmanuel Karantanis B C and Darren Beales A
A
B
C
Abstract
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common and debilitating condition, and sufferers present to healthcare professionals with variable complex symptoms and co-morbidities. This study aimed to investigate the current beliefs and practice behaviours of healthcare professionals towards the management of CPP in Australian females.
We distributed an online survey to Australian healthcare professionals. Participants were questioned regarding their beliefs, the importance of various contributing factors and assessment variables, and their management preferences for two CPP vignettes. Demographic information and responses were analysed with descriptive statistics.
Complete data were obtained and analysed from 446 respondents including gynaecologists (n = 75), general practitioners (GPs) (n = 184) and physiotherapists (n = 187). Most of the respondents were female (88.1%), with male (11.7%) and other (0.2%) making up a smaller representation. Physiotherapists rated themselves higher in understanding mechanisms of CPP (64.7% very good to excellent) compared to gynaecologists (41.3%) and GPs (22.8%). Physiotherapists also reported higher levels of confidence in managing patients with CPP (57.8% quite or extremely confident) compared to 41.3% of gynaecologists and 22.3% of GPs who reported being quite or extremely confident. All three professions rated patient’s beliefs (89.8%), nervous system sensitisation (85.7%), stress/anxiety/depression (91.9%), fear avoidance (83.3%), history of sexual/emotional/physical abuse (94.1%) and pelvic floor muscle function (85.0%) as very/extremely important factors in the development of chronic pelvic pain. Most gynaecologists (71.0%) and GPs (70.2%) always referred for pelvic ultrasound during assessment. Physiotherapists assessed goal setting (88.8%) and screened for patients’ beliefs (80.9%) more often than gynaecologists (30.4% and 39.1% respectively) and GPs (46.5% and 29.0% respectively).
All three groups of healthcare professionals demonstrated a good understanding of pain mechanisms and incorporated a biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approach to management of females with chronic pelvic pain. However, both gynaecologists and GPs were less confident in their understanding of and management of CPP, and less likely to consider patient beliefs and goals. The findings of this online survey may assist in the provision of more targeted education to further improve management of this condition.
Keywords: biopsychosocial approach, chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis, e-survey, general practitioners, gynaecologists, persistent pelvic pain, physiotherapists.
References
Ahangari A (2014) Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review. Pain Physician 17(2), E141-E147.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Armour M, Lawson K, Wood A, Smith CA, Abbott J (2019) The cost of illness and economic burden of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain in Australia: a national online survey. PLoS ONE 14(10), e0223316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Armour M, Sinclair J, Ng CHM, Hyman MS, Lawson K, Smith CA, Abbott J (2020) Endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain have similar impact on women, but time to diagnosis is decreasing: an Australian survey. Scientific Reports 10(1), 16253.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beales D, Hope JB, Hoff TS, Sandvik H, Wergeland O, Fary R (2015) Current practice in management of pelvic girdle pain amongst physiotherapists in Norway and Australia. Manual Therapy 20(1), 109-116.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Beaumont T, Goode K (2017) Identifying the pathway to conservative pelvic floor physiotherapy in a tertiary public hospital in Australia: a retrospective audit. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 15, 2.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brennen R, Sherburn M, Rosamilia A (2019) Development, implementation and evaluation of an advanced practice in continence and women’s health physiotherapy model of care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 59(3), 450-456.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Engeler DS, Baranowski AP, Dinis-Oliveira P, Elneil S, Hughes J, Messelink EJ, van Ophoven A, Williams AC, European Association of Urology (2013) The 2013 EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain: is management of chronic pelvic pain a habit, a philosophy, or a science? 10 years of development. European Urology 64(3), 431-439.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Engeler D, Baranowski AP, Berghmans B, Borovicka J, Cottrell A, Dinis-Oliveira P, Elneil S, Hughes J, Messelink E, AC Williams (2020) EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. European Association of Urology. Available at https://uroweb.org/guideline/chronic-pelvic-pain/
Farrow VA, Bosch J, Crawford JN, Snead C, Schulkin J (2018) Screening for history of childhood abuse: beliefs, practice patterns, and barriers among obstetrician-gynecologists. Women’s Health Issues 28(6), 559-568.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Green R, Mardon AK, Beaumont T, Phillips K, Chalmers KJ (2022) The accessibility of pelvic health physiotherapy for adolescents with persistent pelvic pain: a qualitative framework analysis. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 40(5), 973-982.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Grossnickle KEH, Wiley S, Zipple JT, Kegerreis S (2019) Experiences of physical therapists working with women with chronic pelvic pain: a phenomenological qualitative study. Journal of Women’s Health Physical Therapy 43(2), 61-72.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Holopainen R, Simpson P, Piirainen A, Karppinen J, Schütze R, Smith A, O’Sullivan P, Kent P (2020) Physiotherapists’ perceptions of learning and implementing a biopsychosocial intervention to treat musculoskeletal pain conditions: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Pain 161(6), 1150-1168.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kalfas M, Chisari C, Windgassen S (2022) Psychosocial factors associated with pain and health-related quality of life in endometriosis: a systematic review. European Journal of Pain 26(9), 1827-1848.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gülmezoglu M, Khan KS (2006) WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 6, 177.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Malik A, Sinclair J, Ng CHM, Smith CA, Abbott J, Armour M (2022) Allied health and complementary therapy usage in Australian women with chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health 22(1), 37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Mardon AK, Leake HB, Szeto K, Astill T, Hilton S, Moseley GL, Chalmers KJ (2021) Treatment recommendations for the management of persistent pelvic pain: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 129(8), 1248-1260.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mcgowan L, Pitts M, Carter DC (1999) Chronic pelvic pain: the general practitioner’s perspective. Psychology, Health & Medicine 4(3), 303-317.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meriwether KV, Griego JL, Jansen SM, Abudushalamu F, Petersen TR, Dunivan GC, Komesu YM, Page-Reeves J (2023) Beliefs and narratives associated with the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 30(3), 216-229.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Mitchell T, Beales D, Slater H, O’Sullivan P (2017) ‘Musculoskeletal clinical translation framework: from knowing to doing.’ (Curtin University: Perth, Australia). Available at https://www.musculoskeletalframework.net/
National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (2017) Endometriosis: diagnosis and management Vol. 2021. NICE guideline. (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: London) Available at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng73
Nygaard AS, Stedenfeldt M, Øian P, Haugstad GK (2019) Characteristics of women with chronic pelvic pain referred to physiotherapy treatment after multidisciplinary assessment: a cross-sectional study. Scandinavian Journal of Pain 19(2), 355-364.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
RANZCOG (2021) Australian Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists RANZCOG, Melbourne, Australia. Available at https://ranzcog.edu.au/news/release-of-australian-endometriosis-guideline
Schwind B, Gross K, Tschudin S, Wehner N, Lagro-Janssen T (2015) Variations in gynaecologists’ reasoning over a pelvic pain vignette: what does it tell us on empowering approaches? Freiburger Zeitschrift für GeschlechterStudien 21, 69-89.
| Google Scholar |
Søndenå P, Dalusio-King G, Hebron C (2020) Conceptualisation of the therapeutic alliance in physiotherapy: is it adequate? Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 46, 102131.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Toye F, Seers K, Barker K (2014) A meta-ethnography of patients’ experiences of chronic pelvic pain: struggling to construct chronic pelvic pain as ‘real’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 70(12), 2713-2727.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Wang XH, Xu JJ, Yang G, Xin TY (2019) Impact of ultrasound diagnosis for chronic pelvic pain: a protocol for systematic review. Medicine 98(39), e17281.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
