Pacific Conservation Biology and Clarivate’s Web of Science

References

Clarivate (2020a). Web of Science: summary of coverage. Available at: https://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/coverage [accessed 28 July 2020].

Clarivate (2020b). Web of Science journal evaluation process and selection criteria. Available at: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/journal-evaluation-process-and-selection-criteria/ [accessed 28 July 2020].

MacRoberts, M. H., and MacRoberts, B. R. (2018). The mismeasure of science: citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69, 474–482.
| The mismeasure of science: citation analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

SCImago (2020). SJR — SCImago journal and country rank. Available at: http://www.scimagojr.com [accessed 28 July 2020].

Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 43, 628–638.

Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314, 498–502.
| Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics 92, 211–238.
| Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., and Sivertsen, G. (2017). Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: revisiting Seglen’s work on journal impact and research evaluation. PLoS One 12, e0174205.
| Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: revisiting Seglen’s work on journal impact and research evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |