There are many ways for research to be influential, not just citations

References

Abramo, G, D’Angelo, CA, and Grilli, L (2021). The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior. Journal of Informetrics 15, 101204.
| The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Adler R, Ewing J, Taylor P (2008) Citation statistics. A report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS). (International Mathematical Union)

Baccini, A, De Nicolao, G, and Petrovich, E (2019a). Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: a country-level comparative analysis. PLoS ONE 14, e0221212.
| Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: a country-level comparative analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baccini, A, Petrovich, E, and De Nicolao, G (2019b). Evaluating Italy’s ranking boom. Nature 576, 213.
| Evaluating Italy’s ranking boom.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bavelas, JB (1978). The social psychology of citations. Canadian Psychological Review/Psychologie Canadienne 19, 158–163.
| The social psychology of citations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Biagioli, M (2016). Watch out for cheats in citation game. Nature 535, 201.
| Watch out for cheats in citation game.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bollen, J, Van de Sompel, H, Hagberg, A, and Chute, R (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE 4, e6022.
| A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boon, PI (2022). Is poor mental health an unrecognised occupational health and safety hazard for conservation biologists and ecologists? Reported incidences, likely causes and possible solutions. Pacific Conservation Biology , .
| Is poor mental health an unrecognised occupational health and safety hazard for conservation biologists and ecologists? Reported incidences, likely causes and possible solutions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Buela-Casal, G (2014). Pathological publishing: a new psychological disorder with legal consequences? The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 6, 91–97.
| Pathological publishing: a new psychological disorder with legal consequences?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Buela-Casal, G, and Zych, I (2012). What do the scientists think about the impact factor? Scientometrics 92, 281–292.
| What do the scientists think about the impact factor?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Butler, L (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications – the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy 32, 143–155.
| Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications – the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Butler, L (2017). Response to van den Besselaar et al.: what happens when the Australian context is misunderstood. Journal of Informetrics 11, 919–922.
| Response to van den Besselaar et al.: what happens when the Australian context is misunderstood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Charlton, BG, and Andras, P (2008). ‘Down-shifting’ among top UK scientists? – The decline of ‘revolutionary science’ and the rise of ‘normal science’ in the UK compared with the USA. Medical Hypotheses 70, 465–472.
| ‘Down-shifting’ among top UK scientists? – The decline of ‘revolutionary science’ and the rise of ‘normal science’ in the UK compared with the USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chevassus-au-Louis N (2019) ‘Fraud in the lab: the high stakes of scientific research.’ (Harvard University Press: Harvard)

Crawford, SM (2017). Goodhart’s law: when waiting times became a target, they stopped being a good measure. BMJ 359, j5425.
| Goodhart’s law: when waiting times became a target, they stopped being a good measure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davies, M, and Calma, A (2019). Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1947–2016: a retrospective using citation and social network analyses. Global Intellectual History 4, 181–203.
| Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1947–2016: a retrospective using citation and social network analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Else, H (2021). Row erupts over university’s use of research metrics in job-cut decisions. Nature 592, 19.
| Row erupts over university’s use of research metrics in job-cut decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Falagas, ME, and Alexiou, VG (2008). The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 56, 223–226.
| The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finkel, A (2019). To move research from quantity to quality, go beyond good intentions. Nature 566, 297.
| To move research from quantity to quality, go beyond good intentions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fire, M, and Guestrin, C (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action. GigaScience 8, giz053.
| Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fong, EA, and Wilhite, AW (2017). Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research. PLoS ONE 12, e0187394.
| Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hicks, D, Wouters, P, Waltman, L, de Rijcke, S, and Rafols, I (2015). Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520, 429–431.
| Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hodge, DR, and Lacasse, JR (2011). Ranking disciplinary journals with the Google Scholar h-index: a new tool for constructing cases for tenure, promotion, and other professional decisions. Journal of Social Work Education 47, 579–596.
| Ranking disciplinary journals with the Google Scholar h-index: a new tool for constructing cases for tenure, promotion, and other professional decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jacso, P (2012). Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports databases: reflections on Vanclay’s criticism. Scientometrics 92, 325–354.
| Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports databases: reflections on Vanclay’s criticism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lamba, I (2021). Losing the numbers game: revisiting quality metrics through the spectrum of Goodhart’s law. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 28, 176–177.
| Losing the numbers game: revisiting quality metrics through the spectrum of Goodhart’s law.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawrence, PA (2002). Rank injustice. Nature 415, 835–836.
| Rank injustice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawrence, PA, and Locke, M (1997). A man for our season. Nature 386, 757–758.
| A man for our season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martin, B (2000). Research grants: problems and options. Australian Universities’ Review 43, 17–22.

Martin, B (2011). ERA: adverse consequences. Australian Universities’ Review 53, 99–102.

Martin B (2012) Breaking the siege: guidelines for struggle in science. In ‘Science under siege: zoology under threat’. (Eds P Banks, D Lunney, C Dickmam) pp. 164–170. (Royal Zoological Society of NSW: Mosman, NSW)

Martin, BR (2017). When social scientists disagree: comments on the Butler-van den Besselaar debate. Journal of Informetrics 11, 937–940.
| When social scientists disagree: comments on the Butler-van den Besselaar debate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McKiernan, EC, Schimanski, LA, Nieves, CM, Matthias, L, Niles, MT, and Alperin, JP (2019). Meta-research: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. eLife 8, e47338.
| Meta-research: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miccoli, P, and Rumiati, RI (2019). Italy’s evaluators: rankings boom is real. Nature 574, 486.
| Italy’s evaluators: rankings boom is real.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pacchioni G (2018) ‘The overproduction of truth: passion, competition and integrity in modern science.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford)

Parr C (2014) ‘Imperial College London to ‘review procedures’ after death of academic.’ (Times Higher Education)

Pyke, GH (2013). Struggling scientists: please cite our papers!. Current Science 105, 1061–1066.

Pyke, GH (2014). Achieving research excellence and citation success: what’s the point and how do you do it? BioScience 64, 90–91.
| Achieving research excellence and citation success: what’s the point and how do you do it?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sud, P, and Thelwall, M (2014). Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics 98, 1131–1143.
| Evaluating altmetrics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thor, A, Bornmann, L, Haunschild, R, and Leydesdorff, L (2021). Which are the influential publications in the Web of Science subject categories over a long period of time? CRExplorer software used for big-data analyses in bibliometrics. Journal of Information Science 47, 419–428.
| Which are the influential publications in the Web of Science subject categories over a long period of time? CRExplorer software used for big-data analyses in bibliometrics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van den Besselaar, P, Heyman, U, and Sandström, U (2017). Perverse effects of output-based research funding? Butler’s Australian case revisited. Journal of Informetrics 11, 905–918.
| Perverse effects of output-based research funding? Butler’s Australian case revisited.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Wesel, M (2016). Evaluation by citation: trends in publication behavior, evaluation criteria, and the strive for high impact publications. Science and Engineering Ethics 22, 199–225.
| Evaluation by citation: trends in publication behavior, evaluation criteria, and the strive for high impact publications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wade, N (1975). Citation analysis: a new tool for science administrators. Science 188, 429–432.
| Citation analysis: a new tool for science administrators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |