An Indigenous-assisted cultural perspective on conservation of New Zealand soils and the biota dependent on them
Victor Meyer
A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Environmental Management, Lincoln University, Lincoln, 7647, New Zealand.
Pacific Conservation Biology 29(6) 465-470 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC22031
Submitted: 8 August 2022 Accepted: 5 February 2023 Published: 2 March 2023
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY)
Abstract
Soil habitat quality is an important indicator of environmental health. New Zealand soils are in critical condition because of various land-use practices, such as intensification of agriculture and urban growth, causing increased erosion and loss of fertile soil. Soil consists of organic (carbon-rich, microbe-laden detritus) and inorganic (weathered rock particles, minerals, water, air) components that are vital for sustaining flora and fauna, including humans. Soil in and of itself is alive with various forms of biota. Soil conservation takes an anthropocentric, utilitarian approach to policy and planning, whereas soil preservation takes an ecocentric or nature-centred approach. When the catchment boards of the earlier eras [governed by the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941 (NZ)] were decommissioned to make way for regional councils around the time when the Resource Management Act 1991 (NZ) came into force, the soil scientific expertise was largely lost. At the same time, soil quality in New Zealand has been deteriorating ever since. In this paper, I argue for the establishment of community-based soil conservancies and conservancy officers and, ultimately, the legal endowment of personhood on soil in order for kaitiaki oneone (soil guardians) to be appointed. These measures will assist in the protection of soils, which will lead to better outcomes for the environment and generations to come.
Keywords: conservancies, environmental legislation, integrated resource management, New Zealand, personhood, policy and planning, preservation, soil conservation.
References
Amuri Irrigation Company (2022) Our infrastructure. Available at https://www.amuriirrigation.nz/infrastructureArnstein, SR (2019). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 85, 24–34.
| A ladder of citizen participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Auckland Council (1999) Auckland Regional Policy Statement: Chapter 12: Soil conservation. Available at http://www.aucklandcity.govt.nz/council/documents/regionalplans/aucklandcouncilregionalpolicystatement/ACRPS%20Chapter%2012.pdf
Booth P, Kalaugher E, Stevenson B, Harmsworth G, Kannemeyer R (2019) Soil health and resilience: oneone ora, tangata ora. Stakeholder survey report. Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand. Available at https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/assets/Discover-Our-Research/Land/Soil-resilence/Soil_health_survey_report-v2.pdf
Braden J (1991) Policies for soil conservation in New Zealand: options for government. Centre for Resource Management Information Paper No. 31. Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand. Available at https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10182/1207/crm_ip_31.pdf
Castree, N (2010a). Neoliberalism and the biophysical environment 1: What ‘neoliberalism’ is, and what difference nature makes to it. Geography Compass 4, 1725–1733.
| Neoliberalism and the biophysical environment 1: What ‘neoliberalism’ is, and what difference nature makes to it.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Castree, N (2010b). Neoliberalism and the biophysical environment 2: Theorising the neoliberalisation of nature. Geography Compass 4, 1734–1746.
| Neoliberalism and the biophysical environment 2: Theorising the neoliberalisation of nature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Collins A, Mackay A, Hill R, Thomas S, Dyck B, Payn T, Stokes S (2015) Future requirements for soil management in New Zealand: Phase 3: Looking forward. National Land Resource Centre, Palmerston North. Available at https://mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/10400-future-requirements-for-soil-management-in-new-zealand
Ericksen NJ, Berke PR, Crawford JL, Dixon JE (2017) ‘Plan-making for sustainability: The New Zealand experience.’ (Routledge: London) https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315246741
Fromherz, NA (2012). The case for a global treaty on soil conservation, sustainable farming, and the preservation of agrarian culture. Ecology Law Quarterly 39, 57–121.
Gómez-Baggethun, E, and Naredo, JM (2015). In search of lost time: the rise and fall of limits to growth in international sustainability policy. Sustainability Science 10, 385–395.
| In search of lost time: the rise and fall of limits to growth in international sustainability policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goudie A (1990) ‘The nature of the environment,’ 2nd edn. (Blackwell: Oxford)
Greater Wellington Regional Council (2015) Section 32 report: Soil conservation for the Proposed Natural Resources Plan for the Wellington Region. Greater Wellington Regional Council, Wellington, New Zealand. Available at https://archive.gw.govt.nz/assets/Plans--Publications/Regional-Plan-Review/Proposed-Plan/Section-32-report-Soil-conservation.PDF
Gregg P (2008) Soil erosion and conservation: legislation and catchment boards: 1940s−1950s. Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Available at http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/soil-erosion-and-conservation/page-5
Grinlinton DP, Palmer KA (2008) Integrating sustainability into water and soil conservation – the New Zealand model [Paper presentation]. In ‘15th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference, Budapest, Hungary.’ (USDA Agricultural Research Service: Tucson, AZ) Available at http://tucson.ars.ag.gov/isco/isco15/pdf/Grinlinton%20D_Integrating%20sustainability%20into.pdf
Hagman, W, Andersson, D, Västfjäll, D, and Tinghög, G (2015). Public views on policies involving nudges. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6, 439–453.
| Public views on policies involving nudges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hicks DH, Anthony T (Eds) (2001) ‘Soil conservation technical handbook: part a: principles.’ (Ministry for the Environment: Wellington). Available at https://nzarm.org.nz/vdb/document/26
Hunt, L, Rosin, C, Campbell, H, and Fairweather, J (2013). The impact of neoliberalism on New Zealand farmers: changing what it means to be a ‘good farmer’. Extension Farming Systems Journal 9, 34–42.
Hutchison, A (2014). The Whanganui River as a legal person. Alternative Law Journal 39, 179–182.
| The Whanganui River as a legal person.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ireland, E (2021). Reframing the relationship between people, nature and authority: The Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017. Lincoln Planning Review 11, 73–83.
Jackson, T (2019). The Post-growth challenge: Secular stagnation, inequality and the limits to growth. Ecological Economics 156, 236–246.
| The Post-growth challenge: Secular stagnation, inequality and the limits to growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knight C (2018) ‘Beyond Manapouri: 50 years of environmental politics in New Zealand.’ (Canterbury University Press: Christchurch). Available at http://www.nationwidebooks.co.nz/product/beyond-manapouri-9781988503042
Kramm, M (2020). When a river becomes a person. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 21, 307–319.
| When a river becomes a person.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lilburne, LR, Hewitt, AE, Sparling, GP, and Selvarajah, N (2002). Soil quality in New Zealand: policy and the science response. Journal of Environmental Quality 31, 1768–1773.
| Soil quality in New Zealand: policy and the science response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Liverman, DM, and Vilas, S (2006). Neoliberalism and the environment in Latin America. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31, 327–363.
| Neoliberalism and the environment in Latin America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lynn IH, Manderson AK, Page MJ, Harmsworth GR, Eyles GO, Douglas GB, Mackay AD, Newsome PJF (2009) ‘Land use capability survey handbook: A New Zealand handbook for the classification of land,’ 3rd edn. (AgResearch: Hamilton; Landcare Research: Lincoln; GNS Science: Lower Hutt). https://doi.org/10.7931/DL1MG6
Lyver, PO’B, Ruru, J, Scott, N, Tylianakis, JM, Arnold, J, Malinen, SK, Bataille, CY, Herse, MR, Jones, CJ, Gormley, AM, Peltzer, DA, Taura, Y, Timoti, P, Stone, C, Wilcox, M, and Moller, H (2019). Building biocultural approaches into Aotearoa – New Zealand’s conservation future. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 49, 394–411.
| Building biocultural approaches into Aotearoa – New Zealand’s conservation future.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin, A, Coolsaet, B, Corbera, E, Dawson, NM, Fraser, JA, Lehmann, I, and Rodriguez, I (2016). Justice and conservation: the need to incorporate recognition. Biological Conservation 197, 254–261.
| Justice and conservation: the need to incorporate recognition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mather, AS (1982). The changing perception of soil erosion in New Zealand. The Geographical Journal 148, 207–218.
| The changing perception of soil erosion in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meyer VW (2011) ‘Game Ranger’s Diary: Activities and observations of a ranger in the African wilderness.’ (VDM Verlag: Saarbrücken). https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4259.3608
Ministry for the Environment (2021) Acts and regulations. Available at https://environment.govt.nz/acts-and-regulations/
Ministry for the Environment (2022) Resource management reform: The Natural and Built Environment Act. Available at https://environment.govt.nz/publications/resource-management-reform-the-natural-and-built-environment-act/
Ministry of Works (1971) ‘Land use capability survey handbook: A New Zealand handbook for the classification of land.’ (New Zealand Government: Wellington)
Minor MA, Robertson AW (2006) Soil bugs: An illustrated guide to New Zealand soil invertebrates. Updated 20 October 2021. Available at http://soilbugs.massey.ac.nz
Minor MA, Meyer VW, Robertson AW, Taiti S (2016) NZ slaters: A guide and identification key to New Zealand terrestrial Isopoda. Updated 2 August 2019. Available at http://nzslaters.massey.ac.nz
Myers N (Ed.) (1987) ‘The Gaia atlas of planet management.’ (Pan Books: London)
Newsome, D, and Ladd, P (2022). The dimensions of geotourism with a spotlight on geodiversity in a subdued landscape. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks 10, 351–366.
| The dimensions of geotourism with a spotlight on geodiversity in a subdued landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Newsome, D, Ladd, P, and Dowling, R (2022). The scope for geotourism based on regolith in southwestern Australia – a theoretical and practical perspective. Geoheritage 14, 1–21.
| The scope for geotourism based on regolith in southwestern Australia – a theoretical and practical perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
New Zealand Government (1941) ‘Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941.’ (Parliamentary Counsel Office: Wellington)
New Zealand Government (1991) ‘Resource Management Act 1991.’ (Parliamentary Counsel Office: Wellington)
New Zealand Government (2002) ‘Local Government Act 2002.’ (Parliamentary Counsel Office: Wellington)
New Zealand Government (2014) ‘Te Urewera Act 2014.’ (Parliamentary Counsel Office: Wellington)
New Zealand Government (2017) ‘Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017.’ (Parliamentary Counsel Office: Wellington)
Odum EP (1971) ‘Fundamentals of ecology,’ 3rd edn. (Saunders College Publishing: Philadelphia)
Phillips C, Basher L, Spiekermann R (2020) Biophysical performance of erosion and sediment control techniques in New Zealand: a review. Landcare Research, Lincoln. Available at https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/assets/Events/Remote-sensing/2022/RA1.2_Review_final_2020_LC3761.pdf
Roberts, M, Norman, W, Minhinnick, N, Wihongi, D, and Kirkwood, C (1995). Kaitiakitanga: Maori perspectives on conservation. Pacific Conservation Biology 2, 7–20.
| Kaitiakitanga: Maori perspectives on conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Säynäjoki, E-S, Heinonen, J, and Junnila, S (2014). The power of urban planning on environmental sustainability: a focus group study in Finland. Sustainability 6, 6622–6643.
| The power of urban planning on environmental sustainability: a focus group study in Finland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Steg, L (2016). Values, norms, and intrinsic motivation to act proenvironmentally. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41, 277–292.
| Values, norms, and intrinsic motivation to act proenvironmentally.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Gestel, LC, Adriaanse, MA, and de Ridder, DTD (2021). Who accepts nudges? Nudge acceptability from a self-regulation perspective. PLoS ONE 16, .
| Who accepts nudges? Nudge acceptability from a self-regulation perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waitaki Whitestone Geopark Trust (2022) Waitaki Whitestone Geopark proposed to be NZ’s first UNESCO Global Geopark. Available at https://www.whitestonegeopark.nz/post/waitaki-whitestone-geopark-proposed-to-be-nz-s-first-unesco-global-geopark
Walker, ET, Wehi, PM, Nelson, NJ, Beggs, JR, and Whaanga, H (2019). Kaitiakitanga, place and the urban restoration agenda. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 43, 1–8.
| Kaitiakitanga, place and the urban restoration agenda.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilcox D (1994) The guide to effective participation. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York. Available at http://ourmuseum.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/The-Guide-to-Effective-Participation.pdf
