Using high-definition aerial photography to search in 3D for malleefowl mounds is a cost-effective alternative to ground searches
Scott Thompson A , Graham Thompson A D , Jessica Sackmann B , Julia Spark C and Tristan Brown CA Terrestrial Ecosystems, 10 Houston Place, Mt Claremont, WA 6010, Australia.
B Mount Gibson Iron Ltd, 1/2 Kings Park Road, West Perth, WA 6005, Australia.
C Aerometrex, 59 King William Street, Kent Town, SA 5067, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: graham@terrestrialecosystems.com
Pacific Conservation Biology 21(3) 208-213 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC14919
Submitted: 17 March 2015 Accepted: 21 June 2015 Published: 24 July 2015
Abstract
The threatened malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata) constructs a large (often >3 m) incubator mound (nest) that is considered a useful proxy for surveying its presence and abundance in the context of an environmental impact assessment. Here we report on the effectiveness and relative cost of using high-definition aerial photography to search in 3D for malleefowl mounds by comparing results to those of earlier ground-based searches. High-definition colour aerial photography was taken of an area of ~7014 ha and searched in 3D for malleefowl mounds. All 24 active (i.e. in use) malleefowl mounds known before the examination of aerial photography were detected using the new assessment technique. Of the 108 total mounds (active and inactive) known from earlier on-ground surveys, 94 (87%) were recorded using the new technique. Mounds not detected were all old and weathered, many barely above ground level and some with vegetation growing in the crater. Approximately 6.3% of the identifications considered ‘confident’ and ~35.0% considered ‘potential’ based on the aerial photography proved to be false positives. The cost of detecting malleefowl mounds using the interpretation of high-definition 3D colour aerial photography and then subsequently examining these areas on the ground is appreciably cheaper than on-ground grid searches.
References
Bennett Environmental Consulting (2000). Flora and vegetation of Mt Gibson. Unpublished report for Mt Gibson Iron Ltd, Perth.Benshemesh, J. (2007). National recovery plan for malleefowl. Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia.
Benshemesh, J. S., and Emison, W. B. (1996). Surveying breeding densities of malleefowl using an airborne thermal scanner. Wildlife Research 23, 121–141.
| Surveying breeding densities of malleefowl using an airborne thermal scanner.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brickhill, J. (1985). An aerial survey of nests of malleefowl Leipoa ocellata Gould (Megapodiidae) in central New South Wales. Australian Wildlife Research 12, 257–261.
Copley, P., and Williams, S. (1995). Distribution, relative abundance and conservation of malleefowl in South Australia. In ‘Working Papers of the National Malleefowl Forum’, pp. 9–32. (Working Papers of the National Malleefowl Forum: Adelaide, SA.)
Department of Sustainability Environment Water Population and Communities (2010). Survey guidelines for Australia’s threatened birds. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Populations and Communities, Canberra.
ATA Environmental (2005). Malleefowl assessment, Mount Gibson. Unpublished report for Mt Gibson Mining Limited, Perth.
Frith, H. J. (1956). Temperature regulation in the nesting mounds of the mallee-fowl, Leipoa ocellata Gould. Wildlife Research 1, 79–95.
| Temperature regulation in the nesting mounds of the mallee-fowl, Leipoa ocellata Gould.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frith, H. J. (1959). Breeding of the mallee fowl, Leipoa ocellata Gould (Megapodiidae). CSIRO Wildlife Research 4, 31–60.
| Breeding of the mallee fowl, Leipoa ocellata Gould (Megapodiidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frith, H. J. (1962a). Conservation of the mallee fowl, Leipoa ocellata Gould (Megapodiidae). CSIRO Wildlife Research 7, 33–45.
| Conservation of the mallee fowl, Leipoa ocellata Gould (Megapodiidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frith, H. J. (1962b). ‘The Mallee Fowl.’ (Angus and Robertson: Sydney.)
Hopkins, L. (undated). ‘National Manual for the Malleefowl Monitoring System.’ (National Heritage Trust: Canberra.)
Jones, D., and Goth, A. (2008). ‘Mound-builders.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Mount Gibson Mining Ltd and Extension Hill Pty Ltd (2013). Extension Hill and Extension Hill North Malleefowl Management Plan. Unpublished report of Mount Gibson Mining Ltd and Extension Hill Pty Ltd.
Parsons, B. C., Short, J. C., and Roberts, J. D. (2008). Contraction in the range of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata) in Western Australia: a comparative assessment using presence-only and presence–absence datasets. Emu 108, 221–231.
| Contraction in the range of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata) in Western Australia: a comparative assessment using presence-only and presence–absence datasets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Priddel, D., and Wheeler, R. (1996). Effect of age at release on the susceptibility of captive-reared malleefowl Leipoa ocellata to predation by the introduced fox Vulpes vulpes. Emu 96, 32–41.
| Effect of age at release on the susceptibility of captive-reared malleefowl Leipoa ocellata to predation by the introduced fox Vulpes vulpes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Priddel, D., and Wheeler, R. (2003). Nesting activity and demography of an isolated population of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata). Wildlife Research 30, 451–464.
| Nesting activity and demography of an isolated population of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Priddel, D., and Wheeler, R. (2005). Fecundity, egg size and the influence of rainfall in an isolated population of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata). Wildlife Research 32, 639–648.
| Fecundity, egg size and the influence of rainfall in an isolated population of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Priddel, D., Wheeler, R., and Copley, P. (2007). Does the integrity or structure of mallee habitat influence the degree of fox predation on malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata). Emu 107, 100–107.
| Does the integrity or structure of mallee habitat influence the degree of fox predation on malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Read, J., Moseby, K., and Lander, M. (2014). The relative efficacy of ground searches, aerial surveys and LiDAR technology for detecting malleefowl mounds. In ‘Fifth National Malleefowl Forum.’ (National Malleefowl Recovery Team: Dubbo, NSW.)
Thompson, S. A., and Thompson, G. G. (2008). Searching and monitoring for malleefowl; ground, aerial and thermal surveys. In ‘Goldfields Environmental Management Group Workshop 2008, Kalgoorlie’. pp. 17–28. (Goldfields Environmental Management Group.)
Woinarski, J. C. Z. (1989). The vertebrate fauna of broombush Melaleuca uncinata vegetation in north-western Victoria, with reference to effects of broombush harvesting. Australian Wildlife Research 16, 217–238.
| The vertebrate fauna of broombush Melaleuca uncinata vegetation in north-western Victoria, with reference to effects of broombush harvesting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
