Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Foraging preferences of Swift Parrots on Tasmanian Blue-gum: tree size, flowering frequency and flowering intensity

Raymond Brereton A , Stephen A. Mallick B D and Simon J. Kennedy C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Forest Practices Unit, Patrick Street, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.

B Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, 134 Macquarie Street, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.

C Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Bendigo, Vic. 3550, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: stephen.mallick@dpiwe.tas.gov.au

Emu 104(4) 377-383 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU03045
Submitted: 11 September 2003  Accepted: 3 May 2004   Published: 16 December 2004

Abstract

The Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor), is a migratory species that forages primarily on Blue-gum (Eucalyptus globulus) during its Tasmanian breeding season. We investigated the foraging preferences of Swift Parrots for Blue-gum trees of different sizes and the effect of tree size on flowering frequency and flowering intensity over three seasons (1998, 1999, 2001). Swift Parrots showed a clear preference for larger Blue-gum trees: Blue-gum trees in which Swift Parrots foraged were ~40% larger than surrounding (non-forage) trees, while the size-class distribution of forage trees was significantly skewed towards larger tree-size compared with surrounding non-forage trees. The mean flowering intensity of forage trees was also significantly greater than the mean flowering intensity of non-forage trees. Both flowering frequency and flowering intensity increased with tree size, although there was a trend for both flowering frequency and intensity to decline in the largest tree size-classes. Past clearing has resulted in the loss of over 50% of the original (pre-European) grassy Blue-gum forest in Tasmania. Remnant grassy Blue-gum forest as well as artificially planted Blue-gum trees typically occur in small patches of <1 ha, including many solitary and scattered trees in pasture, parkland and gardens. These isolated patches of Blue-gum frequently include trees of large stature, making them an important food resource for the endangered Swift Parrot.


Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust and administered by the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. Peter Brown provided comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. P. Tilyard and B. Potts (Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Production Forestry, School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania) provided data on Blue-gum flowering in south-eastern Tasmania.


References

Brereton R. (1996). The Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor in south-east Tasmania: conservation research statement. Report to the Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Endangered Species Program, Canberra.

Brereton R. (1997). Management prescriptions for the Swift Parrot in production forests. Report to the RFA Environment and Heritage Technical Committee, Hobart.

Brereton R. (1999). Swift Parrot Recovery Plan 1997–2000. Department of Primary Industries Water and Environment, Hobart.

Brown P. B. (1989). The Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor: a report on its ecology, distribution and status, including management considerations. Report to the Department of Lands Parks and Wildlife, Tasmania.

Crowley, G. M. , and Garnett, S. T. (2001). Food value and tree selection by Glossy Black-Cockatoos Calyptorhynchus lathami. Austral Ecology 26, 116–126.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kennedy S. J. (1998). Foraging ecology of the Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor) in the Box–Ironbark region of Victoria. B.Sc.(Honours) Thesis, University of Ballarat, Victoria.

Kennedy, S. J. , and Overs, A. E. (2001). Foraging ecology and habitat use of the Swift Parrot on the south-western slopes of New South Wales. Corella 25, 68–74.
Swift Parrot Recovery Team (2001). Swift Parrot Recovery Plan. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart.

Wilson, J. , and Bennett, A. F. (1999). Patchiness of a floral resource: flowering of Red Ironbark Eucalyptus tricarpa in a box and ironbark forest. Victorian Naturalist 116, 48–53.