Using river-scale experiments to inform variable releases from large dams: a case study of emergent adaptive management
R. J. Watts A , D. S. Ryder B , C. Allan A and S. Commens CA Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
B School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C River Murray Division, Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: rwatts@csu.edu.au
Marine and Freshwater Research 61(7) 786-797 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09190
Submitted: 24 July 2009 Accepted: 10 December 2009 Published: 23 July 2010
Abstract
Case studies of successful adaptive management generally focus on examples that have frameworks for adaptive management embedded from project conception. In contrast, this paper outlines an example of emergent adaptive management. We describe an approach whereby targeted research and collaboration among stakeholders assisted learning, and ultimately the development of interim operational guidelines for increased within-channel flow variability in the highly regulated Mitta Mitta River, which is managed as part of the River Murray System in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Environmental monitoring of four variable flow trials evaluated the response of water column microbial activity, benthic and water column metabolism, the structure and composition of algal biofilms, and benthic macroinvertebrates to increased flow variability created by varying the release from Dartmouth Reservoir. Each trial built upon lessons from previous trials, with collaboration among key stakeholders occurring before, during and after each trial. Institutional conditions encouraged a shift to adaptive management over time that helped to achieve environmental, social and economic objectives downstream of the dam. A key lesson is that adaptive management does not have to be specified a priori, but can emerge within a trusting relationship between stakeholders as long as they are willing and able to change their operational paradigm.
Keywords: dam re-operation, Dartmouth Dam, environment, flow restoration, flow variability, Mitta Mitta River, progressive learning, river regulation.
Acknowledgements
The research discussed in this paper was enabled by several people whose enthusiasm and skills have supported the trials since 2001 to the present. In particular, Trevor Jacobs, Bruce Campbell, Neville Garland and Damian Green (Murray–Darling Basin Authority) and Peter Liepkalns (Goulburn Murray Water, Dartmouth Dam) have been key personnel in operational planning and implementation, and Mac Paton, a local landholder has facilitated local information exchange. In addition, several staff and students of Charles Sturt University contributed to the monitoring of the flow trials. Thanks to the editor, two anonymous reviewers and Trevor Jacobs for their constructive comments on drafts of this manuscript.
Allan, C. , and Curtis, A. (2005). Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environmental Management 36, 414–425.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Allison, S. D. , and Vitousek, P. M. (2004). Extracellular enzyme activities and carbon chemistry as drivers of tropical plant litter decomposition. Biotropica 36, 285–296.
Biggs, B. J. F. , and Thomson, H. A. (1995). Disturbance of stream periphyton by perturbations in shear stress: time to community failure and differences in community resistance. Journal of Phycology 31, 233–241.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Broderick, K. (2008). Adaptive management for water quality improvement in the Great Barrier Reef catchments: Learning on the edge. Geographical Research 46, 303–313.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doeg, T. J. (1984). Response of the macroinvertebrate fauna of the Mitta Mitta River, Victoria, to the construction and operation of Dartmouth Dam. 2. Irrigation release. Occasional Papers from the Museum of Victoria 1, 101–127.
Eberhard, R. , Robinson, C. J. , Waterhouse, J. , Parslow, J. , and Hart, B. , et al. (2009). Adaptive management for water quality planning – from theory to practice. Marine and Freshwater Research 60, 1189–1195.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Growns, I. O. , and Growns, J. E. (2001). Ecological effects of flow regulation on macroinvertebrate and periphytic diatom assemblages in the Hawkesbury-Nepean River, Australia. River Research and Applications 17, 275–293.
Hancock, P. J. , and Boulton, A. J. (2005). The effects of an environmental flow release on water quality in the hyporheic zone of the Hunter River, Australia. Hydrobiologia 552, 75–85.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Hondzo, M. , and Wang, H. (2002). Effects of turbulence on growth and metabolism of periphyton in a laboratory flume. Water Resources Research 38, 1277–1286.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ison, R. , Rölling, N. , and Watson, D. (2007). Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environmental Science & Policy 10, 499–511.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ladson, A. R. , White, L. J. , Doolan, J. A. , Finlayson, B. L. , and Hart, B. T. , et al. (1999). Development and testing of an Index of Stream Condition for waterway management in Australia. Freshwater Biology 41, 453–468.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McLain, R. J. , and Lee, R. G. (1996). Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management 20, 437–448.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Mosisch, T. D. , and Bunn, S. E. (1997). Temporal patterns of rainforest stream epilithic algae in relation to flow-mediated disturbance. Aquatic Botany 58, 181–193.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007b). Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resources Management 21, 49–62.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Poff, N. L. , Allan, J. D. , Bain, M. B. , Karr, J. R. , and Prestegaard, K. L. , et al. (1997). The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47, 769–784.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Raadgever, G. T. , Mostert, E. , Kranz, N. , Interwies, E. , and Timmerman, J. G. (2008). Assessing management regimes in transboundary river basins: do they support adaptive management? Ecology and Society 13, 1–21.
Rivers-Moore, N. A. , and Jewitt, G. P. W. (2007). Adaptive management and water temperature variability within a South African river system: What are the management options? Journal of Environmental Management 82, 39–50.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Ryder, D. S. , Watts, R. J. , Nye, E. , and Burns, A. (2006). Can flow velocity regulate biofilm structure in a regulated lowland river? Marine and Freshwater Research 57, 29–35.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sinsabaugh, R. L. , Findlay, S. , Franchini, P. , and Fischer, D. (1997). Enzymatic analysis of riverine bacterioplankton production. Limnology and Oceanography 42, 29–38.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Tank, J. L. , Webster, J. R. , Benfield, E. F. , and Sinsabaugh, R. L. (1998). Effect of leaf litter exclusion on microbial enzyme activity associated with wood biofilms in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 17, 95–103.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Uehlinger, U. (2000). Resistance and resilience of ecosystem metabolism in a flood-prone river system. Freshwater Biology 45, 319–332.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zander, A. , Bishop, A. G. , Prenzler, P. D. , and Ryder, D. S. (2007). Allochthonous DOC in floodplain rivers: identifying sources using solid phase microextraction with gas chromatography. Aquatic Sciences: Research Across Boundaries 69, 472–483.
| CAS |
1 Prior to 15 December 2008 this organisation was the ‘Murray–Darling Basin Commission’ (MDBC). Reference to the organisation ‘MDBA’ throughout this paper may mean MDBC or MDBA.