A novel push trap element to manage carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): a laboratory trial
L. A. Thwaites A C , B. B. Smith A , M. Decelis B , D. Fleer A and A. Conallin A BA Invasive Species Sub-Program, South Australian Research and Development Institute – Aquatic Sciences, West Beach, SA 5024, Australia.
B School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: leigh.thwaites@sa.gov.au
Marine and Freshwater Research 61(1) 42-48 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09011
Submitted: 20 January 2009 Accepted: 3 June 2009 Published: 29 January 2010
Abstract
Common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) cause detrimental changes to aquatic ecosystems and are a declared pest fish in several countries. Despite existing management options, the development of new technologies is desirable as the range of the common carp is predicted to expand and their eventual control will rely on an integrated approach. The present paper describes a laboratory trial of a novel ‘finger style’ push trap element designed to catch carp ≥250 mm total length (TL). Forty-five adult carp (mean length: 603.0 ± 74.9 mm s.d. TL) were placed into the downstream section of a 7.25-m flume and exposed to three stimuli (water level manipulation, flow and light) to encourage upstream movement towards the push trap element. Forty-one carp (91.1%) pushed through the trap element over 16 h and none escaped. Only an average of ~5% of carp’s known pushing capacity was needed to push through the ‘fingers’ and enter the trap, and modelling suggested that a 250-mm TL carp would need to exert ~22% of its pushing capacity. The results confirm that the push trap element design is matched to the morphology and ecology of carp and, pending field validation trials, promises success as a novel management option.
Additional keywords: Australia, cage, carp exclusion screen, fishway, migration, wetland.
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous referees for providing constructive comments on the original manuscript. This work was carried out under a SARDI Aquatic Sciences exemption to section 115 of the Fisheries Management Act 2007 and a University of Adelaide Animal Ethics permit (number S-063-2006). The study was funded by the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre and the Murray-Darling Basin Authority.
Brown, P. , and Walker, P. (2004). CARPSIM: stochastic simulation modelling of wild carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) population dynamics, with applications to pest control. Ecological Modelling 176, 83–97.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Close, B. , Banister, K. , Baumans, V. , Bernoth, E. , and Bromage, N. , et al. (1997). Recommendations for euthanasia of experimental animals: part 2. Laboratory Animals 31, 1–32.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Johnsen, P. B. , and Hasler, A. D. (1977). Winter aggregations of carp (Cyprinus carpio) as revealed by ultrasonic tracking. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 106, 556–559.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matsuzaki, S. S. , Usio, N. , Takamura, N. , and Washitani, I. (2009). Contrasting impacts of invasive engineers on freshwater ecosystems: an experiment and meta-analysis. Oecologia 158, 673–686.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Shields, J. T. (1958). Experimental control of carp reproduction through water drawdowns in Fort Randall Reservoir, South Dakota. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 87, 23–32.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thresher, R. E. (2008). Autocidal technology for the control of invasive fish. Fisheries 33, 114–120.
Verrill, D. D. , and Berry, C. R. (1995). Effectiveness of an electrical barrier and lake drawdown for reducing common carp and bigmouth buffalo abundances. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 15, 137–141.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yamamoto, T. , Kohmatsu, Y. , and Yuma, M. (2006). Effects of summer drawdown on cyprinid fish larvae in Lake Biwa, Japan. Limnology 7, 75–82.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |