Flowing water decreases hydrodynamic signal detection in a fish with an epidermal lateral-line system
Daniel K. Bassett A B , Alexander G. Carton A and John C. Montgomery AA Leigh Marine Laboratory, PO Box 349, Warkworth, New Zealand.
B Corresponding author. Email: dk.bassett@auckland.ac.nz
Marine and Freshwater Research 57(6) 611-617 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF05193
Submitted: 22 September 2005 Accepted: 26 June 2006 Published: 15 August 2006
Abstract
The lateral-line system of the common bully, Gobiomorphus cotidianus, is unusual in that it possesses an extensive array of superficial neuromasts. Fish were trained to orientate to a small vibrating bead (50 Hz). By manipulating the amplitude of vibration to determine the threshold level for the behaviour, the hydrodynamic detection capabilities of the common bully were characterised in both still- and flowing-water. In still water, the common bully attained a detection threshold (calculated as the amplitude of water particle displacement at the snout) of 3.3 × 10−5 cm at 50 Hz. Successive elevations in the background flow caused a 10-fold decrease in detection sensitivity. At a background flow of 4.5 cm s–1 the detection threshold increased to 3 × 10−4 cm. These findings demonstrate that a lateral-line system that lacks sub-surface canal neuromasts is most sensitive in still-water conditions (low-noise). However, this system is compromised under flowing-water conditions such that sensitivity is reduced at current velocities >1.5 cm s–1.
Extra keywords: background flow, detection response, epidermal lateral line, sensitivity.
Bleckmann, H. (1980). Reaction time and stimulus frequency in prey localization in the surface-feeding fish Aplocheilus lineatus. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 140, 163–172.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coombs, S. , and Janssen, J. (1990). Behavioral and neurophysiological assessment of lateral line sensitivity in the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 167, 557–567.
| PubMed |
Dijkgraaf, S. (1963). The functioning and significance of the lateral-line organs. Biological Reviews 38, 51–105.
| PubMed |
Hayes, J. W. , and Rutledge, M. J. (1991). Relationship between turbidity and fish diets in Lakes Waahi and Whangape, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 25, 297–304.
Kanter, M. , and Coombs, S. (2003). Lateral-line mediated rheotaxis and prey detection in uniform currents by Lake Michigan mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi). The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 59–70.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Miller, P. J. (1980). The osteology and adaptive features of Rhyacicthys aspro (Teleostei: Gobioidei) and the classification of gobioid fishes. Journal of Zoology 171, 397–434.
Montgomery, J. C. , and Bodznick, D. (1994). An adaptive filter that cancels self-induced noise in the electrosensory and lateral line mechanosensory systems of fish. Neuroscience Letters 174, 145–148.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |