Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Flowing water decreases hydrodynamic signal detection in a fish with an epidermal lateral-line system

Daniel K. Bassett A B , Alexander G. Carton A and John C. Montgomery A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Leigh Marine Laboratory, PO Box 349, Warkworth, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email: dk.bassett@auckland.ac.nz

Marine and Freshwater Research 57(6) 611-617 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF05193
Submitted: 22 September 2005  Accepted: 26 June 2006   Published: 15 August 2006

Abstract

The lateral-line system of the common bully, Gobiomorphus cotidianus, is unusual in that it possesses an extensive array of superficial neuromasts. Fish were trained to orientate to a small vibrating bead (50 Hz). By manipulating the amplitude of vibration to determine the threshold level for the behaviour, the hydrodynamic detection capabilities of the common bully were characterised in both still- and flowing-water. In still water, the common bully attained a detection threshold (calculated as the amplitude of water particle displacement at the snout) of 3.3 × 10−5 cm at 50 Hz. Successive elevations in the background flow caused a 10-fold decrease in detection sensitivity. At a background flow of 4.5 cm s–1 the detection threshold increased to 3 × 10−4 cm. These findings demonstrate that a lateral-line system that lacks sub-surface canal neuromasts is most sensitive in still-water conditions (low-noise). However, this system is compromised under flowing-water conditions such that sensitivity is reduced at current velocities >1.5 cm s–1.

Extra keywords: background flow, detection response, epidermal lateral line, sensitivity.


References

Bleckmann, H. (1980). Reaction time and stimulus frequency in prey localization in the surface-feeding fish Aplocheilus lineatus. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 140, 163–172.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Coombs S., and Janssen J. (1989). Peripheral processing by the lateral line system of the mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi). In ‘The Mechanosensory Lateral Line: Neurobiology and Evolution’. (Eds S. Coombs, P. Gorner and H. Munz.) pp. 299–319. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Coombs, S. , and Janssen, J. (1990). Behavioral and neurophysiological assessment of lateral line sensitivity in the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 167, 557–567.
PubMed | Coombs S., Janssen J., and Webb J. F. (1988). Diversity of lateral line systems: evolutionary and functional considerations. In ‘Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals’. (Eds J. Atema, R. R. Fay, A. N. Popper and W. N. Tavolga.) pp. 553–595. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Coombs S., Janssen J., and Montgomery J. C. (1992). Functional and evolutionary implications of peripheral diversity in lateral line systems. In ‘The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing’. (Eds D. B. Webster, R. R. Fayand and A. N. Popper.) pp. 267–294. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Denton E. R., and Gray A. B. (1988). Mechanical factors in the excitation of the lateral lines of fishes. In ‘Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals’. (Eds J. Atema, R. R. Fay, A. N. Popper and W. N. Tavolga.) pp. 595–617. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Dijkgraaf, S. (1963). The functioning and significance of the lateral-line organs. Biological Reviews 38, 51–105.
PubMed | Hassan E. S. (1989). Hydrodynamic imaging of the surroundings by the lateral line of the blind cave fish Anoptichthys jordani. In ‘The Mechanosensory Lateral Line: Neurobiology and Evolution’. (Eds S. Coombs, P. Gorner and H. Munz.) pp. 217–228. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Hayes, J. W. , and Rutledge, M. J. (1991). Relationship between turbidity and fish diets in Lakes Waahi and Whangape, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 25, 297–304.
Kalmijn A. D. J. (1988). Hydrodynamic and acoustic field detection. In ‘Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals’. (Eds J. Atema, R. R. Fay, A. N. Popper and W. N. Tavolga.) pp. 83–130. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Kanter, M. , and Coombs, S. (2003). Lateral-line mediated rheotaxis and prey detection in uniform currents by Lake Michigan mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi). The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 59–70.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | McDowall R. M. (1990). ‘New Zealand Freshwater Fishes: A Natural History and Guide.’ (Heinemann Reed: Auckland.)

Miller, P. J. (1980). The osteology and adaptive features of Rhyacicthys aspro (Teleostei: Gobioidei) and the classification of gobioid fishes. Journal of Zoology 171, 397–434.
Miller P. J. (1986). Gobiidae. In ‘Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean’. (Eds P. J. P. Whitehead, M. L. Bauchot, J. C. Hureau, J. Nielsen and E. Tortonese.) pp. 1019–1085. (UNESCO: Paris.)

Montgomery, J. C. , and Bodznick, D. (1994). An adaptive filter that cancels self-induced noise in the electrosensory and lateral line mechanosensory systems of fish. Neuroscience Letters 174, 145–148.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Zar J. (1999). ‘Biostatistical Analysis.’ (Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.)