Subtidal assemblages associated with a geotextile reef in south-east Queensland, Australia
Rhys A. Edwards A B and Stephen D. A. Smith AA School of Environmental Science and Natural Resources Management, University of New England, National Marine Science Centre, PO Box J321, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: redwards@nmsc.edu.au
Marine and Freshwater Research 56(2) 133-142 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04202
Submitted: 29 July 2004 Accepted: 1 March 2005 Published: 12 April 2005
Abstract
In marine habitats, the use of geotextile materials as a ‘soft-engineering’ solution is increasingly being considered as an alternative to hard structures. However, very little is known about biological assemblages that develop on geotextile structures. This study provides the first ecological comparison of subtidal assemblages between Narrowneck Artificial Reef (NAR), a geotextile reef in south-east Queensland, Australia, and three nearby natural reefs. Benthic community structure, fish assemblages and habitat complexity were compared between reef types using an asymmetrical design. Although natural reefs supported distinct biotic assemblages, as a class, these reefs differed significantly from NAR. The artificial reef was dominated by macroalgae and supported fewer benthic categories, whereas the natural reefs were characterised by a diverse range of sessile invertebrates. Benthic and demersal fish assemblages were less diverse on NAR, but pelagic fish assemblages were similar on both reef types. The substratum of NAR was less complex than that of the natural reefs; this physical variable was correlated with some of the differences in benthic communities and benthic and demersal fish assemblages. It is likely that the key determinants of the biotic patterns observed in this study are interactions between the age of NAR and the physical properties of geotextile substratum.
Extra keywords: artificial reefs, benthic invertebrates, complexity, fish assemblages, geotextiles.
Acknowledgments
Soil Filters Australia, Pty Ltd (Qld.) provided the majority of funding for this project. Thanks to the Artificial Reef Team (Andrew Carroll, Matt Harrison and Michael Rule) for their assistance with fieldwork at the Gold Coast and to the other postgraduate students and staff at the National Marine Science Centre who offered assistance at the various stages of the study. Kathryn James produced Fig. 1; Fig. 2 provided courtesy of Soil Filters Australia, Pty Ltd. This work formed part of a B.Sc. (Hons) project by the first author.
Abelson, A. , and Shlesinger, Y. (2002). Comparison of the development of coral and fish communities on rock-aggregated artificial reefs at Eilat, Red Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S122–S126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bohnsack, J. A. (1989). Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation or behavioural preference? Bulletin of Marine Science 44(2), 631–645.
Brock, R. E. (1994). Beyond fisheries enhancement: artificial reefs and ecotourism. Bulletin of Marine Science 55(2–3), 1181–1188.
Chabanet, P. , Ralambondrainy, H. , Amanieu, M. , Faure, G. , and Galzin, R. (1997). Relationships between coral reef substrata and fish. Coral Reefs 16, 93–102.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke, R. D. (1977). Habitat distribution and species diversity of chaetodontid and pomacentrid fishes near Bimini, Bahamas. Marine Biology 40, 277–289.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fabi, G. , Luccarni, F. , Panfili, M. , Solustri, C. , and Spagnolo, A. (2002). Effects of an artificial reef on the surrounding soft-bottom community (central Adriatic Sea). ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S343–S349.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gillanders, B. M. , and Kingsford, M. J. (1998). Influence of habitat on size structure of a large temperate-reef fish, Acherodus viridis (Pisces: Labridae). Marine Biology 132, 503–514.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hixon, M. A. (1998). Population dynamics of coral-reef fishes: controversial concepts and hypotheses. Australian Journal of Ecology 23, 192–201.
Pickering, H. , and Whitmarsh, D. (1997). Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fisheries Research 31, 39–59.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Relini, G. , Relini, M. , Torchia, G. , and Palandri, G. (2002). Ten years of censuses of fish fauna on the Loano artificial reef. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S132–S137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sherman, R. L. , Gilliam, D. S. , and Spieler, R. E. (2002). Artificial reef design: void space, complexity and attractants. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S196–S200.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vance, R. R. (1988). Ecological succession and the climax community on a marine subtidal rock wall. Marine Ecology Progress Series 48, 125–136.