Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Tuberculosis: yesterday, today and tomorrow

Chris Lowbridge A C and Anna P Ralph B D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0811, Australia

B Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, 105 Rocklands Drive, TIWI, NT 0801, Australia

C Email: christopher.lowbridge@menzies.edu.au

D Email: anna.ralph@menzies.edu.au

Microbiology Australia 41(4) 192-195 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA20052
Published: 20 October 2020

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains an important public health challenge globally and in Australia. For the more than 10 million people who become sick with TB each year, the disease can cause immense personal and economic hardship, including loss of income and education through ill health, prolonged and arduous treatment, and stigmatisation – perpetuating a cycle of disadvantage. Past efforts to control TB have taught us much about modern disease control and public health. As the world grapples with the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the response to TB provides valuable lessons which can inform our response to COVID-19.

Yesterday

Tuberculosis (TB), the disease caused by the closely related group of mycobacteria within the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, is spread person-to-person through infectious aerosols generated within the lungs of persons with pulmonary TB disease. M. tuberculosis emerged as a human pathogen in pre-historic times. It has been hypothesised that changes in early human behaviour around the use of controlled fire may have facilitated the evolution of M. tuberculosis from an environmental organism to human pathogen1,2. Through history, TB has caused more deaths than any single other infectious disease3.

TB is facilitated by economic disadvantage – overcrowded living conditions and substandard housing aid its spread. Modern changes in human behaviour brought on by the industrial revolution during the 18th and 19th centuries were exploited by the organism. At a time before the advent of effective treatments, the concentration of human populations within urban centres and large factories, characterised by cramped and overcrowded quarters, and poor sanitation and ventilation facilitated the amplification of TB spread4. These factors led to a peak in deaths from TB during the 1800s, when the disease is believed to have been responsible for around a quarter of all deaths in Europe5.

In 1882, Koch discovered the bacillus responsible for TB disease5. The early 20th century saw progress in reducing disease rates through improvements in sanitation and living standards, pasteurisation of milk – effective in controlling disease caused by M. bovis6 – and development of the Bacille Calmette Guérin (BCG) vaccine in the 1920s7. In the late 1940s, streptomycin and para-aminosalicylic acid were first used as anti-tuberculous treatments, followed by isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and rifampicin – the four drugs which still constitute the standard first-line regimen for TB treatment8.

As in the Northern hemisphere, TB was a leading cause of death in Australia at the turn of the 20th century9. Between 1948 and 1976, the Australian Tuberculosis Campaign provided free diagnostic and treatment services, and social support to those with TB. Anti-tuberculous drugs, once available, were also provided free10. The period of the Australian Tuberculosis Campaign saw a marked decrease in TB incidence in Australia; the program ended in 1976. The success of the Campaign highlights the role of active case finding in disease control. Australia has since maintained a low TB incidence, with <10 cases per 100 000 population reported annually11. This has led many to consider TB a disease of the past.


Today

Despite the advent of effective modern treatments, TB has exploited modern circumstances and remains a major global public health threat. The emergence of HIV, which increases the risk of activation of TB disease approximately 20-fold, became a driver of the TB epidemic, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa12,13. Meanwhile, drug-resistance has become a dangerous threat to TB control, with resistance emerging faster than the drug development pipeline. Increasing frequency of global travel and migration has aided disease spread across borders and meant that Australia and other low-burden countries must maintain robust systems for early detection of TB disease in high-risk groups14.

In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) published its Global End TB Strategy – marking a redirection from past TB control efforts to a more pro-active elimination strategy. The Strategy included ambitious targets to reduce TB-related deaths by 95% and the global incidence of TB by 90%, and to ensure that no TB-affected family faces catastrophic costs associated with TB treatment by 203515. In 2018, the President of the United Nations General Assembly took the exceptional measure of convening a United Nations High Level Meeting on TB to garner political commitment to achieve the Strategy16. Despite significant efforts, the world is not on track to meet the End TB Strategy Targets. The WHO reported an estimated 10 million incident cases of TB and 1.5 million TB deaths in 201817.

Following the reduction in Australia’s TB incidence during the Australian Tuberculosis Campaign, progress has plateaued – with essentially no reduction in TB incidence seen in the past three decades18. To achieve further progress, Australia must: scale up prevention of TB among those most likely to be infected who may go on to develop future TB disease; close the gap in TB burden faced by vulnerable and higher risk groups within the population; and contribute to addressing the TB epidemic at its source – beyond Australia’s borders.

A hallmark of M. tuberculosis is its ability to achieve a dormant state and cause asymptomatic infection in exposed hosts. This greatly complicates diagnosis and control. Previously termed ‘latent TB’, the preference is now to describe this as ‘TB infection’ to emphasise its importance and justify treatment. Nearly one-quarter of the world’s population is estimated to be infected with TB19, and approximately 10% will go on to develop TB disease20. Treatment of TB infection is effective at preventing activation of TB disease, but testing and treatment of TB infection is limited by poor diagnostic and treatment options, and incomplete reach to at-risk populations. Scaling up management of TB infection among high risk groups such as recently arrived migrants from high-burden countries would reduce the pool of people at risk of becoming new TB cases in the future.

The incidence of TB among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians remains around six times higher than that of the Australian born non-Indigenous population. The failure to close this gap highlights ongoing socioeconomic inequities and shortcomings in the health system’s ability to provide patient-centred, culturally sensitive care. Social factors such as overcrowded housing and medical factors such as delayed diagnosis of TB and worse treatment outcomes among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients, contribute to continued transmission of disease in some communities21.

Cross-border spread of TB, including drug-resistant TB, from Papua New Guinea to Australia’s Torres Strait Islands has been documented22. This demonstrates that whilst having strong systems for detection and treatment of TB within Australia is important, it is insufficient to eliminate TB. As a high-resource setting with access to vast expertise in TB control, Australia has a responsibility to support its neighbours in the Asia-Pacific, where there is a large burden of disease and limited resources for TB control. Investment in regional TB control is likely to have direct benefits for Australia too. In the United States, it has been estimated that strategic investment in TB control in other countries could lead to a reduction in TB morbidity and mortality and overall cost savings in the United States23. Australian researchers and TB experts are making significant contributions to regional TB control through collaborative efforts with countries in the region2426.


Tomorrow

Tomorrow undoubtedly holds new challenges and opportunities on the path towards TB elimination. Globally there remains a large pool of people with latent TB infection. Given aging populations and the increasing burden of diabetes and other non-communicable disease which may increase the risk of progression to active TB disease, we may expect to see a shift in the burden of TB towards older people with more complex health needs. Drug-resistant TB continues to emerge as an epidemic within an epidemic – facilitated by major gaps in case detection and treatment17.

Effective diagnostics and treatments are available for TB, yet these have not enabled us to overcome the global TB epidemic. Future efforts to eliminate TB will require both new tools and better use of existing ones. Molecular diagnostics such as GeneXpert® nucleic acid amplification test have improved detection of M. tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance and are now recommended first-line in place of microscopy27. However, access remains limited in many settings. Safer and more effective drugs would be welcomed for drug-resistant TB, but meanwhile, there are opportunities to improve the use of existing drugs. Several significant changes in drug-resistant TB treatment have been recently recommended by WHO, including a shorter (9-12 month) all-oral regimen for treatment of multi-drug resistant TB and a new 6–9 month regimen for multi-drug resistant TB with resistance to fluoroquinolones28. Shorter rifamycin-based regimens for treatment of latent TB infection are being increasingly utilised, with potential to improve uptake and completion of preventive therapy. Significant efforts are being made to develop new, more effective TB vaccines, with around 16 candidate vaccines currently in the pipeline29. One of these candidates – M72/AS01E, shows promise for the prevention of TB disease among adults who already have evidence of TB infection30.

Reflecting on progress made in reducing the global burden of TB provides relevant lessons for the response to COVID-19 and other communicable disease threats. It is clear that TB burden is intrinsically linked to the social determinants of health; addressing these underlying social and economic factors is critical. Public health responses should be guided by the principles of equity and social justice and services for diagnosis, treatment and care should be universally accessible and patient centred. Specifically, free testing for communicable diseases is essential; charging individuals for diagnostic tests diminishes case-finding and fosters disease transmission. Also, economic support is needed to keep people away from work – mandatory time off work while contagious with TB or COVID-19 is impossible for those on low incomes31. Early diagnosis through active case finding and appropriate procedures for isolation of infectious cases and infection control in health facilities is needed to prevent transmission both in communities and healthcare facilities. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, what we know from TB is the need for affected communities to be engaged and active in the response – to support one another, protect the most vulnerable and eliminate stigma and discrimination.


Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.



Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific funding.


References

[1]  Gagneux, S. (2018) Ecology and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 202–213.
Ecology and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29456241PubMed |

[2]  Chisholm, R.H. et al. (2016) Controlled fire use in early humans might have triggered the evolutionary emergence of tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9051–9056.
Controlled fire use in early humans might have triggered the evolutionary emergence of tuberculosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27457933PubMed |

[3]  Paulson, T. (2013) Epidemiology: a mortal foe. Nature 502, S2–S3.
Epidemiology: a mortal foe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24108078PubMed |

[4]  Barberis, I. et al. (2017) The history of tuberculosis: from the first historical records to the isolation of Koch’s bacillus. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 58, E9–E12.
| 28515626PubMed |

[5]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) History: World TB Day. https://www.cdc.gov/tb/worldtbday/history.htm (accessed 17 June 2020).

[6]  de la Rua-Domenech, R. (2006) Human Mycobacterium bovis infection in the United Kingdom: incidence, risks, control measures and review of the zoonotic aspects of bovine tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb.) 86, 77–109.
Human Mycobacterium bovis infection in the United Kingdom: incidence, risks, control measures and review of the zoonotic aspects of bovine tuberculosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16257579PubMed |

[7]  Luca, S. and Mihaescu, T. (2013) History of BCG vaccine. Maedica (Buchar.) 8, 53–58.

[8]  Keshavjee, S. and Farmer, P.E. (2012) Tuberculosis, drug resistance, and the history of modern medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 931–936.
Tuberculosis, drug resistance, and the history of modern medicine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22931261PubMed |

[9]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2006) Mortality over the twentieth century in Australia: trends and patterns in major causes of death. Mortality Surveillance Series, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.

[10]  National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (2020) History of tuberculosis control in Australia. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/resources/impact-case-studies/resources/history-tuberculosis-control-australia (accessed 17 June 2020).

[11]  Toms, C. et al. (2017) Tuberculosis notifications in Australia, 2014. Commun. Dis. Intell. Q. Rep. 41, E247–E263.
| 29720074PubMed |

[12]  Adeiza, M. et al. (2014) HIV-associated tuberculosis: a sub-saharan African perspective. Sub-Saharan African Journal of Medicine 1, 1–14.
HIV-associated tuberculosis: a sub-saharan African perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  World Health Organization (2020) Module 1: prevention (tuberculosis preventive treatment). In WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis. World Health Organization.

[14]  Kaushik, N. et al. (2018) Post-migration follow-up programme for migrants at increased risk of developing tuberculosis: a cohort study. ERJ Open Res. 4, 00008-02018.
Post-migration follow-up programme for migrants at increased risk of developing tuberculosis: a cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30018973PubMed |

[15]  World Health Organization (2018) The End TB Strategy: global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care and control after 2015. World Health Organization, Geneva.

[16]  Sahu, S. et al. (2019) After the UNGA high-level meeting on tuberculosis - what next and how? Lancet Glob. Health 7, e558–e560.
After the UNGA high-level meeting on tuberculosis - what next and how?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30876836PubMed |

[17]  World Health Organization (2019) Global tuberculosis report 2019. World Health Organization, Geneva.

[18]  World Health Organization (2020) Global tuberculosis database. https://www.who.int/tb/country/data/download/en/ (accessed 17 June 2020).

[19]  Houben, R.M.G.J. and Dodd, P.J. (2016) The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection: A re-estimation using mathematical modelling. PLoS Med. 13, e1002152.
The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection: A re-estimation using mathematical modelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Getahun, H. et al. (2015) Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2127–2135.
Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26017823PubMed |

[21]  Devlin, S. and Passmore, E. (2013) Ongoing transmission of tuberculosis in Aboriginal communities in NSW. NSW Public Health Bull. 24, 38–42.
Ongoing transmission of tuberculosis in Aboriginal communities in NSW.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Bainomugisa, A. et al. (2019) Cross-border movement of highly drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Papua New Guinea to Australia through Torres Strait Protected Zone, 2010–2015. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 25, 406–415.
Cross-border movement of highly drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Papua New Guinea to Australia through Torres Strait Protected Zone, 2010–2015.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30789135PubMed |

[23]  Schwartzman, K. et al. (2005) Domestic returns from investment in the control of tuberculosis in other countries. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1008–1020.
Domestic returns from investment in the control of tuberculosis in other countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16148286PubMed |

[24]  Marks, G.B. et al. (2019) Community-wide screening for tuberculosis in a high-prevalence setting. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 1347–1357.
Community-wide screening for tuberculosis in a high-prevalence setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31577876PubMed |

[25]  Lestari, T. et al. (2019) Bridging the knowledge-practice gap in tuberculosis contact management in a high-burden setting: a mixed-methods protocol for a multicenter health system strengthening study. Implement. Sci. 14, 31.
Bridging the knowledge-practice gap in tuberculosis contact management in a high-burden setting: a mixed-methods protocol for a multicenter health system strengthening study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30890160PubMed |

[26]  Morris, L. et al. (2019) The emergency response to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Daru, Western Province, Papua New Guinea, 2014-2017. Public Health Action 9, S4–S11.
The emergency response to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Daru, Western Province, Papua New Guinea, 2014-2017.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31580333PubMed |

[27]  World Health Organization (2020) Module 3: diagnosis (rapid diagnostics for tuberculosis detection). In WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis. World Health Organization.

[28]  World Health Organization (2020) Module 4: treatment (drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment). In WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis, World Health Organization.

[29]  Frick, M. (2019) Pipeline Report 2019: Tuberculosis Vaccines. Treatment Action Group, New York. https://www.treatmentactiongroup.org/resources/pipeline-report/2019-pipeline-report/ (accessed 11 September 2020).

[30]  Tait, D.R. et al. (2019) Final analysis of a trial of M72/AS01E vaccine to prevent tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 2429–2439.
Final analysis of a trial of M72/AS01E vaccine to prevent tuberculosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31661198PubMed |

[31]  Sutarsa, I.N. et al. (2020) No work, no money: how self-isolation due to COVID-19 pandemic punishes the poor in Indonesia. https://theconversation.com/no-work-no-money-how-self-isolation-due-to-covid-19-pandemic-punishes-the-poor-in-indonesia-134141 (accessed 22 July 2020).


Biographies

Dr Lowbridge is a Research Fellow at the Menzies School of Health Research in Darwin and Clinical Nurse Specialist at the Northern Territory Centre for Disease Control. He leads the TB research program at Menzies, and has research interests in health system strengthening for tuberculosis control in Northern Australia and the Asia-Pacific region and programmatic management of drug-resistant TB.

Professor Ralph is the Division Leader of Global and Tropical Health at Menzies School of Health Research in northern Australia, and the co-director of Rheumatic Heart Disease Australia. She is a practicing medical specialist in General Medicine and Infectious Diseases at Royal Darwin Hospital. Her main research interests are tuberculosis, rheumatic fever and Indigenous health.