Hand hygiene compliance: the elephant in the room
Stella Stevens A C , Lynn Hemmings A , Craig White B and Anthony Lawler A BA School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, 43 Collins Street, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.
B Tasmanian Department of Health and Human Services, GPO Box 125, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: stella.stevens@utas.edu.au
Healthcare Infection 18(2) 86-89 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI12056
Submitted: 12 November 2012 Accepted: 22 January 2013 Published: 23 April 2013
Journal Compilation © Australian Infection Control Association 2013
Abstract
Introduction: Hand hygiene compliance rates for medical staff are consistently lower than those for nurses. Strong leadership to improve compliance has been repeatedly called for, but studies exploring medical staff leadership influence are limited. The qualitative study reported here aimed to explore the perceptions that medical staff have of their clinical leaders and the extent to which they influence hand hygiene practice in their clinical units, and to compare this with unit specific compliance data.
Method: Thirty junior doctors from a major tertiary hospital were interviewed or surveyed to uncover their perceptions of clinical leadership and its influence on hand hygiene behaviours. Compliance data for their clinical areas for the corresponding period was obtained and compared with their views on the influence of leadership on hand hygiene behaviour.
Findings: Consultants, rather than infection control nurses, were seen to have the most influence over medical hand hygiene practices. The unit that scored the best on compliance was also the one where the consultant was perceived to have the most influence.
Conclusion: Junior medical staff know that hand hygiene is important but the extent to which they comply with it depends on the influence of the consultant. Infection control staff need to engage consultants in order to improve medical compliance rates, rather than directing their efforts to medical staff in general.
References
[1] Grayson M, Russo P, Cruickshank M, Bear J, Gee C, Hughes C. Outcomes from the first two years of the Australian National Hand Hygiene Initiative. Med J Aust 2011; 195 615–9.| Outcomes from the first two years of the Australian National Hand Hygiene Initiative.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22107015PubMed |
[2] Collingnon P, Grayson L, Johnson P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals: time for a culture change. Med J Aust 2007; 187 4–5.
[3] Birk S. Creating a culture of safety: Why CEOs hold the key to improved outcomes. Healthc Exec 2009; 24 14–20.
| 19326743PubMed |
[4] Goodspeed R. Sentinel Event Alert pairs leadership and safety. Hosp Infect Control Prevent 2009; Supplement December.
[5] The Joint Commission’s Center for Transforming Healthcare. Patient Safety is in your H.A.N.D.S. Hosp Infect Control Prevent 2009; Supplement December.
[6] Jamal A, O’Grady G, Harnett E, Dalton D, Andresen D. Improving hand hygiene in a paediatric hospital: a multimodal quality improvement approach. BMJ Quality and Safety 2012; 21 171–6.
| Improving hand hygiene in a paediatric hospital: a multimodal quality improvement approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22213377PubMed |
[7] Ovretveit J. Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research. BMJ Quality and Safety 2010; 19 490–2.
| Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Saint S, Kowalski C, Banaszak-Holl J, Forman J, Damschroder L, Krein S. The importance of leadership in preventing healthcare-associated infection: results of a multisite qualitative study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31 901–7.
| The importance of leadership in preventing healthcare-associated infection: results of a multisite qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20658939PubMed |
[9] Sloane T, Shaban R, Gillespie B. Barriers and enablers to the uptake of alcohol-based hand rubs for pre-operative hand antisepsis in the operating room: an Australian perspective. Healthc Infect 2012; 17 25–32.
| Barriers and enablers to the uptake of alcohol-based hand rubs for pre-operative hand antisepsis in the operating room: an Australian perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Hand Hygiene Australia. Audit tools. Hand Hygiene Australia; 2011. Available from: www.hha.org.au/ForHealthcareWorkers/auditing.aspx [verified 29 March 2013]
[11] World Health Organization. Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
