Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
REVIEW

Genome editing for improvement of biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in cereals

Safeena Inam A # , Amna Muhammad A # , Samra Irum A , Nazia Rehman A , Aamir Riaz https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-277X A , Muhammad Uzair https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-9762 A * and Muhammad Ramzan Khan A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Functional Genomics and Bioinformatics Labs, National Institute for Genomics and Advance Biotechnology (NIGAB), NARC, Park Road, Islamabad 45500, Pakistan. Email: safeenainam@gmail.com, amnamuhammad.uaar@gmail.com, samrairum2@gmail.com, naziarehman96@yahoo.com, aamirriaz33@gmail.com

# These authors contributed equally to this paper

Handling Editor: Sajid Fiaz

Functional Plant Biology 51, FP24092 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP24092
Submitted: 25 March 2024  Accepted: 1 August 2024  Published: 2 September 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Global agricultural production must quadruple by 2050 to fulfil the needs of a growing global population, but climate change exacerbates the difficulty. Cereals are a very important source of food for the world population. Improved cultivars are needed, with better resistance to abiotic stresses like drought, salt, and increasing temperatures, and resilience to biotic stressors like bacterial and fungal infections, and pest infestation. A popular, versatile, and helpful method for functional genomics and crop improvement is genome editing. Rapidly developing genome editing techniques including clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) are very important. This review focuses on how CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing might enhance cereals’ agronomic qualities in the face of climate change, providing important insights for future applications. Genome editing efforts should focus on improving characteristics that confer tolerance to conditions exacerbated by climate change (e.g. drought, salt, rising temperatures). Improved water usage efficiency, salt tolerance, and heat stress resilience are all desirable characteristics. Cultivars that are more resilient to insect infestations and a wide range of biotic stressors, such as bacterial and fungal diseases, should be created. Genome editing can precisely target genes linked to disease resistance pathways to strengthen cereals’ natural defensive systems.

Keywords: agricultural innovation, biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, cereals, climate change, CRISPR variants, disease resistance, genome editing, plant biotechnology.

References

Ahmad M (2023) Plant breeding advancements with “CRISPR-Cas” genome editing technologies will assist future food security. Frontiers in Plant Science 14, 1133036.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Ainley WM, Sastry-Dent L, Welter ME, Murray MG, Zeitler B, Amora R, Corbin DR, Miles RR, Arnold NL, Strange TL, Simpson MA, Cao Z, Carroll C, Pawelczak KS, Blue R, West K, Rowland LM, Perkins D, Samuel P, Dewes CM, Shen L, Sriram S, Evans SL, Rebar EJ, Zhang L, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Webb SR, Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing. Plant Biotechnology Journal 11, 1126-1134.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Akbar M, Aleem K, Sandhu K, Shamoon F, Fatima T, Ehsan M, Shaukat F (2023) A mini review on insect pests of wheat and their management strategies. International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences 12, 110-115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Akram F, Sahreen S, Aamir F, Haq Iu, Malik K, Imtiaz M, Naseem W, Nasir N, Waheed HM (2023) An insight into modern targeted genome-editing technologies with a special focus on CRISPR/Cas9 and its applications. Molecular Biotechnology 65, 227-242.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Alam MS, Kong J, Tao R, Ahmed T, Alamin M, Alotaibi SS, Abdelsalam NR, Xu J-H (2022) CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout of the OsbHLH024 transcription factor improves salt stress resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plants 11, 1184.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Alfatih A, Wu J, Jan SU, Zhang Z-S, Xia J-Q, Xiang C-B (2020) Loss of rice PARAQUAT TOLERANCE 3 confers enhanced resistance to abiotic stresses and increases grain yield in field. Plant, Cell & Environment 43, 2743-2754.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Ansari WA, Chandanshive SU, Bhatt V, Nadaf AB, Vats S, Katara JL, Sonah H, Deshmukh R (2020) Genome editing in cereals: approaches, applications and challenges. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, 4040.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Arora L, Narula A (2017) Gene editing and crop improvement using CRISPR-Cas9 system. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 1932.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Asmamaw M, Zawdie B (2021) Mechanism and applications of CRISPR/Cas-9-mediated genome editing. Biologics: Targets and Therapy 15, 353-361.
| Google Scholar |

Basu U, Riaz Ahmed S, Bhat BA, Anwar Z, Ali A, Ijaz A, Gulzar A, Bibi A, Tyagi A, Nebapure SM, Goud CA, Ahanger SA, Ali S, Mushtaq M (2023) A CRISPR way for accelerating cereal crop improvement: progress and challenges. Frontiers in Genetics 13, 866976.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Bharat SS, Li S, Li J, Yan L, Xia L (2020) Base editing in plants: current status and challenges. The Crop Journal 8, 384-395.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bhardwaj A, Nain V (2021) TALENs—an indispensable tool in the era of CRISPR: a mini review. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 19, 125.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Bhattacharya A (2022) Effect of low temperature stress on photosynthesis and allied traits: a review. In ‘Physiological processes in plants under low temperature stress’. (Ed. A Bhattacharya) pp. 199–297. (Springer: Singapore)

Bhuyan SJ, Kumar M, Devde PR, Rai AC, Mishra AK, Singh PK, Siddique KHM (2023) Progress in gene editing tools, implications and success in plants: a review. Frontiers in Genome Editing 5, 1272678.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bisht DS, Bhatia V, Bhattacharya R (2019) Improving plant-resistance to insect-pests and pathogens: the new opportunities through targeted genome editing. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 96, 65-76.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Blanvillain-Baufumé S, Reschke M, Solé M, Auguy F, Doucoure H, Szurek B, Meynard D, Portefaix M, Cunnac S, Guiderdoni E, Boch J, Koebnik R (2017) Targeted promoter editing for rice resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae reveals differential activities for SWEET 14-inducing TAL effectors. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15, 306-317.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Brauer EK, Balcerzak M, Rocheleau H, Leung W, Schernthaner J, Subramaniam R, Ouellet T (2020) Genome editing of a deoxynivalenol-induced transcription factor confers resistance to Fusarium graminearum in wheat. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 33, 553-560.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Buttner D, He SY (2009) Type III protein secretion in plant pathogenic bacteria. Plant Physiology 150, 1656-1664.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Cao Y, Song F, Goodman RM, Zheng Z (2006) Molecular characterization of four rice genes encoding ethylene-responsive transcriptional factors and their expressions in response to biotic and abiotic stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 163, 1167-1178.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Cao Y, Zhou H, Zhou X, Li F (2020) Control of plant viruses by CRISPR/Cas system-mediated adaptive immunity. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 593700.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Cardi T, Neal Stewart C, Jr (2016) Progress of targeted genome modification approaches in higher plants. Plant Cell Reports 35, 1401-1416.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Chandrasegaran S, Carroll D (2016) Origins of programmable nucleases for genome engineering. Journal of Molecular Biology 428, 963-989.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Chang J-D, Huang S, Yamaji N, Zhang W, Ma JF, Zhao F-J (2020) OsNRAMP1 transporter contributes to cadmium and manganese uptake in rice. Plant, Cell and Environment 43, 2476-2491.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chen X, Shang J, Chen D, Lei C, Zou Y, Zhai W, Liu G, Xu J, Ling Z, Cao G, Ma B, Wang Y, Zhao X, Li S, Zhu L (2006) A B-lectin receptor kinase gene conferring rice blast resistance. The Plant Journal 46, 794-804.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang H, Gao C (2019) CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annual Review of Plant Biology 70, 667-697.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Chu C, Huang R, Liu L, Tang G, Xiao J, Yoo H, Yuan M (2022) The rice heavy-metal transporter OsNRAMP1 regulates disease resistance by modulating ROS homoeostasis. Plant, Cell and Environment 45, 1109-1126.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Costa JR, Bejcek BE, McGee JE, Fogel AI, Brimacombe KR, Ketteler R (2017) Genome editing using engineered nucleases and their use in genomic screening. In ‘Assay Guidance Manual’. (Eds S Markossian, A Grossman, M Arkin, et al.) pp. 931–954. (Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Bethesda, MD, USA)

Craig W, Tepfer M, Degrassi G, Ripandelli D (2008) An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Euphytica 164, 853-880.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

D’Halluin K, Vanderstraeten C, Stals E, Cornelissen M, Ruiter R (2008) Homologous recombination: a basis for targeted genome optimization in crop species such as maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6, 93-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

El-Maarouf-Bouteau H (2022) The seed and the metabolism regulation. Biology 11, 168.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U, Anjum SA, Farooq A, Zohaib A, Sadia S, Nasim W, Adkins S, Saud S, Ihsan MZ, Alharby H, Wu C, Wang D, Huang J (2017) Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 1147.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fatima Z, Ahmed M, Hussain M, Abbas G, Ul-Allah S, Ahmad S, Ahmed N, Ali MA, Sarwar G, Haque Eu, Iqbal P, Hussain S (2020) The fingerprints of climate warming on cereal crops phenology and adaptation options. Scientific Reports 10, 18013.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Foster AJ, Martin-Urdiroz M, Yan X, Wright HS, Soanes DM, Talbot NJ (2018) CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-mediated co-editing and counterselection in the rice blast fungus. Scientific Reports 8, 14355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF, III (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends in Biotechnology 31, 397-405.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gao W, Xu W-T, Huang K-L, Guo M-z, Luo Y-B (2018) Risk analysis for genome editing-derived food safety in China. Food Control 84, 128-137.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

González Castro N, Bjelic J, Malhotra G, Huang C, Alsaffar SH (2021) Comparison of the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of genome editing technologies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, 10355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gosavi G, Yan F, Ren B, Kuang Y, Yan D, Zhou X, Zhou H (2020) Applications of CRISPR technology in studying plant-pathogen interactions: overview and perspective. Phytopathology Research 2, 21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gu S, Bodai Z, Cowan QT, Komor AC (2021) Base editors: expanding the types of DNA damage products harnessed for genome editing. Gene and Genome Editing 1, 100005.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Guan Y, Hwarari D, Korboe HM, Ahmad B, Cao Y, Movahedi A, Yang L (2023) Low temperature stress-induced perception and molecular signaling pathways in plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 207, 105190.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Guha TK, Edgell DR (2017) Applications of alternative nucleases in the age of CRISPR/Cas9. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, 2565.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gunasekara JMA, Jayasekera GAU, Perera KLNS, Wickramasuriya AM (2017) Development of a Sri Lankan rice variety Bg 94-1 harbouring cry2A gene of Bacillus thuringiensis resistant to rice leaffolder [Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée)]. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 45, 143-157.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Han X, Chen Z, Li P, Xu H, Liu K, Zha W, Li S, Chen J, Yang G, Huang J, You A, Zhou L (2022) Development of novel rice germplasm for salt-tolerance at seedling stage using CRISPR-Cas9. Sustainability 14, 2621.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M (2022) Plant responses and tolerance to salt stress: physiological and molecular interventions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, 4810.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

He Y, Zhao Y (2020) Technological breakthroughs in generating transgene-free and genetically stable CRISPR-edited plants. aBIOTECH 1, 88-96.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hille F, Richter H, Wong SP, Bratovič M, Ressel S, Charpentier E (2018) The biology of CRISPR-Cas: backward and forward. Cell 172, 1239-1259.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hisano H, Abe F, Hoffie RE, Kumlehn J (2021) Targeted genome modifications in cereal crops. Breeding Science 71, 405-416.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hoque MN, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Hannan A, Sultana N, Akhter S, Hasanuzzaman M, Akter F, Hossain MS, Sayed MA, Hasan MT, Skalicky M, Li X, Brestič M (2021) Melatonin modulates plant tolerance to heavy metal stress: morphological responses to molecular mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, 11445.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Huang Z, Liu G (2023) Current advancement in the application of prime editing. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 11, 1039315.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hulme PE (2022) Global drivers of herbicide-resistant weed richness in major cereal crops worldwide. Pest Management Science 78, 1824-1832.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hussain B, Lucas SJ, Budak H (2018) CRISPR/Cas9 in plants: at play in the genome and at work for crop improvement. Briefings in Functional Genomics 17, 319-328.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jagadish SVK, Way DA, Sharkey TD (2021) Plant heat stress: concepts directing future research. Plant, Cell & Environment 44, 1992-2005.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Janik E, Niemcewicz M, Ceremuga M, Krzowski L, Saluk-Bijak J, Bijak M (2020) Various aspects of a gene editing system—CRISPR–cas9. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, 9604.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP (2013) Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Research 41, e188.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Jørgensen IH (1992) Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica 63, 141-152.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kantor A, McClements ME, MacLaren RE (2020) CRISPR-Cas9 DNA base-editing and prime-editing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, 6240.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

KhokharVoytas A, Shahbaz M, Maqsood MF, Zulfiqar U, Naz N, Iqbal UZ, Sara M, Aqeel M, Khalid N, Noman A, Zulfiqar F, Al Syaad KM, AlShaqhaa MA (2023) Genetic modification strategies for enhancing plant resilience to abiotic stresses in the context of climate change. Functional & Integrative Genomics 23, 283.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kim D, Alptekin B, Budak H (2018) CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat. Functional & Integrative Genomics 18, 31-41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kim Y-A, Moon H, Park C-J (2019) CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of Os8N3 in rice to confer resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Rice 12, 71.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kis A, Hamar É, Tholt G, Bán R, Havelda Z (2019) Creating highly efficient resistance against wheat dwarf virus in barley by employing CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant Biotechnology Journal 17, 1004-1006.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Koeppel I, Hertig C, Hoffie R, Kumlehn J (2019) Cas endonuclease technology—a quantum leap in the advancement of barley and wheat genetic engineering. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, 2647.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kopecká R, Kameniarová M, Černý M, Brzobohatý B, Novák J (2023) Abiotic Stress in Crop Production. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, 6603.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kumar N, Galli M, Ordon J, Stuttmann J, Kogel K-H, Imani J (2018) Further analysis of barley MORC1 using a highly efficient RNA-guided Cas9 gene-editing system. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16, 1892-1903.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Laghmouchi Y, Belmehdi O, Bouyahya A, Skali Senhaji N, Abrini J (2017) Effect of temperature, salt stress and pH on seed germination of medicinal plant Origanum compactum. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 10, 156-160.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lamers J, van der Meer T, Testerink C (2020) How Plants Sense and Respond to Stressful Environments. Plant Physiology 182, 1624-1635.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Langner T, Kamoun S, Belhaj K (2018) CRISPR crops: plant genome editing toward disease resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 56, 479-512.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B (2012) High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nature Biotechnology 30, 390-392.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Li J, Meng X, Zong Y, Chen K, Zhang H, Liu J, Li J, Gao C (2016) Gene replacements and insertions in rice by intron targeting using CRISPR–Cas9. Nature Plants 2, 16139.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Li C, Liu C, Qi X, Wu Y, Fei X, Mao L, Cheng B, Li X, Xie C (2017) RNA-guided Cas9 as an in vivo desired-target mutator in maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15, 1566-1576.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Li C, Li W, Zhou Z, Chen H, Xie C, Lin Y (2020a) A new rice breeding method: CRISPR/Cas9 system editing of the Xa13 promoter to cultivate transgene-free bacterial blight-resistant rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18, 313-315.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Li H, Yang Y, Hong W, Huang M, Wu M, Zhao X (2020b) Applications of genome editing technology in the targeted therapy of human diseases: mechanisms, advances and prospects. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 5, 1.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Li Y, Wu X, Zhang Y, Zhang Q (2022) CRISPR/Cas genome editing improves abiotic and biotic stress tolerance of crops. Frontiers in Genome Editing 4, 987817.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Liang Y, Han Y, Wang C, Jiang C, Xu J-R (2018) Targeted deletion of the USTA and UvSLT2 genes efficiently in Ustilaginoidea virens with the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 699.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Liu D, Chen X, Liu J, Ye J, Guo Z (2012) The rice ERF transcription factor OsERF922 negatively regulates resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae and salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 3899-3911.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Liu X, Qin R, Li J, Liao S, Shan T, Xu R, Wu D, Wei P (2020a) A CRISPR-Cas9-mediated domain-specific base-editing screen enables functional assessment of ACCase variants in rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18, 1845.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Liu X, Wu D, Shan T, Xu S, Qin R, Li H, Negm M, Wu D, Li J (2020b) The trihelix transcription factor OsGTγ-2 is involved adaption to salt stress in rice. Plant Molecular Biology 103, 545-560.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Liu Z, Ma C, Hou L, Wu X, Wang D, Zhang L, Liu P (2022) Exogenous SA affects rice seed germination under salt stress by regulating Na+/K+ balance and endogenous GAs and ABA homeostasis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, 3293.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lou D, Wang H, Liang G, Yu D (2017) OsSAPK2 confers abscisic acid sensitivity and tolerance to drought stress in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 993.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lou D, Wang H, Yu D (2018) The sucrose non-fermenting-1-related protein kinases SAPK1 and SAPK2 function collaboratively as positive regulators of salt stress tolerance in rice. BMC Plant Biology 18, 203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lu Y, Zhu J-K (2017) Precise editing of a target base in the rice genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Molecular Plant 10, 523-525.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lu H-P, Luo T, Fu H-W, Wang L, Tan Y-Y, Huang J-Z, Wang Q, Ye G-Y, Gatehouse AMR, Lou Y-G, Shu Q-Y (2018) Resistance of rice to insect pests mediated by suppression of serotonin biosynthesis. Nature Plants 4, 338-344.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lyu P, Wang L, Lu B (2020) Virus-like particle mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery for efficient and safe genome editing. Life 10, 366.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Ma J, Chen J, Wang M, Ren Y, Wang S, Lei C, Cheng Z, Sodmergen (2018) Disruption of OsSEC3A increases the content of salicylic acid and induces plant defense responses in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany 69, 1051-1064.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Macovei A, Sevilla NR, Cantos C, Jonson GB, Slamet-Loedin I, Čermák T, Voytas DF, Choi I-R, Chadha-Mohanty P (2018) Novel alleles of rice eIF4G generated by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis confer resistance to Rice tungro spherical virus. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16, 1918-1927.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Matres JM, Hilscher J, Datta A, Armario-Nájera V, Baysal C, He W, Huang X, Zhu C, Valizadeh-Kamran R, Trijatmiko KR, Capell T, Christou P, Stoger E, Slamet-Loedin IH (2021) Genome editing in cereal crops: an overview. Transgenic Research 30, 461-498.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Miao C, Xiao L, Hua K, Zou C, Zhao Y, Bressan RA, Zhu J-K (2018) Mutations in a subfamily of abscisic acid receptor genes promote rice growth and productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 6058-6063.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Miller JB, Zhang S, Kos P, Xiong H, Zhou K, Perelman SS, Zhu H, Siegwart DJ (2017) Non-viral CRISPR/Cas gene editing in vitro and in vivo enabled by synthetic nanoparticle co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA. Angewandte Chemie 129, 1079-1083.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mittler R, Blumwald E (2010) Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 443-462.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Mittler R, Zandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Van Breusegem F (2022) Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 23, 663-679.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Mohanta T, Bashir T, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF, Bae H (2017) Genome editing tools in plants. Genes 8, 399,.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Moon TT, Maliha IJ, Khan AAM, Chakraborty M, Uddin MS, Amin MR, Islam T (2022) CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing for Insect Pest Stress Management in Crop Plants. Stresses 2, 493-514.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nandy S, Pathak B, Zhao S, Srivastava V (2019) Heat-shock-inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system generates heritable mutations in rice. Plant Direct 3, e00145.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Nawaz G, Han Y, Usman B, Liu F, Qin B, Li R (2019) Knockout of OsPRP1, a gene encoding proline-rich protein, confers enhanced cold sensitivity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) at the seedling stage. 3 Biotech 9, 254.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nawaz G, Usman B, Peng H, Zhao N, Yuan R, Liu Y, Li R (2020) Knockout of Pi21 by CRISPR/Cas9 and iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis of mutants revealed new insights into M. oryzae resistance in elite rice line. Genes 11, 735.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Nerkar G, Devarumath S, Purankar M, Kumar A, Valarmathi R, Devarumath R, Appunu C (2022) Advances in crop breeding through precision genome editing. Frontiers in Genetics 13, 880195.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Nieves-Cordones M, Mohamed S, Tanoi K, Kobayashi NI, Takagi K, Vernet A, Guiderdoni E, Périn C, Sentenac H, Véry A-A (2017) Production of low-Cs+ rice plants by inactivation of the K+ transporter OsHAK1 with the CRISPR-Cas system. The Plant Journal 92, 43-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Ogata T, Ishizaki T, Fujita M, Fujita Y (2020) CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of OsERA1 confers enhanced responses to abscisic acid and drought stress and increased primary root growth under nonstressed conditions in rice. PLoS ONE 15, e0243376.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Oliva R, Ji C, Atienza-Grande G, Huguet-Tapia JC, Perez-Quintero A, Li T, Eom J-S, Li C, Nguyen H, Liu B, Auguy F, Sciallano C, Luu VT, Dossa GS, Cunnac S, Schmidt SM, Slamet-Loedin IH, Vera Cruz C, Szurek B, Frommer WB, White FF, Yang B (2019) Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nature Biotechnology 37, 1344-1350.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pan J, Sharif R, Xu X, Chen X (2021) Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in plants: research progress and prospects. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 627331.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Park J, Choe S (2019) DNA-free genome editing with preassembled CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins in plants. Transgenic Research 28, 61-64.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pathi KM, Rink P, Budhagatapalli N, Betz R, Saado I, Hiekel S, Becker M, Djamei A, Kumlehn J (2020) Engineering smut resistance in maize by site-directed mutagenesis of LIPOXYGENASE 3. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 543895.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Qiu Z, Kang S, He L, Zhao J, Zhang S, Hu J, Zeng D, Zhang G, Dong G, Gao Z, Ren D, Chen G, Guo L, Qian Q, Zhu L (2018) The newly identified heat-stress sensitive albino 1 gene affects chloroplast development in rice. Plant Science 267, 168-179.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Rehman I, Shaukat F, Anwar Z, Ijaz A, Nadeem R (2022) Applications of Crispr/Cas system in plants. International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences 11(4), 231-237.
| Google Scholar |

Ren B, Yan F, Kuang Y, Li N, Zhang D, Zhou X, Lin H, Zhou H (2018) Improved base editor for efficiently inducing genetic variations in rice with CRISPR/Cas9-guided hyperactive hAID mutant. Molecular Plant 11, 623-626.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sallam A, Alqudah AM, Dawood MFA, Baenziger PS, Börner A (2019) Drought stress tolerance in wheat and barley: advances in physiology, breeding and genetics research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, 3137.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sánchez-García EA, Rodríguez-Medina K, Moreno-Casasola P (2017) Effects of soil saturation and salinity on seed germination in seven freshwater marsh species from the tropical coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Aquatic Botany 140, 4-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Santosh Kumar VV, Verma RK, Yadav SK, Yadav P, Watts A, Rao MV, Chinnusamy V (2020) CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing of drought and salt tolerance (OsDST) gene in indica mega rice cultivar MTU1010. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 26, 1099-1110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Savary S, Willocquet L, Pethybridge SJ, Esker P, McRoberts N, Nelson A (2019) The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3, 430-439.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Scaven VL, Rafferty NE (2013) Physiological effects of climate warming on flowering plants and insect pollinators and potential consequences for their interactions. Current Zoology 59, 418-426.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Schaeffer SM, Nakata PA (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: transitioning from lab to field. Plant Science 240, 130-142.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Schneider JR, Caverzan A, Chavarria G (2018) Water deficit stress, ROS involvement, and plant performance. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65, 1160-1181.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Seleiman MF, Al-Suhaibani N, Ali N, Akmal M, Alotaibi M, Refay Y, Dindaroglu T, Abdul-Wajid HH, Battaglia ML (2021) Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants 10, 259.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sha Z, Bai Y, Li R, Lan H, Zhang X, Li J, Liu X, Chang S, Xie Y (2022) The global carbon sink potential of terrestrial vegetation can be increased substantially by optimal land management. Communications Earth & Environment 3, 8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Gao C (2014) Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nature Protocols 9, 2395-2410.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Shen C, Que Z, Xia Y, Tang N, Li D, He R, Cao M (2017) Knock out of the annexin gene OsAnn3 via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing decreased cold tolerance in rice. Journal of Plant Biology 60, 539-547.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Shi J, Gao H, Wang H, Lafitte HR, Archibald RL, Yang M, Hakimi SM, Mo H, Habben JE (2017) ARGOS8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15, 207-216.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Shimatani Z, Kashojiya S, Takayama M, Terada R, Arazoe T, Ishii H, Teramura H, Yamamoto T, Komatsu H, Miura K, Ezura H, Nishida K, Ariizumi T, Kondo A (2017) Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Nature Biotechnology 35, 441-443.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Shukla VK, Doyon Y, Miller JC, DeKelver RC, Moehle EA, Worden SE, Mitchell JC, Arnold NL, Gopalan S, Meng X, Choi VM, Rock JM, Wu Y-Y, Katibah GE, Zhifang G, McCaskill D, Simpson MA, Blakeslee B, Greenwalt SA, Butler HJ, Hinkley SJ, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459, 437-441.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Songmei L, Jie J, Yang L, Jun M, Shouling X, Yuanyuan T, Youfa L, Qingyao S, Jianzhong H (2019) Characterization and evaluation of OsLCT1 and OsNramp5 mutants generated through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis for breeding low Cd rice. Rice Science 26, 88-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sun YW, Jiao GA, Liu ZP, Zhang X, Li JY, Guo XP, Du WM, Du JL, Francis F, Zhao YD, Xia LQ (2017) Generation of high-amylose rice through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of starch branching enzymes. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 298.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Svitashev S, Schwartz C, Lenderts B, Young JK, Mark Cigan A (2016) Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nature Communications 7, 13274.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Syed A, Sarwar G, Shah SH, Muhammad S (2020) Soil salinity research in 21st century in Pakistan: its impact on availability of plant nutrients, growth and yield of crops. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 52, 183-200.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tsanova T, Stefanova L, Topalova L, Atanasov A, Pantchev I (2021) DNA-free gene editing in plants: a brief overview. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 35, 131-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Usman B, Nawaz G, Zhao N, Liao S, Liu Y, Li R (2020) Precise editing of the OsPYL9 gene by RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease confers enhanced drought tolerance and grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by regulating circadian rhythm and abiotic stress responsive proteins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, 7854.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Van Esse HP, Reuber TL, van der Does D (2020) Genetic modification to improve disease resistance in crops. New Phytologist 225, 70-86.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Vlčko T, Ohnoutková L (2020) Allelic variants of CRISPR/Cas9 Induced mutation in an inositol trisphosphate 5/6 kinase gene manifest different phenotypes in barley. Plants 9, 195.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Voytas DF (2013) Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64, 327-350.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Gao C, Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nature Biotechnology 32, 947-951.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wang F, Wang C, Liu P, Lei C, Hao W, Gao Y, Liu Y-G, Zhao K (2016a) Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922. PLoS ONE 11, e0154027.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wang H, La Russa M, Qi LS (2016b) CRISPR/Cas9 in genome editing and beyond. Annual Review of Biochemistry 85, 227-264.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wang F-Z, Chen M-X, Yu L-J, Xie L-J, Yuan L-B, Qi H, Xiao M, Guo W, Chen Z, Yi K, Zhang J, Qiu R, Shu W, Xiao S, Chen Q-F (2017) OsARM1, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor, is involved in regulation of the response to arsenic stress in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 1868.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wang Q, Guo Q, Niu W, Wu L, Gong W, Yan S, Nishinari K, Zhao M (2022) The pH-responsive phase separation of type-A gelatin and dextran characterized with static multiple light scattering (S-MLS). Food Hydrocolloids 127, 107503.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wei T, Cheng Q, Min Y-L, Olson EN, Siegwart DJ (2020) Systemic nanoparticle delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins for effective tissue specific genome editing. Nature Communications 11, 3232.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wolter F, Schindele P, Puchta H (2019) Plant breeding at the speed of light: the power of CRISPR/Cas to generate directed genetic diversity at multiple sites. BMC Plant Biology 19, 176.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, Corvalán C, Cho SW, Kim H, Kim S-G, Kim S-T, Choe S, Kim J-S (2015) DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nature Biotechnology 33, 1162-1164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Xie K, Yang Y (2013) RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR–Cas system. Molecular Plant 6, 1975-1983.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Xie Y, Haq SIU, Jiang X, Zheng D, Feng N, Wang W, He J-S, Qiu Q-S (2022) Plant genome editing: CRISPR, base editing, prime editing, and beyond. Grassland Research 1, 234-243.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Xu Z, Xu X, Gong Q, Li Z, Li Y, Wang S, Yang Y, Ma W, Liu L, Zhu B, Zou L, Chen G (2019) Engineering broad-spectrum bacterial blight resistance by simultaneously disrupting variable TALE-binding elements of multiple susceptibility genes in rice. Molecular Plant 12, 1434-1446.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Yang T, Zhang Y, Guo L, Li D, Liu A, Bilal M, Xie C, Yang R, Gu Z, Jiang D, Wang P (2024) Antifreeze polysaccharides from wheat bran: the structural characterization and antifreeze mechanism. Biomacromolecules 25, 3877-3892.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yao X, Xie R, Zan X, Su Y, Xu P, Liu W (2023) A novel image encryption scheme for DNA storage systems based on DNA hybridization and gene mutation. Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences 15, 419-432.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Yin X, Biswal AK, Dionora J, Perdigon KM, Balahadia CP, Mazumdar S, Chater C, Lin H-C, Coe RA, Kretzschmar T, Gray JE, Quick PW, Bandyopadhyay A (2017) CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cpf1 mediated targeting of a stomatal developmental gene EPFL9 in rice. Plant Cell Reports 36, 745-757.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Yip BH (2020) Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery strategies. Biomolecules 10, 839.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Yuan B, Zhang S, Song L, Chen J, Cao J, Qiu J, Qiu Z, Chen J, Zhao X-M, Cheng T-L (2023) Engineering of cytosine base editors with DNA damage minimization and editing scope diversification. Nucleic Acids Research 51, e105.
| Google Scholar |

Zahra N, Hafeez MB, Ghaffar A, Kausar A, Zeidi MA, Siddique KHM, Farooq M (2023) Plant photosynthesis under heat stress: effects and management. Environmental and Experimental Botany 206, 105178.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Zaidi SS-e-A, Mukhtar MS, Mansoor S (2018) Genome editing: targeting susceptibility genes for plant disease resistance. Trends in Biotechnology 36, 898-906.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Zeng D-D, Yang C-C, Qin R, Alamin M, Yue E-K, Jin X-L, Shi C-H (2018) A guanine insert in OsBBS1 leads to early leaf senescence and salt stress sensitivity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Reports 37, 933-946.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zeng Y, Wen J, Zhao W, Wang Q, Huang W (2020) rational improvement of rice yield and cold tolerance by editing the three genes OsPIN5b, GS3, and OsMYB30 with the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 1663.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Zhang Y, Bai Y, Wu G, Zou S, Chen Y, Gao C, Tang D (2017) Simultaneous modification of three homoeologs of TaEDR1 by genome editing enhances powdery mildew resistance in wheat. The Plant Journal 91, 714-724.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhang A, Liu Y, Wang F, Li T, Chen Z, Kong D, Bi J, Zhang F, Luo X, Wang J, Tang J, Yu X, Liu G, Luo L (2019a) Enhanced rice salinity tolerance via CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the OsRR22 gene. Molecular Breeding 39, 47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Zhang T, Zhao Y, Ye J, Cao X, Xu C, Chen B, An H, Jiao Y, Zhang F, Yang X, Zhou G (2019b) Establishing CRISPR/Cas13a immune system conferring RNA virus resistance in both dicot and monocot plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal 17, 1185-1187.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhang R, Liu J, Chai Z, Chen S, Bai Y, Zong Y, Chen K, Li J, Jiang L, Gao C (2019c) Generation of herbicide tolerance traits and a new selectable marker in wheat using base editing. Nature Plants 5, 480-485.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhang D, Hussain A, Manghwar H, Xie K, Xie S, Zhao S, Larkin RM, Qing P, Jin S, Ding F (2020) Genome editing with the CRISPR-Cas system: an art, ethics and global regulatory perspective. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18, 1651-1669.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhang Y, Iaffaldano B, Qi Y (2021) CRISPR ribonucleoprotein-mediated genetic engineering in plants. Plant Communications 2, 100168.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhang Y, Xu J, Li R, Ge Y, Li Y, Li R (2023) Plants’ response to abiotic stress: mechanisms and strategies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, 10915.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhao S, Zhang Q, Liu M, Zhou H, Ma C, Wang P (2021) Regulation of plant responses to salt stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, 4609.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhao Z, Shang P, Mohanraju P, Geijsen N (2023) Prime editing: advances and therapeutic applications. Trends in Biotechnology 41, 1000-1012.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Zheng N, Li L, Wang X (2020) Molecular mechanisms, off-target activities, and clinical potentials of genome editing systems. Clinical and Translational Medicine 10, 412-426.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhou J, Peng Z, Long J, Sosso D, Liu B, Eom J-S, Huang S, Liu S, Vera Cruz C, Frommer WB, White FF, Yang B (2015) Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice. The Plant Journal 82, 632-643.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhou X, Liao H, Chern M, Yin J, Chen Y, Wang J, Zhu X, Chen Z, Yuan C, Zhao W, Wang J, Li W, He M, Ma B, Wang J, Qin P, Chen W, Wang Y, Liu J, Qian Y, Wang W, Wu X, Li P, Zhu L, Li S, Ronald PC, Chen X (2018) Loss of function of a rice TPR-domain RNA-binding protein confers broad-spectrum disease resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 3174-3179.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Zhou Y, Xu S, Jiang N, Zhao X, Bai Z, Liu J, Yao W, Tang Q, Xiao G, Lv C, Wang K, Hu X, Tan J, Yang Y (2022) Engineering of rice varieties with enhanced resistances to both blast and bacterial blight diseases via CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Biotechnology Journal 20, 876-885.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zhu C, Bortesi L, Baysal C, Twyman RM, Fischer R, Capell T, Schillberg S, Christou P (2017) Characteristics of genome editing mutations in cereal crops. Trends in Plant Science 22, 38-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zia R, Nawaz MS, Siddique MJ, Hakim S, Imran A (2021) Plant survival under drought stress: implications, adaptive responses, and integrated rhizosphere management strategy for stress mitigation. Microbiological Research 242, 126626.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |