Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Detecting seasonal change of broad-leaved woody canopy leaf area density profile using 3D portable LIDAR imaging

Fumiki Hosoi A and Kenji Omasa A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.

B Corresponding author. Email: aomasa@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp

This paper originates from a presentation at the 1st International Plant Phenomics Symposium, Canberra, Australia, April 2009.

Functional Plant Biology 36(11) 998-1005 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09113
Submitted: 15 May 2009  Accepted: 16 September 2009   Published: 5 November 2009

Abstract

Seasonal change of vertical leaf area density (LAD) profiles of woody canopy broad-leaved trees (Zelkova serrata [Thunberg] Makino) was estimated using 3D portable scanning light detection and ranging (LIDAR) imaging. First, 3D point cloud data for the canopy were collected using a portable LIDAR in spring, summer, autumn and winter. For data collection, the canopy was evenly scanned by the LIDAR from three positions 10 m above the ground. Next, the vertical LAD profile in each season was computed from the LIDAR data using the voxel-based canopy profiling (VCP) method. For the computation, non-photosynthetic tissues were eliminated using the LIDAR data obtained during winter. Influence of leaf inclination angle (LIA) on LAD estimation was corrected by LIA data measured by a high-resolution portable scanning LIDAR. The resultant profiles showed that LAD values tended to increase at the upper canopy from spring to summer and decrease at the middle and lower canopy from summer to autumn. Moreover, LIDAR-derived LIA distributions were compared among different seasons. LIA showed an even distribution in spring but changed to a planophile distribution in summer. In autumn, the angles in the <30° class decreased and those between the 30 and 40°classes increased.

Additional keywords: Japanese zelkova, leaf area index (LAI), leaf inclination angle (LIA), voxel-based canopy profiling (VCP).


References


Barchuk AH, Valiente-Banuet A (2006) Comparative analysis of leaf angle and sclerophylly of Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco on a water deficit gradient. Austral Ecology 31, 882–891.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14, 239–256.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Brandtberg T, Warner TA, Landenberger RE, McGraw JB (2003) Detection and analysis of individual leaf-off tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density lidar data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America. Remote Sensing of Environment 85, 290–303.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Chason JW, Baldocchi DD, Huston MA (1991) A comparison of direct and indirect methods for estimating forest canopy leaf area. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 57, 107–128.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Chen JM, Cihlar J (1995) Plant canopy gap-size analysis theory for improving optical measurements of leaf-area index. Applied Optics 34, 6211–6222.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Comstock JP, Mahall BE (1985) Drought and changes in leaf orientation for two California chaparral shrubs: Ceanothus megacarpus and Ceanothus crassifolius. Oecologia 65, 531–535.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Drouet JL, Moulia B, Bonhomme R (1999) Do changes in the azimuthal distribution of maize leaves over time affect canopy light absorption? Agronomie 19, 281–294.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ehleringer JR , Field CB (1993) ‘Scaling physiological processes – leaf to globe.’ (Academic Press: San Diego)

Eschenbach C, Kappen L (1996) Leaf area index determination in an alder forest: a comparison of three methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 1457–1462.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Graetz RD (1990) Remote sensing of terrestrial ecosystem structure: an ecologist’s pragmatic view. In ‘Remote sensing of biosphere functioning’. (Eds RJ Hobbs, HA Mooney) pp. 5–30. (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Gratani L, Bombelli A (2000) Correlation between leaf age and other leaf traits in three Mediterranean maquis shrub species: Quercus ilex, Phillyrea latifolia and Cistus incanus. Environmental and Experimental Botany 43, 141–153.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gratani L, Ghia E (2002) Changes in morphological and physiological traits during leaf expansion of Arbutus unedo. Environmental and Experimental Botany 48, 51–60.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Harding DJ, Lefsky MA, Parker GG, Blair JB (2001) Laser altimeter canopy height profiles methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests. Remote Sensing of Environment 76, 283–297.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Henning JG, Radtke PJ (2006) Ground-based laser imaging for assessing three-dimensional forest canopy structure. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 72, 1349–1358. open url image1

Holmgren J, Persson Å (2004) Identifying species of individual trees using airborne laser scanner. Remote Sensing of Environment 90, 415–423.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hosoi F, Omasa K (2006) Voxel-based 3-D modeling of individual trees for estimating leaf area density using high-resolution portable scanning lidar. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 44, 3610–3618.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hosoi F, Omasa K (2007) Factors contributing to accuracy in the estimation of the woody canopy leaf-area-density profile using 3D portable lidar imaging. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 3463–3473.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Hosoi F, Omasa K (2009a) Estimating vertical plant area density profile and growth parameters of a wheat canopy at different growth stages using three-dimensional portable lidar imaging. ISRPS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 64, 151–158.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hosoi F , Omasa K (2009 b) Estimating vertical leaf area density profiles of tree canopies using three-dimensional portable lidar imaging. In ‘Proceedings of the ISPRS workshop laser scanning 09, Paris, France’. pp. 152–157. (GITC bv: Lemmer, The Netherlands)

Hosoi F, Yoshimi K, Shimizu Y, Omasa K (2005) 3-D measurement of trees using a portable scanning lidar. Phyton – Annals Rei Botanicae 45, 497–500. open url image1

Hosoi F, Yoshimi K, Akiyama Y, Omasa K (2008) Measurement of woody canopy tree heights using airborne scanning lidar systems: effects of difference in measurement condition of the lidar systems on the accuracy of the tree heights estimation. Eco-Engineering 20, 143–149. open url image1

Hyyppä J, Kelle O, Lehikoinen M, Inkinen M (2001) A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39, 969–975.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Imai K, Shimabe K, Tanaka K (1994) Studies on matter production of edible canna (Canna edulis Ker.). Nihon Sakumotsu Gakkai Kiji 63, 345–351. open url image1

Jonckheere I, Fleck S, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Coppin P, Weiss M, Baret F (2004) Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 121, 19–35.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jones HG (1992) ‘Plants and microclimate.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)

Lang ARG, Yueqin X (1986) Estimation of leaf area index from transmission of direct sunlight in discontinuous canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 37, 229–243.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Larcher W (2001) ‘Physiological plant ecology.’ (Springer: Heidelberg)

Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ (2002) Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience 52, 19–30.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lovell JL, Jupp DLB, Culvenor DS, Coops NC (2003) Using airborne and ground-based ranging lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 29, 607–622. open url image1

Monsi M, Saeki T (1953) Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Japanese Journal of Botany 14, 22–52. open url image1

Monteith JL (1973) ‘Principles of environmental physics.’ (Edward Arnold: London)

Næsset E, Gobakken T, Holmgren J, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J, Maltamo M, Nilsson M, Olsson H, Persson Å, Söderman U (2004) Laser scanning of forest resources: the Nordic experience. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19, 482–499.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nakai Y, Hosoi F, Akiyama Y, Omasa K (2009) Estimation of leaf area density of Zekova trees using airborne and portable scanning lidar systems. Eco-Engineering 21, 9–14. open url image1

Neumann HH, Hartog GD, Shaw RH (1989) Leaf area measurements based on hemispheric photographs and leaf-litter collection in a deciduous forest during autumn leaf-fall. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 45, 325–345.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Norman JM , Campbell GS (1989) Canopy structure. In ‘Plant physiological ecology: field methods and instrumentation’. (Eds RW Pearcy, J Ehleringer, HA Mooney, PW Rundel) pp. 301–325. (Chapman and Hall: London)

Omasa K, Akiyama Y, Ishigami Y, Yoshimi K (2000) 3-D remote sensing of woody canopy heights using a scanning helicopter-borne lidar system with high spatial resolution. Journal of Remote Sensing Society of Japan 20, 394–406. open url image1

Omasa K, Urano Y, Oguma H, Fujinuma Y (2002) Mapping of tree position of Larix leptolepis woods and estimation of diameter at breast height (DBH) and biomass of the trees using range data measured by a portable scanning lidar. Journal of Remote Sensing Society of Japan 22, 550–557. open url image1

Omasa K, Qiu GY, Watanuki K, Yoshimi K, Akiyama Y (2003) Accurate estimation of forest carbon stocks by 3-D remote sensing of individual trees. Environmental Science & Technology 37, 1198–1201.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Omasa K, Hosoi F, Konishi A (2007) 3D lidar imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 881–898.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Omasa K, Hosoi F, Uenishi TM, Shimizu Y, Akiyama Y (2008) Three-dimensional modelling of an urban park and trees by combined airborne and portable on-ground scanning LIDAR remote sensing. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 13, 473–481.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Parker GG, Harding DJ, Berger ML (2004) A portable LIDAR system for rapid determination of forest canopy structure. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 755–767.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Radtke PJ, Bolstad PV (2001) Laser point-quadrat sampling for estimating foliage-height profiles in broad-leaved forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 410–418.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Riaño D, Meier E, Allgöwer B, Chuvieco E, Ustin SL (2003) Modeling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behavior modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment 86, 177–186.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schurr U, Walter A, Rascher U (2006) Functional dynamics of plant growth and photosynthesis – from steady-state to dynamics – from homogeneity to heterogeneity. Plant, Cell & Environment 29, 340–352.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Sinoquet H, Moulia B, Bonhomme R (1991) Estimating the three-dimensional geometry of a maize crop as an input of radiation models: comparison between three-dimensional digitizing and plant profiles. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 55, 233–249.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sinoquet H, Thanisawanyangkura S, Mabrouk H, Kasemsap P (1998) Characterization of the light environment in canopies using 3D digitising and image processing. Annals of Botany 82, 203–212.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sinoquet H, Stephan J, Sonohat G, Lauri PE, Monney Ph (2007) Simple equations to estimate light interception by isolated trees from canopy structure features: assessment with three-dimensional digitized apple trees. New Phytologist 175, 94–106.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Takeda T, Oguma H, Yone Y, Yamagata Y, Fujinuma Y (2005) Comparison of leaf area density measured by laser range finder and stratified clipping method. Phyton – Annals Rei Botanicae 45, 505–510. open url image1

Takeda T, Oguma H, Sano T, Yone Y, Yamagata Y, Fujinuma Y (2008) Estimating the plant area density of a Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi Sarg.) plantation using a ground-based laser scanner. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148, 428–438. open url image1

Tanaka T, Park H, Hattori S (2004) Measurement of forest canopy structure by a laser plane range-finding method improvement of radiative resolution and examples of its application. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 125, 129–142.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Thanisawanyangkura S, Sinoquet H, Rivet P, Cretenet M, Jallas E (1997) Leaf orientation and sunlit leaf area distribution in cotton. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 86, 1–15.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Van der Zande D, Hoet W, Jonckheere I, van Aardt J, Coppin P (2006) Influence of measurement set-up of ground-based LiDAR for derivation of tree structure. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 141, 147–160.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Weiss M, Baret F, Smith GJ, Jonckheere I, Coppin P (2004) Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 121, 37–53.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Welles JM, Norman JM (1991) Instrument for indirect measurement of canopy architecture. Agronomy Journal 83, 818–825. open url image1