Register      Login
ASEG Extended Abstracts ASEG Extended Abstracts Society
ASEG Extended Abstracts
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Geomechanical prestack depth migration of the Kraken 3D (Browse Basin, Australia)

Jarrod Dunne, Matthew Zengerer, Hamish Stein, Stephen Gallagher, Ferudun Kilic, Pramod Kumar and Shiv Pujan Singh

ASEG Extended Abstracts 2018(1) 1 - 8
Published: 2018

Abstract

Conventional pre-stack depth migration applied to the broadband Kraken 3D Marine Seismic Survey was unable to fully resolve short-wavelength velocity anomalies below the sea floor causing obvious imaging problems and limiting depth conversion and amplitude interpretation. Improved imaging was achieved by initiating tomography using a velocity model built by combining geomechanics with rock physics appropriate for shallow carbonates and mudrocks. 3D gravity modelling using high-resolution bathymetry and compaction trends constitutes a new approach for iteratively building a 3D geomechanical model. Effective stress is derived by applying Terzaghi’s principle within an integration (along depth) involving the model bulk and fluid densities and the vertical component of gravity (all of which may vary spatially, using more refined models). Carbonate and mudrock rock physics models, believed to be appropriate for Neogene sediments along much of the NW Shelf of Australia were derived from abundant core and wireline data acquired during the recent IODP Expedition 356. These models provide the necessary link between effective stress and P-wave velocity with Backus averaging handling the “seismic scale” mixing of different lithologies expected in the Kraken 3D area. Kirchhoff prestack depth migration was revisited from archived preprocessed gathers using the geomechanical model combined with Common reflection angle gathers (CRAM) to initiate tomography. CRAM gathers were very effective in the presence of multiples and complex near surface topography to achieve a better update in tomography. Heavy smoothing of velocities was imposed where sequence stratigraphic interpretation suggests only distal mudstone facies. Tomography in shallower layers was then revisited to restore geologically plausible depth structures and deliver a clear improvement in imaging relative to previous processing efforts.

https://doi.org/10.1071/ASEG2018abT7_4C

© ASEG 2018

PDF (1.8 MB) Export Citation

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share via Email