Register      Login
ASEG Extended Abstracts ASEG Extended Abstracts Society
ASEG Extended Abstracts
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Electrical Resistivity Maps of the Australian Lower Crust

Graham Heinson, Stephan Thiel, Kate Robertson, Paul Soeffky and Yohannes Didana

ASEG Extended Abstracts 2018(1) 1 - 5
Published: 2018

Abstract

Crustal silicate rocks at sub-solidus temperatures normally have high electrical resistivities. However, although upper crust is typically > 103 .m, it is not unusual for lower crust to be < 102 .m, and in places < 100 .m. That lower crust (below 10-15 km) can be as electrically conducting as seawater is remarkable, and indicates a substantial and highly-connected mineral, melt or aqueous phase. To date, temporal and spatial mechanisms to give rise to the low resistivity are speculative and poorly constrained by observation and laboratory measurement. We present new maps of the Australian crust resistivity inferred from the regional EM responses. The project addresses the question as to whether the low resistivity is primary in the formation of the crust, or overprint due to melt and fluid migration from a deeper thermal source. A secondary question is how regions of low resistivity from an interconnected phase can be preserved through time-scales of billions of years. Observations are drawn from: the Australian Lithospheric Architecture Magnetotelluric Project (AusLAMP); 2D MT transects; and legacy MT and geomagnetic depth sounding (GDS) data. Our research demonstrates a strong spatial correlation of crustal resistivity with tectonic domains in Australia. Lowest resistivities are often imaged just below the rheological boundary between upper and lower crust at ~10-15 km. Below, low resistivity appears as a broad zone, tens or hundreds of kilometres wide, and tens of kilometres thick; above the boundary, regions of low-resistivity appear as narrower pathways. Such maps are correlated with long-wavelength Bouguer gravity data, suggesting a common origin that changes both density and resistivity.

https://doi.org/10.1071/ASEG2018abP039

© ASEG 2018

PDF (859 KB) Export Citation

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share via Email

View Dimensions