Register      Login
Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science SocietyJournal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science Society
A journal for meteorology, climate, oceanography, hydrology and space weather focused on the southern hemisphere
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Merging weather radar and rain gauges for dryland agriculture

Peter Weir https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1748-5094 A B * and Peter Dahlhaus https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2580-1720 A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for eResearch and Digital Innovation, Federation University Australia, Mount Helen, Vic., Australia.

B Cooperative Research Centre for High Performance Soils, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

* Correspondence to: p.weir@federation.edu.au

Handling Editor: Anthony Rea

Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science 74, ES23023 https://doi.org/10.1071/ES23023
Submitted: 11 October 2023  Accepted: 7 May 2024  Published: 20 June 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Bureau of Meteorology. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

The areal extent of rainfall remains one of the most challenging meteorological variables to model accurately due to its high spatial and temporal variability. Weather radar is a remote sensing instrument that is increasingly used to estimate rainfall by providing unique observations of precipitation events at fine spatial and temporal resolutions, which are difficult to obtain using conventional rain gauge networks. Dense rain gauge networks combined with operational weather radars are widely considered as the most reliable source of rainfall depth estimates. This paper compares the various sources of rainfall data available and explores the benefits of merging radar data with rain gauge data by reviewing the outcomes of a case study of a major agricultural cropping and pasture region. Comparison is made of rainfall measurements obtained from a dense rain gauge network covered by the output from a weather radar installation. We conclude that merging radar data with rain gauge data provides improved resolution of the spatial variability of rainfall, resulting in a significantly improved data source for agricultural water management and hydrological modelling. However, the use of weather radar merged with rain gauge data is generally underrated as a management tool.

Keywords: gridded precipitation, precipitation, radar, radar-rain gauge merging, rain gauges, rainfall, spatial interpolation, weather radar.

References

Agriculture Victoria (2023) Grains and other crops. (Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action) Available at https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/crops-and-horticulture/grains-pulses-and-cereals/grains-and-other-crops [Verified 12 September 2023]

Anagnostou EN, Krajewski WF (1999) Real-time radar rainfall estimation. Part I: algorithm formulation. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 16(2), 189-197.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ansh Srivastava N, Mascaro G (2023) Improving the utility of weather radar for the spatial frequency analysis of extreme precipitation. Journal of Hydrology 624, 129902.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Beesley C, Frost A, Zajaczkowski J (2009) A comparison of the BAWAP and SILO spatially interpolated daily rainfall datasets. In ‘18th World IMACS Congress and MODSIM09 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation’, 13–17 July 2009, Cairns, Qld, Australia. (Eds RS Anderssen, RD Braddock, LTH Newham) pp. 3886–3892. (Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand and International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation) Available at https://mssanz.org.au/modsim09/I13/beesley.pdf

Berndt C, Rabiei E, Haberlandt U (2014) Geostatistical merging of rain gauge and radar data for high temporal resolutions and various station density scenarios. Journal of Hydrology 508, 88-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chappell A, Renzullo LJ, Raupach TH, Haylock M (2013) Evaluating geostatistical methods of blending satellite and gauge data to estimate near real-time daily rainfall for Australia. Journal of Hydrology 493, 105-114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chua Z-W, Kuleshov Y, Watkins A (2020) Evaluation of satellite precipitation estimates over Australia. Remote Sensing 12(4), 678.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chua Z-W, Kuleshov Y, Watkins A, Choy S, Sun Q (2022) A comparison of various correction and blending techniques for creating an improved satellite-gauge rainfall dataset over Australia. Remote Sensing 14, 261.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fu G, Barron O, Charles SP, Donn MJ, Van Niel TG, Hodgson G (2022) Uncertainty of gridded precipitation at local and continent scales: a direct comparison of rainfall from SILO and AWAP in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 58(4), 471-488.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hines B, Qian G, Tordesillas A (2022) Mapping Australia’s precipitation: harnessing the synergies of multi-satellite remote sensing and gauge network data. GIScience & Remote Sensing 59(1), 2084-2110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Goudenhoofdt E, Delobbe L (2009) Evaluation of radar-gauge merging methods for quantitative precipitation estimates. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13(2), 195-203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Grains Research and Development Corporation (2024) Growing regions. (GRDC) Available at https://grdc.com.au/about/our-industry/growing-regions [Verified 24 April 2024]

Hofstra N, Haylock M, New M, Jones P, Frei C (2008) Comparison of six methods for the interpolation of daily, European climate data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 113(D21), D21110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Holzworth DP, Huth NI, deVoil PG, Zurcher EJ, Herrmann NI, McLean G, Chenu K, van Oosterom EJ, Snow V, Murphy C (2014) APSIM – evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environmental Modelling & Software 62, 327-350.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Holzworth D, Huth NI, Fainges J, Brown H, Zurcher E, Cichota R, Verrall S, Herrmann NI, Zheng B, Snow V (2018) APSIM next generation: overcoming challenges in modernising a farming systems model. Environmental Modelling & Software 103, 43-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jackson B, Reichard L, Connell R (2018) Real time calibrated radar rainfall data for improved operational water management and WSUD. In ‘10th International Conference on Water Sensitive Urban Design: Creating water sensitive communities (WSUD 2018 & Hydropolis 2018)’, 12–15 February, 2018, Perth, WA, Australia. pp. 202–211. (Engineers Australia: Barton, ACT, Australia) Available at https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.495145336250869

Jayaweera L, Wasko C, Nathan R, Johnson F (2023) Non-stationarity in extreme rainfalls across Australia. Journal of Hydrology 624, 129872.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jeffrey SJ, Carter JO, Moodie KB, Beswick AR (2001) Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environmental Modelling & Software 16(4), 309-330.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jones D, Wang W, Fawcett R (2009) High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia. Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Journal 58, 233-248.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

King AD, Alexander LV, Donat MG (2013) The efficacy of using gridded data to examine extreme rainfall characteristics: a case study for Australia. International Journal of Climatology 33(10), 2376-2387.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lawrence I, Lin K (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45, 255-268.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nanding N, Rico-Ramirez MA (2019) Precipitation measurement with weather radars. In ‘ICT for Smart Water Systems: Measurements and Data Science’. (Eds A Scozzari, S Mounce, D Han, F Soldovieri, D Solomatine) pp. 235–258. (Springer) 10.1007/698_2019_404

Nashwan MS, Shahid S, Chung E-S, Ahmed K, Song YH (2018) Development of climate-based index for hydrologic hazard susceptibility. Sustainability 10(7), 2182.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Norin L (2015) A quantitative analysis of the impact of wind turbines on operational Doppler weather radar data. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 8(2), 593-609.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Norin L (2017) Wind turbine impact on operational weather radar I/Q data: characterisation and filtering. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 10(5), 1739-1753.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pepler AS, Dowdy AJ, Hope P (2021) The differing role of weather systems in southern Australian rainfall between 1979–1996 and 1997–2015. Climate Dynamics 56, 2289-2302.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Probert ME, Dimes JP, Keating BA, Dalal RC, Strong WM (1998) APSIM’s water and nitrogen modules and simulation of the dynamics of water and nitrogen in fallow systems. Agricultural Systems 56(1), 1-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rauniyar SP, Power SB (2020) The impact of anthropogenic forcing and natural processes on past, present, and future rainfall over Victoria, Australia. Journal of Climate 33(18), 8087-8106.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Saltikoff E, Haase G, Delobbe L, Gaussiat N, Martet M, Idziorek D, Leijnse H, Novák P, Lukach M, Stephan K (2019) OPERA the radar project. Atmosphere 10(6), 320.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Seed A, Pegram G (2001) Using Kriging to infill gaps in radar data due to ground clutter in real-time. In ‘Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Hydrological Applications of Weather Radar’, 19–22 November 2001, Heian-Kaikan, Kyoto, Japan. pp. 73–78. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367299344

Seed A, Siriwardena L, Sun X, Jordan P, Elliott J (2002) On the calibration of Australian weather radars. Technical Report 02/7. (Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology) Available at https://ewater.org.au/archive/crcch/archive/pubs/pdfs/technical200207.pdf

Seed A, Leahy C, Duthie E, Chumchean S (2008) Rainfields: the Australian Bureau of Meteorology system for quantitative precipitation estimation, and it’s use in hydrological modelling. In ‘Proceedings of Water Down Under 2008: Incorporating 31st Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and the 4th International Conference on Water Resources and Environment Research’, 14–17 April 2008, Adelaide, SA, Australia. pp. 661–670. (Engineers Australia)

Seed A, Curtis M, Velasco C (2022) AURA – Operational Radar Rainfields 3. (National Computing Infrastructure Australia) [Dataset] 10.25914/DTTK-H476

Seo B-C, Krajewski WF, Kruger A, Domaszczynski P, Smith JA, Steiner M (2011) Radar-rainfall estimation algorithms of Hydro-NEXRAD. Journal of Hydroinformatics 13(2), 277-291.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Velasco-Forero CA, Sempere-Torres D, Cassiraga EF, Jaime gómez-Hernández J (2009) A non-parametric automatic blending methodology to estimate rainfall fields from rain gauge and radar data. Advances in Water Resources 32(7), 986-1002.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Verley A (2022) Wimmera thunderstorms. In Victorian Country Hour, 15 March 2022, 12:00 hours AEST. (Ed. R Johns) (ABC Radio, Australian Broadcasting Commission) [Broadcast]

Wimmera Catchment Management Authority (2023) Land. In ‘Wimmera Regional Catchment Strategy’. (Victoria State Government) Available at https://wimmera.rcs.vic.gov.au/themes/land/ [Verified 12 September 2023]

Wimmera Catchment Management Authority (2024) West Wimmera – Region quick stats/Climate. (Wimmera CMA) Available at https://wimmera.rcs.vic.gov.au/local-areas/west-wimmera/ [Verified 7 February 2024]

Wesson SM, Pegram GGS (2006) Improved radar rainfall estimation at ground level. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 6(3), 323-342.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |