Offshore structures – why all offshore facilities should have a demanning requirement

Abstract

Most offshore structure design codes focus on setting appropriate safety factors to achieve an acceptable annual level of risk. Recent work by Atkins SNC-Lavalin, together with a large number of operators in Australian waters and the North Sea, has discovered that a large number of aging assets are implementing a demanning requirement to limit the risk of platform collapse to personnel, due to changes in loading or degradation of the structure. This work has shown there are two risk scenarios that should drive this requirement. The first scenario which is intended by the codes in limiting the overall annual risk. The second is to limit the collapse risk associated with a known forecast storm, as the level of risk from helicopter demanning is much lower. For all the older offshore fixed and permanently mooring floating structures assessed for a risk level considered acceptable for a forecast storm, this risk level would govern the sea-state demanning criteria. For recently installed facilities that are compliant with current standards, the findings were the same: that all facilities should have a demanning requirement. The level of this demanning sea-state limit has been shown to be lower than expected and is likely to occur only once in the asset’s life; therefore, the cost implications of implementing demanning procedures are minor. This paper presents the basis and range of findings for calculating the risks associated with an annual occurrence and an ‘in a forecast storm’ risk. Further, this paper proposes acceptable demanning limits for facilities designed to current and historical design codes.