Social media use in the Australian energy and resources sectors
Craig A. StyanFaculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Mawson Lakes Campus University of South Australia, GPO Box 2941, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. Email: c.styan@ucl.ac.uk
The APPEA Journal 58(2) 617-620 https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ17152
Accepted: 27 February 2018 Published: 28 May 2018
Abstract
Social media is becoming ubiquitous, but may not always be an effective way for companies to interact with their stakeholders. This paper reports the results of ongoing assessments of social media use in the Australian energy and resource sectors, starting from 2013. Nearly all energy and mining companies had publicly accessible websites but, although increasing, social media use is (still) relatively limited compared with other industries. LinkedIn (with a recruitment focus) was the social media channel most commonly adopted across the extractive sectors, although Twitter and YouTube are increasingly being adopted. Larger companies use more channels, post more and have more followers. In contrast, even small environmental and community groups frequently used a range of social media. Although this may suggest social media should be a place to engage such groups in dialogue, other recent studies suggest that, in practice, social media platforms are often difficult venues to do this, not least because companies cannot control the directions of conversations. For example, customers of utility companies frequently use social media to bypass official grievance mechanisms, which, over time, has apparently led to demand-driven increases in resourcing needed to deal with this. In addition to providing an industry-wide benchmark of social media use, these surveys provide a basis for comparison with other industries to understand what role social media could have in better engaging stakeholders associated with the extractive sectors.
Keywords: communications, corporate social responsibility, Facebook, LinkedIn, social licence to operate, stakeholder engagement, Twitter, YouTube.
Craig Styan has a PhD in Environmental Science from the University of Adelaide and has 20 years’ experience working across southern Australia, including time working in the oil and gas sector. Craig is a Senior Lecturer at University College London (UCL) and lead of the UCL Engineering in Australia group, based in Adelaide at the University of South Australia Mawson Lakes campus. As well as natural resource development and sustainable management, Craig teaches a unit on company-stakeholder relations (SERAG018 Social Licensing) at UCL. |
References
Australian Government (2015). Register of environmental organisations. Department of Environment and Energy. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/about-us/business/tax/register-environmental-organisations [verified 14 April 2015].Australian Stock Exchange (2013). Energy & utilities sector profile. Available at http://www.asx.com.au/documents/professionals/ASX_Energy_and_Utilities.pdf [verified 1 May 2013].
Australian Stock Exchange (2014). Metals and mining sector profile. Available at http://www.asx.com.au/documents/products/asx-metals-and-mining-sector-profile.pdf [verified 1 May 2014].
Australian Stock Exchange (2017a). Energy sector profile. Available at https://www.asx.com.au/documents/products/ASX-42800-Energy-Sector-Profile.pdf [verified 2 April 2017].
Australian Stock Exchange (2017b). Metals and mining sector profile. Available at https://www.asx.com.au/documents/resources/00180_MetalsMiningSector_FactSheet_web.pdf [verified 2 April 2017].
DiStaso, M. W., McCorkindale, T., and Wright, D. K. (2011). How public relations executives perceive and measure the impact of social media in their organizations. Public Relations Review 37, 325–328.
| How public relations executives perceive and measure the impact of social media in their organizations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hendriks, C. M., Duus, S., and Ercan, S. A. (2016). Performing politics on social media: the dramaturgy of an environmental controversy on Facebook. Environmental Politics 25, 1102–1125.
| Performing politics on social media: the dramaturgy of an environmental controversy on Facebook.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kim, D., Kim, J. H., and Nam, Y. (2014). How does industry use social networking sites? An analysis of corporate dialogic uses of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and LinkedIn by industry type. Quality & Quantity 48, 2605–2614.
| How does industry use social networking sites? An analysis of corporate dialogic uses of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and LinkedIn by industry type.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lin, X., Spence, P. R., Sellnow, T. L., and Lachlan, K. A. (2016). Crisis communication, learning and responding: best practices in social media. Computers in Human Behavior 65, 601–605.
| Crisis communication, learning and responding: best practices in social media.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shearer, E., and Gottfried, J. (2017). News use across social media platforms 2017. Pew Research Institute: Washington, DC. Available at http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2017/09/13163032/PJ_17.08.23_socialMediaUpdate_FINAL.pdf [verified 2 February 2018].
Sommerfeldt, E. J., Kent, M. L., and Taylor, M. (2012). Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise? Public Relations Review 38, 303–312.
| Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Styan, C. A., Trott, W., Bartley, C., Sharpe, O., Wu, H., Tubb, A., and Simons, D. (2015). Adoption of social media in the Australian energy and resources sectors. In ‘SRMINING2015 – 3rd International Conference on Social Responsibility in Mining’, 4–6 November 2015, Antofagasta, Chile. (Eds D Kemp, C Parra.) pp. 1–10 (Gecamin: Chile.)
