Improving environmental performance through ISO 14001
Max GoodwinS2V Consulting.
The APPEA Journal 56(2) 540-540 https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ15046
Published: 2016
Abstract
The International Standard for Environmental Management Systems, ISO 14001 (the Standard), has been around for nearly 20 years and 2015 saw its third revision. Various research papers in the early 2000s showed that adoption of—and certification to—the ISO 14001 standard did not have any significant bearing on organisations’ environmental performance, as measured in terms of the frequency of incidents and legal compliance.
In this latest revision it is clear that concerns raised about the Standard have been taken on board, and it now provides for a more rigorous and effective environmental management system, which will ensure greater focus on the actual outcomes of the system, rather than the paperwork and procedures that are often the focus. New areas of focus include: environmental performance evaluation, leadership and commitment, life-cycle thinking, and addressing the needs of external stakeholders.
Through experience gained over 20 years of working with the ISO 14001 standard in the oil and gas industry—including 10 years as a third-party certifier—the author discusses the benefits of adopting the revised ISO 14001 standard, and incorporates case study examples (from Australian oil and gas operators) of best practice as well as some of the pitfalls to avoid. In addition, the paper explores the potential for Australian oil and gas regulators to apply a ‘lighter touch’ to the regulation of ISO14001 certified operators.
Max Goodwin has 20 years of experience in the field of management system consulting, certification, and verification, beginning in 1996 with Amerada Hess, who became the first ISO 14001 certified exploration and production company in the UKCS. His career includes a leadership role with an accredited certification body, managing and conducting third-party audits, verifications, and training assignments worldwide for clients in the oil and gas, chemical, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, medical devices, construction, manufacturing, and airport sectors. He is BSc and MSc qualified in environmental management, and has been accreditation-body approved as an ISO 14001 Lead Auditor and as Lead Verifier under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and Eco-Management and Audit Scheme. Max is General Manager of S2V Consulting Pty Ltd and is based in Perth. |
References
Crossthwaite, J., 2015—Is ISO 14001 effective? Masters research short thesis, October 2015, The University of Queensland. Accessed 16th February 2016. <http://www.eianz.org/document/item/3158>.Dahlström, K. and Skea, J., 2002—Modernising regulation: the role of environmental management systems. Report of the Final Workshop held at the Policy Studies Institute (PSI) Conference Centre, London, England, 18 September 2002. London: Policy Studies Institute.
Federal Register Of Legislation, 2016—Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Environment) Regulations 2009. Accessed 16th February 2016. <https://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2014C00210>.
ISO, 2013—ISO/TC 207/SC1: environmental management systems. Accessed 17th February 2016. <www.iso.org/iso/tc207sc1home>.
ISO, 2015—ISO survey. Accessed 17th February 2016. <http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/certification/iso-survey.htm?certificate=ISO14001&countrycode=#standardpick>.
NOPSMEA, 2016—Environment plan content requirements. Guidance note N04750–GN1344, revision 2, September 2015. Accessed 18th February 2016. <http://www.nopsema.gov.au/assets/Guidance-notes/N-04750-GN1344-Environment-Plan-Content-Requirements-Guidance-Note-28-February-2014.pdf>.
OSPAR, 2003—OSPAR recommendation 2003/5 to promote the use and implementation of environmental management systems by the offshore industry. Annex 16, ref. A-7.9b. Accessed 17th February 2016. <www.ospar.org/documents?d=32720>.
UKAS, 2016—EA recognises environmental management systems. Accessed 17th February 2016. <https://www.ukas.com/news/ea-recognises-environmental-management-systems/>.
