Register      Login
Environmental Chemistry Environmental Chemistry Society
Environmental problems - Chemical approaches
RESEARCH FRONT

Copper toxicity to Folsomia candida in different soils: a comparison between nano and conventional formulations

Joana Neves A D , Diogo N. Cardoso A , Catarina Malheiro A , Melanie Kah B , Amadeu M. V. M. Soares A , Frederick J. Wrona C and Susana Loureiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-9623 A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biology and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

B University of Auckland, School of Environment, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

C Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4.

D Corresponding authors. Email: jtneves@ua.pt; sloureiro@ua.pt

Environmental Chemistry 16(6) 419-429 https://doi.org/10.1071/EN19061
Submitted: 16 February 2019  Accepted: 23 May 2019   Published: 1 July 2019

Environmental context. Nanotechnology has great potential for managing agricultural plant disease. This study compares effects of various nano and conventional copper formulations on Collembola Folsomia candida, a model arthropod often used to test soil pollutants. Although toxicity varied between formulations, with a nanopesticide showing one of the highest toxicities, the differences were mainly due to the active copper compound rather than its nano formulation.

Abstract. Nanotechnology has recently become a major asset in agricultural practices owing to the improvement and provision of solutions for plant disease management, especially in the form of nanopesticides. These products are considered as one of the main direct sources of nanomaterials in terrestrial ecosystems, and for that reason, it is essential to understand and evaluate their behaviour and toxicity in the environment. In addition, the panoply of similar compounds makes it difficult to accurately evaluate if different formulations may induce different effects on non-target organisms. We aim to compare the toxicity and bioavailability of different copper formulations (nano and non-nano) applied to the soil using the model organism Folsomia candida. Reproduction tests were performed in two different soils (Lufa 2.1 and 2.2) with two equilibrium times after spiking (0 and 48 h). Depending on the copper form present in the formulation, the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) values of the non-nano pesticides varied from 274 mg Cu kg−1 in Champion® to 3030 mg Cu kg−1 in Cupravit® in Lufa 2.2 and 48 h equilibrium. The nano formulation displayed one of the highest toxicities to collembolans, with an EC50 of 156 mg Cu kg−1. Regarding the soil type, a higher toxicity in Lufa 2.1 was observed probably related to the soil characteristics, namely lower pH and lower organic content, which increase the metal solubility and consequently the bioavailability. The only exception was the nanopesticide Kocide 3000®, whose toxicity was higher in Lufa 2.2. This study emphasises the importance of understanding the links between metal bioavailability and toxicity to support the more robust environmental risk assessment of different Cu fungicide formulations.

Additional keywords: bioavailability, fungicides, nanopesticides, porewater, soil invertebrates.


References

Adeleye AS, Conway JR, Perez T, Rutten P, Keller AA (2014). Influence of Extracellular Polymeric Substances on the Long-Term Fate, Dissolution, and Speciation of Copper-Based Nanoparticles. Environmental Science & Technology 48, 12561–12568.
Influence of Extracellular Polymeric Substances on the Long-Term Fate, Dissolution, and Speciation of Copper-Based NanoparticlesCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alloway BJ (Ed.) (2013). ‘Heavy metals in soils.’ (Springer; Dordrecht)

Anjali CH, Sudheer Khan S, Margulis-Goshen K, Magdassi S, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N (2010). Formulation of water-dispersible nanopermethrin for larvicidal applications. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 73, 1932–1936.
Formulation of water-dispersible nanopermethrin for larvicidal applicationsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20833431PubMed |

Ardestani MM, van Gestel CAM (2013a). Dynamic bioavailability of copper in soil estimated by uptake and elimination kinetics in the springtail Folsomia candida. Ecotoxicology 22, 308–318.
Dynamic bioavailability of copper in soil estimated by uptake and elimination kinetics in the springtail Folsomia candidaCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23229135PubMed |

Ardestani MM, van Gestel CAM (2013b). Using a toxicokinetics approach to explain the effect of soil pH on cadmium bioavailability to Folsomia candida. Environmental Pollution 180, 122–130.
Using a toxicokinetics approach to explain the effect of soil pH on cadmium bioavailability to Folsomia candidaCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23747820PubMed |

Ardestani MM, van Gestel CAM (2013c). Toxicodynamics of Copper and Cadmium in Folsomia candida exposed to simulated soil solutions. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 32, 2746–2754.
Toxicodynamics of Copper and Cadmium in Folsomia candida exposed to simulated soil solutionsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23955663PubMed |

Conway JR, Adeleye AS, Gardea-Torresdey J, Keller AA (2015). Aggregation, Dissolution, and Transformation of Copper Nanoparticles in Natural Waters. Environmental Science & Technology 49, 2749–2756.
Aggregation, Dissolution, and Transformation of Copper Nanoparticles in Natural WatersCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Barros Amorim MJ, Römbke J, Schallnaß H-J, Soares AMVM (2005). Effect of soil properties and aging on the toxicity of copper for Enchytraeus albidus, Enchytraeus luxuriosus, and Folsomia candida. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 24, 1875–1885.
Effect of soil properties and aging on the toxicity of copper for Enchytraeus albidus, Enchytraeus luxuriosus, and Folsomia candidaCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Oliveira-Filho EC, Lopes RM, Paumgartten FJR (2004). Comparative study on the susceptibility of freshwater species to copper-based pesticides. Chemosphere 56, 369–374.
Comparative study on the susceptibility of freshwater species to copper-based pesticidesCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15183999PubMed |

Díez-Ortiz M, Giska I, Groot M, Borgman EM, Van Gestel CAM (2010). Influence of soil properties on molybdenum uptake and elimination kinetics in the earthworm Eisenia andrei. Chemosphere 80, 1036–1043.
Influence of soil properties on molybdenum uptake and elimination kinetics in the earthworm Eisenia andreiCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20674662PubMed |

Elmer W, White JC (2018). The Future of Nanotechnology in Plant Pathology. Annual Review of Phytopathology 56, 111–133.
The Future of Nanotechnology in Plant PathologyCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30149792PubMed |

European Commission (2018). Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2018/1981 of 13 December 2018 renewing the approval of the active substances copper compounds, as candidates for substitution, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/201. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018R1981&rid=3 [verified 12 June 2019]

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Arena M, Auteri D, Barmaz S, Bellisai G, Brancato A, Brocca D, Bura L, Byers H, Chiusolo A, Court Marques D, Crivellente F, De Lentdecker C, Egsmose M, Erdos Z, Fait G, Ferreira L, Goumenou M, Greco L, Ippolito A, Istace F, Jarrah S, Kardassi D, Leuschner R, Lythgo C, Magrans JO, Medina P, Miron I, Molnar T, Nougadere A, Padovani L, Parra Morte JM, Pedersen R, Reich H, Sacchi A, Santos M, Serafimova R, Sharp R, Stanek A, Streissl F, Sturma J, Szentes C, Tarazona J, Terron A, Theobald A, Vagenende B, Verani A, Villamar‐Bouza L (2018). Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance copper compounds copper(I), copper(II) variants namely copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, tribasic copper sulfate, copper(I) oxide, Bordeaux mixture. EFSA Journal 16, e05152
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance copper compounds copper(I), copper(II) variants namely copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, tribasic copper sulfate, copper(I) oxide, Bordeaux mixtureCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frankart C, Eullaffroy P, Vernet G (2002). Photosynthetic responses of Lemna minor exposed to xenobiotics, copper, and their combinations. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 53, 439–445.
Photosynthetic responses of Lemna minor exposed to xenobiotics, copper, and their combinationsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12485590PubMed |

Helling B, Reinecke SA, Reinecke AJ (2000). Effects of the Fungicide Copper Oxychloride on the Growth and Reproduction of Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 46, 108–116.
Effects of the Fungicide Copper Oxychloride on the Growth and Reproduction of Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta)Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10806001PubMed |

Herbert IN, Svendsen C, Hankard PK, Spurgeon DJ (2004). Comparison of instantaneous rate of population increase and critical-effect estimates in Folsomia candida exposed to four toxicants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 57, 175–183.
Comparison of instantaneous rate of population increase and critical-effect estimates in Folsomia candida exposed to four toxicantsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14759664PubMed |

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2007). Water quality – Determination of selected elements by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). ISO 11885. Geneva, Switzerland.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2014). Soil quality ­– Inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil contaminants. ISO 11267. Geneva, Switzerland.

Kah M, Hofmann T (2014). Nanopesticide research: Current trends and future priorities. Environment International 63, 224–235.
Nanopesticide research: Current trends and future prioritiesCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24333990PubMed |

Kah M, Kookana RS, Gogos A, Bucheli TD (2018). A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues. Nature Nanotechnology 13, 677–684.
A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analoguesCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29736032PubMed |

Kiaune L, Singhasemanon N, Whitacre DM (2011). Pesticidal copper (I) oxide: environmental fate and aquatic toxicity. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 213, 1–26.
Pesticidal copper (I) oxide: environmental fate and aquatic toxicityCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21541846PubMed |

Kookana RS, Boxall ABA, Reeves PT, Ashauer R, Beulke S, Chaudhry Q, Cornelis G, Fernandes TF, Gan J, Kah M, Lynch I, Ranville J, Sinclair C, Spurgeon D, Tiede K, Van den Brink PJ (2014). Nanopesticides: Guiding Principles for Regulatory Evaluation of Environmental Risks. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 62, 4227–4240.
Nanopesticides: Guiding Principles for Regulatory Evaluation of Environmental RisksCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24754346PubMed |

Lehmann RG, Harter RD (1984). Assessment of Copper-Soil Bond Strength by Desorption Kinetics. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 769–772.
Assessment of Copper-Soil Bond Strength by Desorption KineticsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2016). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2. Test No. 232: Collembolan Reproduction Test in Soil (OECD: Paris). Available at10.1787/9789264264601-EN [verified 29 May 2019]

Pérez-de-Luque A, Rubiales D (2009). Nanotechnology for parasitic plant control. Pest Management Science 65, 540–545.
Nanotechnology for parasitic plant controlCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19255973PubMed |

Saini P, Gopal M, Kumar R, Srivastava C (2014). Development of pyridalyl nanocapsule suspension for efficient management of tomato fruit and shoot borer (Helicoverpa armigera). Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B 49, 344–351.
Development of pyridalyl nanocapsule suspension for efficient management of tomato fruit and shoot borer (Helicoverpa armigera)Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sandifer RD, Hopkin SP (1996). Effects of pH on the toxicity of cadmium, copper, lead and zinc to Folsomia candida Willem, 1902 (Collembola) in a standard laboratory test system. Chemosphere 33, 2475–2486.
Effects of pH on the toxicity of cadmium, copper, lead and zinc to Folsomia candida Willem, 1902 (Collembola) in a standard laboratory test systemCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8976058PubMed |

Smit CE, Van Gestel CAM (1996). Comparison of the toxicity of zinc for the springtail Folsomia candida in artificially contaminated and polluted field soils. Applied Soil Ecology 3, 127–136.
Comparison of the toxicity of zinc for the springtail Folsomia candida in artificially contaminated and polluted field soilsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smit CE, Van Gestel CAM (1998). Effects of soil type, prepercolation, and ageing on bioaccumulation and toxicity of zinc for the springtail Folsomia candida. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 17, 1132–1141.
Effects of soil type, prepercolation, and ageing on bioaccumulation and toxicity of zinc for the springtail Folsomia candidaCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995). ‘Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research.’ (WH Freeman: New York, NY)

Waalewijn-Kool PL, Rupp S, Lofts S, Svendsen C, van Gestel CAM (2014). Effect of soil organic matter content and pH on the toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles to Folsomia candida. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 108, 9–15.
Effect of soil organic matter content and pH on the toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles to Folsomia candidaCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25038266PubMed |

Walker GW, Kookana RS, Smith NE, Kah M, Doolette CL, Reeves PT, Lovell W, Anderson DJ, Turney TW, Navarro DA (2018). Ecological Risk Assessment of Nano-enabled Pesticides: A Perspective on Problem Formulation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66, 6480–6486.
Ecological Risk Assessment of Nano-enabled Pesticides: A Perspective on Problem FormulationCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28812885PubMed |

Widarto TH, Krogh PH, Forbes VE (2007). Nonylphenol stimulates fecundity but not population growth rate (λ) of Folsomia candida. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 67, 369–377.
Nonylphenol stimulates fecundity but not population growth rate (λ) of Folsomia candidaCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17189650PubMed |

Wightwick AM, Mollah MR, Partington DL, Allinson G (2008). Copper Fungicide Residues in Australian Vineyard Soils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56, 2457–2464.
Copper Fungicide Residues in Australian Vineyard SoilsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18321047PubMed |

Xu J, Wang Y, Luo Y-M, Song J, Ke X (2009). Effects of copper, lead and zinc in soil on egg development and hatching of Folsomia candida. Insect Science 16, 51–55.
Effects of copper, lead and zinc in soil on egg development and hatching of Folsomia candidaCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhao L, Ortiz C, Adeleye AS, Hu Q, Zhou H, Huang Y, Keller AA (2016). Metabolomics to Detect Response of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) to Cu(OH)2 Nanopesticides: Oxidative Stress Response and Detoxification Mechanisms. Environmental Science & Technology 50, 9697–9707.
Metabolomics to Detect Response of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) to Cu(OH)2 Nanopesticides: Oxidative Stress Response and Detoxification MechanismsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhao L, Hu Q, Huang Y, Keller AA (2017). Response at Genetic, Metabolic, and Physiological Levels of Maize (Zea mays) Exposed to a Cu(OH)2 Nanopesticide. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5, 8294–8301.
Response at Genetic, Metabolic, and Physiological Levels of Maize (Zea mays) Exposed to a Cu(OH)2 NanopesticideCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |