Analysis of trichloroethene vapour in soil-gas samples using solid-sorbent tubes with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
Candice M. Duncan A C , Jon Mainhagu A , Dan Lin A and Mark L. Brusseau A BA Soil, Water and Environmental Science Department, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
B Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences Department, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: cduncan1@umd.edu
Environmental Chemistry 14(8) 495-501 https://doi.org/10.1071/EN17161
Submitted: 19 September 2017 Accepted: 7 November 2017 Published: 16 March 2018
Environmental context. Chlorinated chemicals are priority contaminants that pose significant risk to human health, and require state-of-the-art sampling techniques for varying matrices. A soil-gas sampling method was developed for the quantification of vapours of trichloroethene, a major chlorinated contaminant, present just above the groundwater zone. The method addresses sampling times, volumes and low-level trichloroethene concentrations.
Abstract. A sampling method for determining vapour concentrations of chlorinated contaminants, specifically trichloroethene (TCE), present in the vadose zone has been developed, and was applied at the Tucson International Airport Area Superfund site. The method, modified from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Manual of Analytical Methods # 1022 for ambient-air sampling of TCE, is targeted to situations requiring cost-effective sample collection, particularly for cases in which concentrations are at or below maximum contaminant. In our method, TCE vapour is sampled using a solid-sorbent tube. Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry is used to confirm and quantify the presence of TCE. The results of laboratory tests demonstrate a maximum TCE vapour load of ~22 mg before breakthrough to the secondary sorbent-tube section, and an extraction efficiency of ~97%. The results of a performance comparison test conducted in the field show that concentrations obtained with the sorbent tube samplers (~5 μg/L) are similar to those obtained with the use of standard summa canisters (~3 μg/L). The quantitative detection limit for the new method was 0.03 μg/L under the operative conditions, a significant improvement on current analytical methods. The results indicate that use of the sorbent-tube method will be effective for vapour sample collection at sites contaminated with volatile organic compounds, particularly in characterising low concentrations for applications such as assessing groundwater contamination risk and the need for remedial action via soil vapour extraction or other methods.
Additional keywords: soil gas, trichloroethene, vapour phase, VOC sampling method.
References
[1] S. Zhang, G. Mao, J. Crittenden, X. Liu, H. Du, Groundwater remediation from the past to the future: A bibliometric analysis Water Res. 2017, 119, 114.| Groundwater remediation from the past to the future: A bibliometric analysisCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXms1Wrtrc%3D&md5=249eafd242b3bcff97764887e302acd4CAS |
[2] M. L. Brusseau, K. C. Carroll, M. J. Truex, D. J. Becker, Characterization and remediation of chlorinated volatile organic contaminants in the vadose zone Vadose Zone J. 2013, 12, 1.
| Characterization and remediation of chlorinated volatile organic contaminants in the vadose zoneCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXntV2it74%3D&md5=cb3f24cb1ae82246073908dd3d05680dCAS |
[3] T. McHugh, P. Loll, B. Eklund, Recent advances in vapor intrusion site investigations J. Environ. Manage. 2017, 204, 783.
| Recent advances in vapor intrusion site investigationsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXjtlGhsLo%3D&md5=f6bd72091941cf5867b59e60262b60a5CAS |
[4] C. Morrison, Innovative Methods for Characterizing Chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds in the Vadose 2014 Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
[5] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Trichloroethylene, Method 1022. (2) 1994. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/1022.pdf [verified 9 January 2018].
[6] Environmental Protection Agency, Sampling Method for Volatile Organic Compounds (SMVOC) 1996. Available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/5000.pdf [verified 9 January 2018].
[7] Environmental Protection Agency, Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) 1996. Available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/8260b.pdf [verified 9 January 2018].
[8] ASTM D7663-12 Standard Practice for Active Soil Gas Sampling in the Vadose Zone for Vapor Intrusion Evaluations (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA). Available at https://doi.org/10.1520/D7663-12 [verified 9 January 2018].
[9] Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Site Investigation Guidance Manual 2014. Available at https://legacy.azdeq.gov/environ/waste/download/SI_Guidance_Manual_Final.pdf [verified 9 January 2018].
[10] D. Grosse, J. McKernan, Passive Samplers for the Investigations of Air Quality: Method Description, Implementation, and Comparison to Alternative Sampling Methods, EPA/600/R-14–434 2014 (US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC). Available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P100MK4Z.pdf [verified 9 January 2018].
[11] Environmental Protection Agency, Sampling of Principal Organic Hazardous Constituents from Combustion Sources using Tedlar Bags 1996. Available at https://archive.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/testmethods/web/html/under.html [verified 9 January 2018].
[12] Environmental Protection Agency, Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, Second Edition. Compendium Method TO-15 Determination Of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) In Air Collected In Specially-Prepared Canisters And Analyzed By Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) 1999. Available at https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/airtox/to-15r.pdf [verified 9 January 2018].
[13] Environmental Protection Agency, Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, Second Edition. Compendium Method TO-17 Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Using Active Sampling onto Sorbent Tubes 1999. Available at https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/airtox/to-17r.pdf [verified 9 January 2018].
[14] M. Elsner, G. Imfeld, Compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) of micropollutants in the environment — current developments and future challenges Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 41, 60.
| Compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) of micropollutants in the environment — current developments and future challengesCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xnslant78%3D&md5=772fd3863c94f16225b875521baeb4cfCAS |
[15] D. Bouchard, D. Hunkeler, Solvent-based dissolution method to sample gas-phase volatile organic compounds for compound-specific isotope analysis J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1325, 16.
| Solvent-based dissolution method to sample gas-phase volatile organic compounds for compound-specific isotope analysisCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvFOhu73O&md5=cc34db52bfae530f3b475a94eb90fab3CAS |
[16] Compound Specific Isotope Analysis factsheet (Interstate Technology Regulatory Council). Available at http://www.itrcweb.org/documents/team_emd/CSIA_Fact_Sheet.pdf [verified 9 January 2018].
[17] L. Beckley, T. McHugh, P. Philip, Utility of compound-specific isotope analysis for vapor intrusion investigations Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 2016, 36, 31.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XitFamsr%2FL&md5=2d861eef5df11f70c64dfa62996f0389CAS |
[18] M. Harper, Novel sorbents for sampling organic vapours Analyst (Lond.) 1994, 119, 65.
| Novel sorbents for sampling organic vapoursCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXosFSnug%3D%3D&md5=9aae8a8146b7124d50315af622e7573cCAS |
[19] National Research Council, Alternatives for Managing the Nation’s Complex Contaminated Groundwater Sites 2013 (National Academies Press: Washington, DC).
[20] T. Karanfil, S. A. Dastgheib, Trichloroethylene adsorption by fibrous and granular activated carbons: aqueous phase, gas phase, and water vapor adsorption studies Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 5834.
| Trichloroethylene adsorption by fibrous and granular activated carbons: aqueous phase, gas phase, and water vapor adsorption studiesCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXnvVKltb4%3D&md5=8b60f4f9552a13fb06b2b4196365aa79CAS |
[21] S. A. Leake, R. T. Hanson, Distribution and Movement of Trichloroethylene in Ground Water in the Tucson Area, Arizona; US Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigation Report 86–4313 1987. Available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1986/4313/report.pdf [verified 9 January 2018].
[22] P. F. Sanders, I. Hers, Vapor intrusion in homes over gasoline-contaminated ground water in Stafford, New Jersey Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 2006, 26, 63.
| Vapor intrusion in homes over gasoline-contaminated ground water in Stafford, New JerseyCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xitleisb0%3D&md5=ab09aadcf0503d54d1d4599ec221d8a9CAS |
