Urban archaeological investigations using surface 3D Ground Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography methods
Nikos Papadopoulos 1 Apostolos Sarris 2 Myeong-Jong Yi 1 3 Jung-Ho Kim 11 Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), Mineral Resources Research Division, Exploration Geophysics and Mining Engineering Department, 92 Gwahang-no, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-350, South Korea.
2 Laboratory of Geophysical-Satellite Remote Sensing & Archaeo-environment, Institute for Mediterranean Studies, Foundation of Research and Technology-Hellas, P.O. Box 119, Rethymnon, 74100 Crete, Greece.
3 Corresponding author. Email: muse@kigam.re.kr
Exploration Geophysics 40(1) 56-68 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08107
Submitted: 15 October 2008 Published: 27 February 2009
Abstract
Ongoing and extensive urbanisation, which is frequently accompanied with careless construction works, may threaten important archaeological structures that are still buried in the urban areas. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) methods are most promising alternatives for resolving buried archaeological structures in urban territories. In this work, three case studies are presented, each of which involves an integrated geophysical survey employing the surface three-dimensional (3D) ERT and GPR techniques, in order to archaeologically characterise the investigated areas.
The test field sites are located at the historical centres of two of the most populated cities of the island of Crete, in Greece. The ERT and GPR data were collected along a dense network of parallel profiles. The subsurface resistivity structure was reconstructed by processing the apparent resistivity data with a 3D inversion algorithm. The GPR sections were processed with a systematic way, applying specific filters to the data in order to enhance their information content. Finally, horizontal depth slices representing the 3D variation of the physical properties were created. The GPR and ERT images significantly contributed in reconstructing the complex subsurface properties in these urban areas. Strong GPR reflections and high-resistivity anomalies were correlated with possible archaeological structures. Subsequent excavations in specific places at both sites verified the geophysical results. The specific case studies demonstrated the applicability of ERT and GPR techniques during the design and construction stages of urban infrastructure works, indicating areas of archaeological significance and guiding archaeological excavations before construction work.
Key words: archaeological investigation, ground penetrating radar, 3D resistivity tomography, urban areas.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Byzantine Archaeological Service of Rethymno and the Port Organization of Heraklion. This work was also supported by the Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources funded by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy of Korea. The authors would like to thank Dr Lindsay Thomas and two anonymous reviewers for their comments that improved the quality of the manuscript significantly.
Athanasiou, E., Tsourlos, P., Vargemezis, G., Papazachos, C., and Tsokas, G.N., 2007, Non-destructive DC resistivity surveying using flat-base electrodes: Near Surface Geophysics 5, 263–272.
Drahor, M. G., 2006, Integrated geophysical studies in the upper part of Sardis archaeological site, Turkey: Journal of Applied Geophysics 59, 205–223.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goodman, D., 1994, Ground-pentrating radar simulation in engineering and archaeology: Geophysics 59, 224–232.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sarris, A., Dunn, R. K., Rife, J. L., Papadopoulos, N., Kokkinou, E., and Mundigler, C., 2007, Geological and geophysical investigations in the Roman cemetery at Kenchreai (Korinthia), Greece: Archaeological Prospection 14, 1–23.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tsokas, G.N., Giannopoulos, A., Tsourlos, P., Vargemezis, G., Tealby, J.M., Sarris, A., Papazachos, C.B., and Savopoulou, T., 1994, A Large Scale Geophysical Survey in the Archaeological Site of Europos (northern Greece): Journal of Applied Geophysics 32, 85–98.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tsokas, G. N., Tsourlos, P. I., Vargemezis, G., and Novack, M., 2008, Non-destructive Electrical Resistivity Tomography for Indoor Investigation: the Case of Kapnikarea Church in Athens: Archaeological Prospection 15, 47–61.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tsourlos, P., and Ogilvy, R., 1999, An algorithm for the 3-D Inversion of Tomographic Resistivity and Induced Polarization data: Preliminary Results: Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society 2, 30–45.
Vafidis, A., Economou, N., Ganiatsos, Y., Manakou, M., Poulioudis, G., Sourlas, G., Vrontaki, E., Sarris, A., Guy, M., and Kalpaxis, Th., 2005, Integrated archaeological studies at ancient Itanos (Greece): Archaeological Science 32, 1023–1036.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vaughan, C. J., 1986, Ground-penetrating radar surveys in archaeological investigations: Geophysics 51, 595–604.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Xu, B., and Noel, M., 1993, On the Completeness of Data Sets with Multielectrode Systems for Electrical Resistivity Survey: Geophysical Prospecting 41, 791–801.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |